Re: F32 (gcc) compiler cannot create executables due to annobin

2020-03-14 Thread Todd Zullinger
Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 11:54:54PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: >>> Known issue? >> >> The above was with gcc-10.0.1-0.9.fc32 and annobin-9.06-1.fc32. >> >> Looks like it was fixed in the meantime as another build gets >> gcc-10.0.1-0.8.fc32 and the same

Fedora-32-20200314.n.0 compose check report

2020-03-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200313.n.0): ID: 545860 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/545860 ID: 545967 Test: x86_64 universal i

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200314.n.0 changes

2020-03-14 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-32-20200313.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200314.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:570.12 KiB Size of

Re: F32 (gcc) compiler cannot create executables due to annobin

2020-03-14 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 11:54:54PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Known issue? > > The above was with gcc-10.0.1-0.9.fc32 and annobin-9.06-1.fc32. > > Looks like it was fixed in the meantime as another build gets > gcc-10.0.1-0.8.fc32 and the same annobin now. One either needs

Re: F32 (gcc) compiler cannot create executables due to annobin

2020-03-14 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Saturday, 14 March 2020 at 22:51, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Another build issue, this time in F32 buildroots (f32-candidate) only: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450608 > [...] > annobin: conftest.c: ICE: The size of the global_options structure has > chan

Re: s390x build problem again (_rpm.error: error reading package header)

2020-03-14 Thread Jerry James
On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 3:46 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > My scratch builds are failing on s390x: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450592 > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450600 > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=424506

F32 (gcc) compiler cannot create executables due to annobin

2020-03-14 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Another build issue, this time in F32 buildroots (f32-candidate) only: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450608 [...] annobin: conftest.c: ICE: The size of the global_options structure has changed - please rebuild annobin annobin: conftest.c: ICE: Please contact the annobin mai

s390x build problem again (_rpm.error: error reading package header)

2020-03-14 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
My scratch builds are failing on s390x: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450592 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450600 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=42450608 with: _rpm.error: error reading package header Anyone else seeing this? --

CPE Weekly: 2020-03-14

2020-03-14 Thread Aoife Moloney
--- title: CPE Weekly status email tags: CPE Weekly, email --- # CPE Weekly: 2020-03-06 Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep core servers and services running and maintained, build

Re: Review Swap

2020-03-14 Thread Yongkui Han (yonhan) via devel
Hi Mattia, Sure. That is fine. I will fix all the comments from Artur on my review request. Thanks! Yongkui On 3/14/20, 12:39 PM, "Mattia Verga via devel" wrote: Il 14/03/20 15:13, Yongkui Han (yonhan) ha scritto: > Hi Mattia, > > I would like to swap review with you, howe

Re: Review Swap

2020-03-14 Thread Yongkui Han (yonhan) via devel
Hi Mattia, I would like to swap review with you, however, I am new to Fedora packager, not sure if I am qualified. I am still reading the Fedora packaging guidelines: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ Anyway, here is my Fedora package review request: https://bugzilla.red

Fedora-Rawhide-20200314.n.0 compose check report

2020-03-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 14/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200313.

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200314.n.0 changes

2020-03-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200313.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200314.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 20 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:570.12

Re: Review Swap

2020-03-14 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 14/03/20 15:13, Yongkui Han (yonhan) ha scritto: > Hi Mattia, > > I would like to swap review with you, however, I am new to Fedora packager, > not sure if I am qualified. I am still reading the Fedora packaging > guidelines: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > Any

Review Swap

2020-03-14 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Hi, does anyone want to swap a review? I need https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813563 in order to upgrade libpasastro. Thanks Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.

Fedora-IoT-32-20200314.0 compose check report

2020-03-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200313.0): ID: 545624 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload

RFC: entering luks password on grub level for devices without keyboards

2020-03-14 Thread Marius Schwarz
Hi all, bevor we start, it is a VERY VERY SPECIAL situation i will talk about now. It could get fixed by a UNUSUAL approach. The device we talk about as an example is the SURFACE PRO Tablet Series from Microsoft WITH a LUKS encrypted installation on the drive. Situation: If you encrypt  the fed

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200314.0 compose check report

2020-03-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

unable to push to git: id.fedoraproject.org redirects to localhost

2020-03-14 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hi, I just tried to push some changes to git but was unable to do. $ git push Please visit https://id.fedoraproject.org/openidc/Authorization?scope=openid+https%3A%2F%2Fid.fedoraproject.org%2Fscope%2Fgroups+https%3A%2F%2Fmbs.fedoraproject.org%2Foidc%2Fsubmit-build+https%3A%2F%2Fsrc.fedoraprojec

Re: How to fix a dependency to the version at build time?

2020-03-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 14. 03. 20 8:16, Dan Čermák wrote: However, I am not an expert on RPM macro evaluation and kinda worried that this uses the clang version that is present on the system building the srpm, which might not be the version that I want? Or is this not a problem on Koji? It's not a problem. In fact

Re: [HEADS UP] Fonts packaging guidelines change status

2020-03-14 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Hi all, WHAT IS IT ALL ABOUT On 2020-02-13, FPC approved a rewrite of our fonts packaging guidelines. STATUS ✅ Published https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/ (grammar fixes welcome as a PR) ✅ Fedora 33 and next ✅ Fedora 32 (before freeze deadline) ✅ Fedora

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200314.0 compose check report

2020-03-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200313.n.0 changes

2020-03-14 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-32-20200312.n.1 NEW: Fedora-32-20200313.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:8 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 104 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.56 MiB Size of dropped packages:125.74 MiB Siz

Fedora-32-20200313.n.0 compose check report

2020-03-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200312.n.1): ID: 545607 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/545607 ID: 545614 Test: x86_64 univ

How to fix a dependency to the version at build time?

2020-03-14 Thread Dan Čermák
Hi list, I have recently received a bug report for my package ccls, that it currently fails in certain cases, because it hard codes the paths to /lib64/clang/$CLANG_VERSION for autocompletion at build time. This means that I need to make ccls depend on the *exact* clang version which was availabl