On Sat, 2020-08-22 at 01:13 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 08. 20 0:18, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:43 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > I've updated python-sphinx to 3.2.1 in rawhide and f33.
> > >
> > Ah, it's one of those packages I'm technically the primary
>
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. libreport — abrt-server errors when processing zstd compressed core
dumps produced by systemd-246~rc1-1.fc33 — POST
ACTION: abrt maintainers to make a new release containing the fix
2. resteasy — FreeIPA deployment fails in curren
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2020-08-24
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
Fedora 33 has branched, and we have a couple of criteria proposals to
discuss, so let's have a meetin
# F33 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2020-08-24
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have only 1 proposed Beta blocker to review at present,
but more may well show up over the weekend, so let's have a Fedora 33
blocker review meeting on Monday!
If
On Sat, 2020-08-22 at 00:23 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:12 AM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network connections
> > using DHCP and static addressing.
>
> For IPV6, SLAAC is more common than DHCP(v6)
> (especially
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:12 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> It must be possible to establish both IPv4 and IPv6 network connections
> using DHCP and static addressing.
For IPV6, SLAAC is more common than DHCP(v6)
(especially) in the consumer space. I would like
to see a SLAAC requirement be added
Hi folks!
So at this week's blocker review meeting, the fact that we don't have
explicit networking requirements in the release criteria really started
to bite us. In the past we have squeezed networking-related issues in
under other criteria, but for some issues that's really difficult,
notably V
On 22. 08. 20 0:18, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi Miro,
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:43 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I've updated python-sphinx to 3.2.1 in rawhide and f33.
Ah, it's one of those packages I'm technically the primary maintainer
of that I'm trying to offload.
Can I give it to you,
Hi Miro,
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 16:43 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I've updated python-sphinx to 3.2.1 in rawhide and f33.
>
Ah, it's one of those packages I'm technically the primary maintainer
of that I'm trying to offload.
Can I give it to you, or to the SIG?
Regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Sa
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 4:55 PM Christoph Junghans wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The new %ctest macro generates so much output, it sometimes makes it
> hard to find the actual failure. Especially with gtest, where you have
> many tests in one executable and multiple executables run at the same
> time..
>
> I
Hi,
The new %ctest macro generates so much output, it sometimes makes it
hard to find the actual failure. Especially with gtest, where you have
many tests in one executable and multiple executables run at the same
time..
Is there a way to drop the "--verbose" option?
"%ctest --quiet" works but su
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 17:09 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 10:19 +, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> > > - Do you have custom mock configuration in ~/.config/mock.cfg?
> > No, I don't even have that file.
> >
> > > - Are files in /etc/mock/ up-to-date, or are there lots of
> > > .rpmn
On 21. 08. 20 10:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Josh listed some of the key reasons behind default streams: that
enterprise customers don't like to learn new commands. So default
streams allowed us to package content with shorter-than-RHEL-lifetime
and still `yum install foo` would instal
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 10:19 +, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> > - Do you have custom mock configuration in ~/.config/mock.cfg?
> No, I don't even have that file.
>
> > - Are files in /etc/mock/ up-to-date, or are there lots of .rpmnew
> > files?
> mock-core-configs is up to date (32.7-1.fc32), there's
Hey all,
First of all, thanks to everyone that has taken the time to complete the
survey for us already. It will remain open until the end of August, so if
you haven't had the chance to fill it in yet, we'd really appreciate you
taking the few minutes to do so before it closes.
Thanks again,
Ant
On 21. 08. 20 16:38, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:41 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
I want a policy for Fedora (and I see ELN as part of Fedora) that says: "Default
streams are not allowed."
We already have that policy. In the IRC meeting line you quoted I expressed my
feeling th
I've updated python-sphinx to 3.2.1 in rawhide and f33.
It only breaks one package (python-graphql-core) -- all other packages either
build fine with new Sphinx or FTBFS for unrelated reasons.
I'll have a look at python-graphql-core to see how it can be fixed.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +42077
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 9:41 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I want a policy for Fedora (and I see ELN as part of Fedora) that says:
> "Default
> streams are not allowed."
>
> We already have that policy. In the IRC meeting line you quoted I expressed my
> feeling that the policy also applies (and shoul
Hi,
tl;dr should we make it easier/automatic for users to use the
Diffie-Hellman parameters defined in RFC7919?
For a long time, the general recommendation for Finite-Field
Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters (FFDHE, for use with
non-elliptic-curve DH, i.e. the dhparam-file many server config
On 21. 08. 20 15:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:08 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 20. 08. 20 20:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Yet despite all this, we got a proposal to allow default modular streams in ELN.
The messaging about this proposal suggests that later, default modul
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:08 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 20. 08. 20 20:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Yet despite all this, we got a proposal to allow default modular streams
> >> in ELN.
> >> The messaging about this proposal suggests that later, default modular
> >> streams
> >> might be
Hi all,
I am about to build new ldc 1.23.0 that comes with a soname bump for
both f33 and rawhide. I'll handle rebuilds of dependencies, with the
exception of the following two packages that were already FTBFS prior to
the ldc bump:
appstream-generator
glibd
(Maintainers for the two failing
On 8/20/20 6:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> As tedious as it is, my suggestion is kernel bisect.
>
> Various strategies abound. I'd probably go for course to fine
> granularity: start with Fedora Live ISOs, and see clearly where it
> does and doesn't happen. It sounds like the problem manifests quick
On 21. 08. 20 11:45, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:40:07AM +0100, Matěj Stuchlík wrote:
Hello Pierre,
thanks for the nudge — I’m no longer interested in maintaining those
packages.
Many thanks for the prompt response. I'll orphan python-docutils and remove you
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
> - Do you have custom mock configuration in ~/.config/mock.cfg?
No, I don't even have that file.
> - Are files in /etc/mock/ up-to-date, or are there lots of .rpmnew files?
mock-core-configs is up to date (32.7-1.fc32), there's no .rpmnew files.
> - Does running "mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 cl
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:40:07AM +0100, Matěj Stuchlík wrote:
>Hello Pierre,
>thanks for the nudge — I’m no longer interested in maintaining those
>packages.
Many thanks for the prompt response. I'll orphan python-docutils and remove you
from the other ones.
Thanks again!
Pierre
Good Morning Everyone,
While working on cleaning up the errors encountered when syncing default
assignee and CC list from dist-git to bugzilla, I ran into the user mstuchli.
The email address set in FAS does not seem to correspond to a valid bugzilla
account.
fedora_active_user indicates that the
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200820.0):
ID: 645102 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:15 AM Artur Iwicki wrote:
>
> Today I tried reviewing some Python packages:
> - x-tile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861020
> - python-iptools: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870907
>
> And the mock build done by fedora-review failed. The er
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:15 AM Artur Iwicki wrote:
>
> Today I tried reviewing some Python packages:
> - x-tile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861020
> - python-iptools: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870907
>
> And the mock build done by fedora-review failed. The err
Today I tried reviewing some Python packages:
- x-tile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861020
- python-iptools: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870907
And the mock build done by fedora-review failed. The error message I got was:
> line XX: fg: no job control
Which means
On 20. 08. 20 20:17, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Yet despite all this, we got a proposal to allow default modular streams in ELN.
The messaging about this proposal suggests that later, default modular streams
might be proposed for Fedora as well.
It was written that way*at your request*. You speci
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200820.0):
ID: 645081 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 22/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200819.n.1):
ID: 645029 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/645029
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200819.n.1)
OLD: Fedora-33-20200819.n.1
NEW: Fedora-33-20200821.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 12
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 97
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 203.38 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 02:17:09PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:46 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 05. 08. 20 21:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > FESCo has requested that I submit the module policy once more to the
> > > Fedora development list for discussion. Fe
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:19:59PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:04 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > OCaml 4.11.0 is out. Is this a good time to start a rebuild
> > of all the OCaml packages? (in a Rawhide side tag)
> >
> > I have to say it doesn't matter if not every OCa
38 matches
Mail list logo
