Hey,
I am looking for packages to maintain and this would help a lot.
Thanks,
Pruthvi.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020, 11:14 Dhanesh B. Sabane wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I've been away from all Fedora activities for quite some time and I
> don't see a return anytime soon. There are 6 Python packages which
We have carefully selected high-class and professional teachers of the Quran.
Our teachers are proficient receptors to encourage students to recite well and
to maintain their interest.
Our experience with students enables us to determine the fastest and most
effective teaching methods that, All
On 6/9/20 00:09, Till Hofmann wrote:
>
>
> On 9/5/20 3:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm having a weird problem with Bugzilla: Whenever I want to close an
>>> issue and I click on the reason menu (the
Hello.
I'd like to maintain:
python-first
python-pipdeptree
python-pipreqs
python-yarg
These are dependencies of pipenv we (@python-sig) maintain so please add
me as an admin and this group as co-maintainer.
Have a nice day.
Lumír
On 9/7/20 7:43 AM, Dhanesh B. Sabane wrote:
Hello folks!
Hey All,
Fedora is a community-driven project which means a lot of our users
use Fedora in multiple languages. The i18n Test day[0] is scheduled to
test changes that are coming in F33 along with
testing the regular GNOME apps in a multi-lingual environment.
This test day will also benefit from te
Hello folks!
I've been away from all Fedora activities for quite some time and I
don't see a return anytime soon. There are 6 Python packages which are
maintained by me and I'd like to hand them over. Following is the list
of packages:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/dhanesh95/projects
Please
# F33 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: ** 2020-09-08 ** (Tuesday!)
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Beta blockers, 1 proposed Final blocker
and 2 proposed Beta freeze exceptions to review, so let's have a Fedora
33 blocker review m
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for tomorrow. It's a
holiday in North America, so many folks who would usually be present
will be off. I'll make sure we follow up the outstanding criteria
proposals on the mailing list(s).
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC:
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 12:54:34AM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Il 19/07/20 19:41, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 05:34:13PM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote:
> >> Is it necessary to have in #fedora IRC channel, fedbot spamming 48 times
> >> per day about Fedora respins update
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200902.0):
ID: 656723 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 11:11 AM Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Does this include the fixes for
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867830 ?
No.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9307/50869307/anaconda-packaging.log
systemd-libs-246.1-1.fc33.x86_64
nss-mdns-0.14.1-8.fc33.x86_64
On 2020-09-06 1:18 a.m., Roberto Ragusa wrote:
So, Wayland support has just been included (and still disabled by
default),
while the subject suggests that both 64 bit and Wayland are required.
Regards.
In this context, the subject is Blender 2.90 (without "exclusive to 64
bits arch" sentence
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 3:00 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> I've found atime useful in several cases. If you are doubting about a
> configuration file being
> read or not by an application, you just check the atime before and after
> running it
> (way easier than strace). If you are investigating wh
Den sön 6 sep. 2020 kl 14:59 skrev :
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> for Fedora 33 Branched 20200906.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
> nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
> release validation testing,
On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 12:50:42AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> “We need”.
> Who is we, and describe the need?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Git_forge_update
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200905.n.0):
ID: 656608 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/656608
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200905.n.0):
OLD: Fedora-33-20200905.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200906.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 33 Branched 20200906.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 7/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200905.n.0):
ID: 65641
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200905.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200906.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 36
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
Hi everyone,
python-graph-tool has changed its licence from GPLv3 to LGPLv3 in
the latest 2.33 release[1]. I'm updating the package to the new release
now.
[1]
https://git.skewed.de/count0/graph-tool/-/commit/2c87c01d121e31a90c6177ed8e1b2b3f758fcd29
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 16:15:26 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 4:03 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > I'm seeing this error that causes a test failure on F32 for a noarch
> > python package. It builds in mock on my x86_64 here, but on koji it gets
> > a ppc64le builder and fails with thi
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 8:21 AM Andy Mender wrote:
> Will this affect COPR-hosted projects? So far I've been considering both
> i386 and s390 on equal terms to x86_64.
As I recall, copr supports building for the s390x (the 64-bit variant)
and not the s390 (the 32-bit (31 bit addressing) varian
On 2020-09-06 01:35, Chris Murphy wrote:
I figured nothing was using it these days and it was a complete waste. If
tracker uses atime, maybe I'll get more worried. But if it uses mtime, I'm not.
I've found atime useful in several cases. If you are doubting about a
configuration file being
r
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 11:46, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Friday, 04 September 2020 at 11:00, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > I'm looking at cleaning up some parts of the QEMU spec and we have
> > conditionals in there testing for s390 arch (aka 32-bit). IIRC
On 2020-09-05 23:53, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Blender 2.90 was released few week ago which a noticeable change, it is now
exclusively available for 64 bits architecture meaning 32 bit arch support is
discontinued by upstream. For that reason, the build will only apply for
Rawhide and Fedora 33
27 matches
Mail list logo
