On Friday, March 20, 2020 6:09:51 AM MST Ben Cotton wrote:
> This thread is off-topic and not in the spirit of our Friends
> foundation. Please refrain from further replies.
>
> --
> Ben Cotton
> He / Him / His
> Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
> Red Hat
> TZ=America/Indiana/Indian
On 3/21/20 7:25 PM, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 20-03-21 08:45:09, Andreas Tunek wrote:
I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the
start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some
kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved.
However, I
On 20-03-21 08:45:09, Andreas Tunek wrote:
I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from
the
start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was
some
kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved.
However, I still have the problem and I wonder
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Den lör 21 mars 2020 kl 15:24 skrev Stephen John Smoogen :
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:46 Andreas Tunek
> wrote:
>
>> I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the
>> start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some
>> kind of bug or some
---
title: CPE Weekly status email
tags: CPE Weekly, email
---
# CPE Weekly: 2020-03-21
Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep
core servers and services running and maintained, build
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200320.0):
ID: 552562 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproje
OLD: Fedora-32-20200320.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 11
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 34.83 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200320.n.0):
ID: 552445 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/552445
ID: 552450 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 6/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200320.n
On 21. 03. 20 16:41, Pete Walter wrote:
Thanks for asking nicely (instead of demanding like Neal Gompa did ...).
Neal actually asked you nicely several times, including the original Buzgilla.
It seemed like you were not there, so he rightfully initiated the non-responsive
policy.
Please stop
21.03.2020, 10:15, "Neal Gompa" :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote:
>> For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I
>> am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment.
>
> In that case, I'd be happy to take on co-maintainership (admin)
Sure, I've bumped the access level and please go ahead. Thanks for asking
nicely (instead of demanding like Neal Gompa did ...).
Pete
21.03.2020, 15:20, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:02:18AM +, Pete Walter wrote:
>> For months!? This is the first email I get from you.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:02:18AM +, Pete Walter wrote:
> For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I
> am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment.
Hi Pete,
The infra-sig group has already commit access to pygit2, however, to request a
new bran
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default_upload:
System load changed from 0.18 to 0.30
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/551996#downloads
Cur
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200320.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 147
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 16.89 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 8:39 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I can look at it later today. I'll also check if I have a pending package
> review for you :)
Thank you, Fabio! This will help me finally get rid of all the broken
deps reports for the coq stack.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 15:32 Jerry James wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 8:00 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > I have one more review I would like to swap with somebody. This is
> > one of the last 2 packages I need to be able to update the coq stack.
> > The other is already under review. Who needs
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 8:00 PM Jerry James wrote:
> I have one more review I would like to swap with somebody. This is
> one of the last 2 packages I need to be able to update the coq stack.
> The other is already under review. Who needs a review?
>
> ocaml-ppx-deriving-yojson: https://bugzilla
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:46 Andreas Tunek wrote:
> I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the
> start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some
> kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved.
>
> However, I still have the problem
I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the
start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some
kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved.
However, I still have the problem and I wonder if this a problem unique to
my hardware or a gene
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> For months!? This is the first email I get from you.
>
That's really surprising. I had CC'd you on each email requesting for
assistance on getting pagure's dependencies into EPEL 8 from December
through now, and I filed the bug asking for an
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 6:02 AM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I
> am around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment.
>
In that case, I'd be happy to take on co-maintainership (admin) or
even take over the package entirely
For months!? This is the first email I get from you. Just for the record, I am
around, but have 0 interest in EPEL 8 as of the moment.
Pete
21.03.2020, 08:41, "Neal Gompa" :
> Hello all,
>
> I've been trying to get in touch with Pete Walter for a few months now
> w.r.t. python-pygit2[0]. Unfort
This would be nice. It is blocking from upgrading tokei and bunch of
other Rust-based packages in F31.
I am out of time and not willing to do anything related to pushing new
libgit2 in F31, so would be happy to assist anybody who will pick this
work up.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:45 AM Fabio Valen
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 09:42 Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I've been trying to get in touch with Pete Walter for a few months now
> w.r.t. python-pygit2[0]. Unfortunately, he hasn't been responding to
> my emails[1][2][3] (he was CC'd to all of those) or the bug I filed
> requesting pygit2 f
On 3/20/20 9:25 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:06 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 3/16/20 6:25 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
I'm glad to *finally* see this happen, so congratulations to the RPM
team for finally making this a reality! I look forward to trying this
out in Rawhide as soon
Hello all,
I've been trying to get in touch with Pete Walter for a few months now
w.r.t. python-pygit2[0]. Unfortunately, he hasn't been responding to
my emails[1][2][3] (he was CC'd to all of those) or the bug I filed
requesting pygit2 for EPEL 8[4].
I've also filed the requisite non-responsive
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 9:59 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've been trying to get Pagure into EPEL 8 for a couple of months now
> > so that we can upgrade our Pagure instances to RHEL 8[1].
> >
> > Thankfully, most of Pagure's
30 matches
Mail list logo
