Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-07 Thread Konstantin Kharlamov
On Sun, 2020-06-07 at 18:19 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 12:56 PM Konstantin Kharlamov < > hi-an...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > Hello! I see a proposal to enable zram by deafult¹. If I correctly > > understand this is the thread where it's being discussed. I have a > > few > > ques

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 11:18 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Sunday, June 7, 2020 11:51:38 AM MST Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > > The third question touches the paragraph "Why not zswap?". The only > > point it mentions is that swap-device is not encrypted. Fair enough, > > although I wonder w

[Bug 1844664] CVE-2020-12723 perl: corruption of intermediate language state of compiled regular expression due to recursive S_study_chunk() calls leads to DoS [fedora-all]

2020-06-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844664 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Version|32

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:35 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > > zswap is configured by sysfs, same as zram. > s/by/via/ -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 11:25 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:26 PM Luya Tshimbalanga > > > > > zram-generator has no service unit file at all. The zram.service unit > > file is part of Anaconda. > > > Good to know. I proceed to remove on my desktop which has 32 GB RAM.

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-07 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:26 PM Luya Tshimbalanga > > zram-generator has no service unit file at all. The zram.service unit > file is part of Anaconda. > Good to know. I proceed to remove on my desktop which has 32 GB RAM. > > I'm not sure whose service this is but I don't have it. > After

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-07 Thread John M. Harris Jr
On Sunday, June 7, 2020 11:51:38 AM MST Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > Hello! I see a proposal to enable zram by deafult¹. If I correctly > understand this is the thread where it's being discussed. I have a few > questions, answers to which probably would be nice to add to the > proposal. > > 1. It

Re: Is there an official Fedora for WSL?

2020-06-07 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 6/7/20 5:22 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: I tried with Fedora rawhide (which already uses SQLite for the rpm database) and it works fine, but: - Instead of saving the image, a container must be exported: Right, you can export a container, or you can save an image and use the layer tarball inside

Re: Is there an official Fedora for WSL?

2020-06-07 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 6/7/20 12:47 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 07:15:57PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: The bad news, though, is that current versions of rpm (and dnf) won't work under WSL if you're on a Windows version older than 2004, so you might be stuck with CentOS 7 if you're on an employe

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200607.n.0 changes

2020-06-07 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200606.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200607.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 59 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.54 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:31 PM David Kaufmann wrote: > > Yes, its a quite boring example, but I've included it for completeness > as a border case. This is just the few megabytes it needs preallocated, > whilst swap is not in use at all. 12KiB when not in use? $ swapon NAME TYPE SIZE

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-07 Thread James Cassell
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, at 9:30 PM, David Kaufmann wrote: > On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 05:25:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > >> At 150% memory usage assuming a 2:1 compression ratio this would mean: > >> - disk swap: > >> has to write 4G to disk initially, and for reading swap another 4G > >> (12G

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-07 Thread David Kaufmann
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 05:25:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> This is not generally true, only if RAM gets so tight that applications >> start competing for swap. >> This is why I've proposed test cases testing exactly that, as for >> the case of persistent swap I'd expect the outcome to be a cl

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-07 Thread Chris Murphy
By the way, shout out to Bastien Nocera. This feature was his idea before I got around to picking it up and running with it. https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/98 --- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 12:56 PM Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > > Hello! I see a proposal to enable zram by deafult¹. If I correctly > understand this is the thread where it's being discussed. I have a few > questions, answers to which probably would be nice to add to the > proposal. > > 1. It says

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:48 PM David Kaufmann wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:36:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > To me this sounds like too much dependency on swap. > > That's not what I meant, I wanted to emphasize the different values of > disk storage vs. RAM. As said in another email

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-07 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:26 PM Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > Tested on HP Envy x360 Convertible Ryzen 2500u with 16 GB RAM and 1TB > SSD on Fedora 32 Design Suite. > > Following the procedure to install zram-generator setting memory > allocation to 0.50 (or 50%) and commenting out "resume=UUID" lin

CPE Weekly: 2020-06-07

2020-06-07 Thread Aoife Moloney
--- title: CPE Weekly status email tags: CPE Weekly, email --- # CPE Weekly: 2020-06-07 Background: The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep core servers and services running and maintained, build

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-07 Thread David Kaufmann
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:36:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > To me this sounds like too much dependency on swap. That's not what I meant, I wanted to emphasize the different values of disk storage vs. RAM. As said in another email it doesn't matter at all if there is 0% or 90% of disk swap usag

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-07 Thread stan via devel
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:30:09 -0400 Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy > An obvious example is Firefox. Upstream, the Firefox project builds > primarily with Clang/LLVM. Yet we force the Fedora package owner to > find and fix issues building with GCC then e

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

2020-06-07 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Tested on HP Envy x360 Convertible Ryzen 2500u with 16 GB RAM and 1TB SSD on Fedora 32 Design Suite. Following the procedure to install zram-generator setting memory allocation to 0.50 (or 50%) and commenting out "resume=UUID" line on fstab and kernel parameter on boot via grubby, the allocate

Re: swap-on-ZRAM by default

2020-06-07 Thread Konstantin Kharlamov
Hello! I see a proposal to enable zram by deafult¹. If I correctly understand this is the thread where it's being discussed. I have a few questions, answers to which probably would be nice to add to the proposal. 1. It says ZRAM gets enabled on upgrade. What's gonna happen to systems with ZSWAP is

Re: broken threads

2020-06-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 02:43:49PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/5/20 2:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > This has been bothering me for a while, it occurs quite often for > > certain posters to the list, and since Jeff's replies reproduce this > > issue, let me ask: > > > > Why is

Re: Some services are failing to start with mount namespace errors

2020-06-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:04:38AM +0200, Igor Raits wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On fully updated rawhide, > > ● systemd-hostnamed.service - Hostname Service > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-hostnamed.service; > static; vendor preset: disab

It seems that gdb cannot find debuginfo on f32

2020-06-07 Thread Barry Scott
I'm trying to debug a segv in PyQt5 and I hit a problem with gdb not finding debug info in f32. I have installed python3.8 debug info. $ dnf list installed | grep debug | grep python3 python3-debuginfo.x86_64 3.8.3-1.fc32 @updates-debuginfo pyth

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

2020-06-07 Thread Jeff Law
On Sat, 2020-06-06 at 07:58 +0200, Igor Raits wrote: > The big problem then becomes getting packagers to address the > > diagnostics. I've > > been disappointed at how many packages are ignoring diagnostics > > (particularly > > those with security implications) and I'm actively looking at schemes

Re: Is there an official Fedora for WSL?

2020-06-07 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 04:22, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 6/2/20 4:52 AM, Code Zombie wrote: > > Is there an official branch of Fedora for WSL or a plan to create one? > > > The good news is that it's reasonably straightforward to install an > unpackaged distribution, you just need a tarball of th

Re: Increasing the packaging team: regular workshops/vFADs/classroom sessions on packaging

2020-06-07 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 06:40:43 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 5:54 AM Andy Mender wrote: > > Hiya, > > As someone who is trying to get into packaging in Fedora, I would really > really appreciate the docs being less dispersed: > - https://docs.fedoraproject.or

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200607.0 compose check report

2020-06-07 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 612945 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/612945 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.i

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200607.0 compose check report

2020-06-07 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Is there an official Fedora for WSL?

2020-06-07 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 07:15:57PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > It's not click and run by any means, but it's feasible. > > The bad news, though, is that current versions of rpm (and dnf) won't work > under WSL if you're on a Windows version older than 2004, so you might be > stuck with CentOS 7