W dniu 29.06.2020 o 20:30, Tom Callaway pisze:
> I just built lua 5.4.0 in Rawhide. As with previous major updates of
> lua, the package also includes a copy of the lua 5.3 libraries so that
> rawhide does not just become broken reps. If you depend on lua, please
> rebuild your packages in rawhide
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 11:26:34PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that ppc64 is gone, s390x is the only big-endian architecture
> left. Bugs around endianness are not usually difficult to fix, _if_ I
> can debug it and see where exactly the problem is. However, this
> require
I'm really uncomfortable about the amount of crossp-posting, so I'm
limiting this to devel@ (I receive it) and test@ (obvious to me why
relevant).
Kamil Paral writes:
> Adam writes:
> > Arguably the environment from which they logged in is not
> > "working as expected" if you can't then log in
Hi,
Now that ppc64 is gone, s390x is the only big-endian architecture
left. Bugs around endianness are not usually difficult to fix, _if_ I
can debug it and see where exactly the problem is. However, this
requires a tedious guess-a-patch, try a scratch build, check the
result, rinse and repeat.
M
So, I'm getting one of these messages every couple of hours and I'd
really rather not. Who do I need to talk to about it?
FWIW - It seems to fail because of missing deps:
DEBUG util.py:621: No matching package to install: 'cmake(Qt5)'
DEBUG util.py:621: No matching package to install: 'cmake
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 6:17 PM James Cassell
wrote:
>
> As general feedback, the footnotes make it hard to read the rendered version
> of the document, forcing me to scroll up and down.
>
Well, the idea is that the footnotes are additional information
providing justification for the policy. You
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 5:38 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> Hi, Stephen.
>
> On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 21:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > FESCo has requested that I submit the module policy once more to the
> > Fedora development list for discussion. Feedback is welcome.
>
> [.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 2:21 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 21:56 +0200, David Schwörer wrote:
> > On 8/5/20 8:45 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> > > when doing this I hit
> > > https://github.
As general feedback, the footnotes make it hard to read the rendered version of
the document, forcing me to scroll up and down.
More comments below.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, at 3:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * If a stream of a module has build-time-only components, all such
> components *MUST*
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:12 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:57 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> After discussing this with FESCo last week, this is submitted at a F33
>> change since it's largely a paperwork exercise at this point.
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTEdit
Hi, Stephen.
On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 21:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> FESCo has requested that I submit the module policy once more to the
> Fedora development list for discussion. Feedback is welcome.
[...]
> * The default stream of a module *MUST NOT* change to a different
> stream wit
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 21:56 +0200, David Schwörer wrote:
> On 8/5/20 8:45 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> > when doing this I hit
> > https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents us
> > from
On 8/5/20 8:30 AM, Jiří Eischmann wrote:
Zdenek Dohnal píše v St 05. 08. 2020 v 07:44 +0200:
Hi all,
I would like to announce sane-airscan project [1] will be shipped in
the
official Fedora repositories from Fedora 32 [2].
sane-airscan implements a backend for Microsoft WSD and ESCL (usually
c
On 05/08/20 04:35 +0200, J. Scheurich wrote:
Am 05.08.20 um 01:52 schrieb Ben Cotton:
Here are some upcoming deadlines and milestones for the Fedora 33
development cycle:
Are you sure, that boost1.73 should be part of fedora 33 ?
It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of gcc/g+
On 8/5/20 8:45 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> when doing this I hit
> https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents us
> from compiling espresso with -lto, so I set _lto_cflags to %{nil},
> which
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 9:41 PM Christoph Junghans wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:54 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 12:45 -0600, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> > > when doing this I hit
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:54 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 12:45 -0600, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> > when doing this I hit
> > https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents us
FESCo has requested that I submit the module policy once more to the
Fedora development list for discussion. Feedback is welcome.
Plainext (asciidoc) below, much more readable HTML at
https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/docs/modularity/modularity/policies/
= Policies Regarding Modules in Fedora,
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 12:45 -0600, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> when doing this I hit
> https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents us
> from compiling espresso with -lto, so I set _lto_cflags to
Hi,
I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
when doing this I hit
https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents us
from compiling espresso with -lto, so I set _lto_cflags to %{nil},
which works for the build with openmpi, but gets ignored for the
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:57 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> After discussing this with FESCo last week, this is submitted at a F33
> change since it's largely a paperwork exercise at this point.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTEditionPromotion
>
> = Promote IoT to an Edition =
>
> == Summary
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:36:40PM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote:
> Hey list,
>
>
> How do Fedora rawhide images get respun? Every time filesystem updates,
They are rebuild in every rawhide nightly compose.
Here's the one from last night/this morning:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?ta
Hello,
I need a package review for rig, looking for a review swap.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861440
- jake / turboturtle
--
Jake Hunsaker
RHCA Cloud Specialist
Senior Software Engineer
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-08-05 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:07 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> There's a sort of technical argument to be made that this is covered by
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Beta_Release_Criteria#desktop-shutdown-reboot-logout
> .
> That says "Shutting down, logging out and rebooting must work usi
Zdenek Dohnal píše v St 05. 08. 2020 v 07:44 +0200:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to announce sane-airscan project [1] will be shipped in
> the
> official Fedora repositories from Fedora 32 [2].
>
> sane-airscan implements a backend for Microsoft WSD and ESCL (usually
> called AirScan, originating f
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:53 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
>
> Hi Neal, all,
>
> On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:32 AM Till Hofmann
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have a number of packages that are FTBFS due to
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wik
Hi Neal, all,
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:32 AM Till Hofmann
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a number of packages that are FTBFS due to
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds.
> >
> > None of my packag
Hey everyone,
At Nest with Fedora the CPE team will be presenting a Year in Review. As
part of that we want to hold a Community Q&A and this is a general call for
any questions that you might like to have answered by the CPE Leadership
team in that call? We can curate the top questions (with thank
On 8/5/20 10:07 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 07:44, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to announce sane-airscan project [1] will be shipped in the
>> official Fedora repositories from Fedora 32 [2].
>>
>> sane-airscan implements a back
On 05.08.2020 04:35, J. Scheurich wrote:
> Are you sure, that boost1.73 should be part of fedora 33 ?
It is already part of Fedora 33.
> It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of gcc/g++
No. Everything works as required.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
__
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 09:54:14AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:48:45PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> >> When ocamlopt is used with binutils 2.35 to link an executable, we now
> >> get warnings that look like this:
> >>
> >> /usr/bin/ld: tes
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 06:26:37PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 07:05:45PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > That's possible (the paths could be hardcoded in the systemd unit
> > file), but is it a good idea to force the users to use the new system?
> > If so
Dne 04. 08. 20 v 21:38 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a):
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:31 am, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>> Should we go back to the old workaround for F33? Madness for one more
>> release? And then drop the madness once there's a dnf solution?
>
> We could, but we have installed so many othe
Dne 04. 08. 20 v 20:58 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a):
> On 04.08.2020 16:45, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> I think the "don't use autoremove" is better suggestion ATM, because I
>> don't really want to keep earlyoom on the system in case there is
>> systemd-oomd or whatever should be the successor.
>
On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 07:44, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to announce sane-airscan project [1] will be shipped in the
> official Fedora repositories from Fedora 32 [2].
>
> sane-airscan implements a backend for Microsoft WSD and ESCL (usually
> called AirScan, origina
* J. Scheurich:
> It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of gcc/g++
Why do you think that?
According to Boost upstream, anything later than GCC 8 is untested, but
I don't think this is actually true.
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing li
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:48:45PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>> When ocamlopt is used with binutils 2.35 to link an executable, we now
>> get warnings that look like this:
>>
>> /usr/bin/ld: tests/test_topsort.o: warning: relocation in read-only
>> section `.text'
>> /usr
On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 10:38:29 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:40 AM Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Are there options for remote-wipe features for Fedora (or RHEL for that
> > matter)?
>
> >
> >
> > Ideally something integrated into the early boot process, as we
39 matches
Mail list logo
