Fwd: Re: Non responsible maintainer for python-speaklater - xhaksx

2020-04-09 Thread SAL
Hello, this reply has been received from Juan, but looks like he isn't been received into list (possible he isn't joined fedora-devel mailinglist). Should I still wait a week to open FESCo issue or can I do it now? SAL - Forwarded message fro

Re: Urgently downgrade xorg-x11-drv-intel

2020-04-09 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:57 PM Adam Jackson wrote: > And this mostly doesn't matter because we default to a different driver > for most Intel hardware released since about 2006, with the notable > exception of your (Alexei's) machine which was new as of about 2010. Please consider Freeze Excepti

Re: git-core deps under f32

2020-04-09 Thread James Cassell
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 10:11 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > I wrote: > > clime wrote: > >> It seems the f32's git-core got many more deps for some reason, even > >> such as dbus-broker or systemd. > [...] > > I'll try to poke a bit in the next few days as I can make > > some time. I had not noticed

Re: git-core deps under f32

2020-04-09 Thread Todd Zullinger
I wrote: > clime wrote: >> It seems the f32's git-core got many more deps for some reason, even >> such as dbus-broker or systemd. [...] > I'll try to poke a bit in the next few days as I can make > some time. I had not noticed the inflated depchain. Thank > you for pointing it out. I was curiou

[Test-Announce] 2020-04-13 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2020-04-09 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2020-04-13 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! We didn't meet last week, so let's have a quick get together, mainly to check in on current proposals

[Test-Announce] 2020-04-13 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 32 Blocker Review Meeting

2020-04-09 Thread Adam Williamson
# F32 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2020-04-13 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 5 proposed Final blockers and 1 proposed Final freeze exception to review, so let's have a Fedora 32 blocker review meeting on Monday! If you have time this w

Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging

2020-04-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 04. 20 15:43, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: To remove some of the warnings thrown by `fedpkg` or to simply keep `rpmbuild` working locally, you will have to install the `rpmautospec-rpm-macros` package available in your nearest bodhi (it's still hot from the oven at the time of writing this em

Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging

2020-04-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 04. 20 23:57, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 04. 20 20:45, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: I actually cannot comment on this, it may be worth opening a koji ticket to ask if this is the case or not and if it is if they can think of a way to deal with this. I plan to test this in staging and follo

Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging

2020-04-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 04. 20 20:45, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: I actually cannot comment on this, it may be worth opening a koji ticket to ask if this is the case or not and if it is if they can think of a way to deal with this. I plan to test this in staging and follow up on that, but possibly after Easter.

Re: git-core deps under f32

2020-04-09 Thread Todd Zullinger
Hi, clime wrote: > Hello, > > I very much appreciate the git-core package but there seems to be some > change under f32 which makes it download many more deps during > installation. > > This is f32: > > $ mock -r fedora-32-x86_64 install git-core > ... > = > Package > ==

Fedora-IoT-33-20200409.0 compose check report

2020-04-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200401.0): ID: 572057 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/572057 Old failures (sam

Fedora 32 Final blocker bug email #2

2020-04-09 Thread Ben Cotton
How time flies! The Final Freeze is underway and the Go/No-Go decision is in one week. Let's squish some bugs. Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. dnf — DNF prompts for GPG key import for "repo_gpgcheck=1"-repositories despite "rpm --import"-ing the keys fir

[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Final Go/No-Go meeting

2020-04-09 Thread Ben Cotton
Dear all, The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 32 Final release will be held on Thursday, 2020-04-16 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting View the meeting on Fedocal at: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9738/

git-core deps under f32

2020-04-09 Thread clime
Hello, I very much appreciate the git-core package but there seems to be some change under f32 which makes it download many more deps during installation. This is f32: $ mock -r fedora-32-x86_64 install git-core ... = Package = Installing: git-core

FedoraRespin-31-updates-20200408.0 compose check report

2020-04-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Soas live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 5/35 (x86_64) ID: 571959 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/571959 ID: 571960 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openq

Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Network Time Security

2020-04-09 Thread Brandon Nielsen
On 4/9/20 11:06 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 02:09:01PM -0500, Brandon Nielsen wrote: On 4/8/20 3:42 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: What is the issue with using untrusted DNS servers here? An NTS client is supposed to verify the certificates. Local MITM attackers shouldn't b

Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Network Time Security

2020-04-09 Thread Brandon Nielsen
On 4/9/20 10:42 AM, Björn Persson wrote: [snip] Fedora's defaults should be chosen to keep users reasonably secure every way we can. If you as a sysadmin trust the DHCP server and every other device on the local network – including any device that may be connected in the future – then you should

Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging

2020-04-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 05:43:36PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 04. 20 15:43, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > We have written some documentation on how `rpmautospec` works and how you > > can opt in at:https://docs.pagure.org/Fedora-Infra.rpmautospec/ > > Thanks for working on this \o/ > > I

Re: buildroot problems on rawhide i386, armv7hl ??

2020-04-09 Thread Florian Weimer
Sorry about your troubles. I have identified the problematic upstream change, and we will cease rawhide updates of glibc until that issue is fixed. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to d

Compiler optimizations and Fedora's default hardening compiler flags

2020-04-09 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
Hello all, Currently on Fedora the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 compiler flag is enabled by default. However it seems that the minimum acceptable optimization option for it, is -Og and if -O0 is specified, a ton of warnings are generated: warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O)

Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Network Time Security

2020-04-09 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 02:09:01PM -0500, Brandon Nielsen wrote: > On 4/8/20 3:42 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > What is the issue with using untrusted DNS servers here? An NTS client > > is supposed to verify the certificates. Local MITM attackers shouldn't > > be able to force the client to sync

Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging

2020-04-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 04. 20 15:43, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: We have written some documentation on how `rpmautospec` works and how you can opt in at:https://docs.pagure.org/Fedora-Infra.rpmautospec/ Thanks for working on this \o/ I will definitively try this out soon. Here is one important concern I have

Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Network Time Security

2020-04-09 Thread Björn Persson
Brandon Nielsen wrote: > If the DNS servers provided by DHCP are trusted, why > would any plain NTP servers also provided by DHCP not be trusted? I can > do nefarious things with either. For DNS the solution is to not trust the DHCP-provided resolvers but validate DNSsec locally. A valid chain o

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200409.n.0 changes

2020-04-09 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-32-20200408.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200409.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Non responsible maintainer for python-speaklater - xhaksx

2020-04-09 Thread SAL
Hello, I am searching for Juan Barba O, with Fedora account xhaksx. If anyone knows, where to contact him, let me know. If he don't want to maintain python-speaklater package anymore, let me know too. Thank you. Adding people from package's BZ CC to CC. I am trying to build TurboGears, ToscaW

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Introduce module Obsoletes and EOL

2020-04-09 Thread James Cassell
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 10:00 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 12:05:07PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > if the module EOL is before a given Fedora version goes EOL, it should > > never be proposed for installation in that Fedora version. In other words, > > if foo:3.

Orphaning soundtracker

2020-04-09 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Hi all, soundtracker is FTBFS and is basically gnome 1 software that necro-limped along like a zombie for a few years (read: decades). As it FTBFS and is dead upstream, I believe it's suffering bitrot so it's probably time to let it die. As such, I'm orphaning this package, and it will probably b

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Introduce module Obsoletes and EOL

2020-04-09 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 12:05:07PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > if the module EOL is before a given Fedora version goes EOL, it should > never be proposed for installation in that Fedora version. In other words, > if foo:3.15 stream has EOL of 1/4/2020, it should be shown in > 'dnf m

Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging

2020-04-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, You may remember that Nils, Adam and pingou have been investigating what it would take to get rid of maintaining the changelog and release fields manually in our spec files (but still have them in the produced RPMs). We have already discussed the idea in a few threads: -

Re: Frama-C failing to build because of alt-ergo broken deps

2020-04-09 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 3:23 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > It does seem as if you can now build against the new OCaml version. I > have just rebuilt ocaml-menhir with Coq enabled. > > I didn't touch frama-c or alt-ergo. I actually tried to launch the builds last night, but they failed due to the

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-08-15 16:00 UTC)

2020-04-09 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le mercredi 14 août 2019 à 23:50 -0400, James Antill a écrit : > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC > meeting Sadly, I find myself forced to request adding https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/968 to FPC‘s agenda Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Introduce module Obsoletes and EOL

2020-04-09 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 12:28:15PM -0400, James Cassell wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020, at 12:05 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:02:02PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:13:16PM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote: > [snip] > > > > Setting eol_date

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200409.0 compose check report

2020-04-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200409.0 compose check report

2020-04-09 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Frama-C failing to build because of alt-ergo broken deps

2020-04-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:42:22AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Apr 05, 2020 at 09:08:51PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 3:45 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43032715 > > > > > > I'm no

Re: buildroot problems on rawhide i386, armv7hl ??

2020-04-09 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 09. 04. 20 8:22, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822468 on glibc, maybe they can direct us to the right way. It appears that it was indeed the glibc update. After untagging it, the builds pass on 32bit. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: