Hello,
I have been trying to package franz from here:
https://github.com/meetfranz/franz/archive/v5.5.0.tar.gz
and I have the following spec file at:
UNTITLED - Pastebin Service
|
|
| |
UNTITLED - Pastebin Service
|
|
|
However, I get a bunch of warnings and errors and I am not sure
On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 4:33 AM Christopher wrote:
> Those are bugs filed against RPM. Is the RPM package responsible for
> executing lsetfilecon, or is it the grub2 package? If the grub2
> package, it seems to me that they should know that EFI partitions will
> never support lsetfilecon and they s
On 01. 05. 20 22:21, Ben Cotton wrote:
* Proposal owners:
The packages are already built for Fedora 33 in a non-default module
stream. On June 14th, 2020, the nodejs-14.x packages will become the
default in Fedora 33 (either by making the 14.x module stream be the
default stream or by rebuilding
Silvia, read this
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
, also make some reviews to others packagers, after that, I or any
sponsor can help you to join to the package maintainer group
On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 11:46 AM Silvia Sánchez wrote:
>
>
> For the records, I'm
> Does anyone know why they are all optional there?
Don't know why they are optional but most packages from this list will not run
or retired already.
I want to suggest add game launchers here which already packaged in Fedora:
- minigalaxy
- gamehub
- legendary
- lutris
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200430.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200502.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 80
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.07 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 11:51:57AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1]
> >>
> >> /usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden symbol `__aarch
Greetings.
There's a ticket https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/issue/492 (formerly a
bug) that the games group in comps has nothing in it.
Thats not quite the case, it has a ton of games in it, but they are all
optional. ;(
I have no much horse in this race, but I thought I would see if folks
her
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1]
>>
>> /usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in
>> /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd
For the records, I'm still interested in co-maintaining this package.
Please, let me know which are the next steps.
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 01:21, Alessio wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-31 at 10:09 +0300, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> >
> > I'm perfectly fine with Fedora's policy regarding Python2. When
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200502.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sat, 2 May 2020 12:36:29 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1]
>
> /usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in
> /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced
> by DSO
> /
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1]
>
> /usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in
> /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by
> DSO
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 591295 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/591295
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.i
> Seems like a lot of things just started to fail to build on aarch64.
I also get the following only for aarch64:
/usr/bin/ld: index.lib.o: in function `IndexBase::clear(void (*)(void*, int))':
/builddir/build/BUILD/audacious-4.0.3/src/libaudcore/index.cc:48: undefined
reference to `__aarch64_ld
Hi
I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1]
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in
/usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced
by DSO
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: bad value
collect2: error: ld returned
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 12:03 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:55 AM Christopher wrote:
> > Can anybody tell me why the grub package seems to want to label files
> > on the EFI partition during updates?
> > I had thought that, by definition, EFI partitions were basically FAT,
> >
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-05-04 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
Yes
On Sat, 2 May 2020 at 01:21, Alessio wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-31 at 10:09 +0300, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> >
> > I'm perfectly fine with Fedora's policy regarding Python2. When
> > upstream updates to 3, I'll be happy to comaintain together with
> > Alessio.
>
> For the record, bleac
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
See
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/affected-by/gcc?epoch1=0&version1=10.0.1&release1=0.12.fc33&epoch2=0&version2=10.0.1&release2=0.13.fc33&collection=f33
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/affected-by/cpp?epoch1=0&version1=10.0.1&release1=0.12.fc33&epoch2=0&version2=10.0.1&release2=0.13.fc33&c
Sure!
TYVM!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedorap
22 matches
Mail list logo
