On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 1:09:37 PM CEST Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> Thanks for the heads-up. There was a CI cluster downtime yesterday and
> the build was impacted by it. I restarted it, and it passed
>
> https://osci-jenkins-1.ci.fedoraproject.org/job/eln-build-pipeline/17459/
>
> The
Hello,
I'd like to inform Fedora packagers that I removed the long-overlooked and
useless post-install dependency from perl-interpreter on perl-macros package
(effective since perl-interpreter-5.32.0-463.fc34). I don't forsee any
consequences, but here are the details:
perl-macros delivers RPM ma
Hello team,
As part to adhering the Fedora cmake guideline, opensubdiv oddly failed
to build without a proper details. As I am unfamiliar with cmake
debugging, here is the tail result:
- Found TBB: /usr/include (found suitable version "2020.3", minimum required is
"4.0")
-- Found OpenGL: /us
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 2:42 PM Carl George wrote:
> Yes, the patch is from an upstream pull request [0] that has already
> been merged to the master branch [1] and is planned to be included in
> their next release [2] (it's not part of the current 1.3.2 tag). The
> pull request includes a comme
Yes, the patch is from an upstream pull request [0] that has already
been merged to the master branch [1] and is planned to be included in
their next release [2] (it's not part of the current 1.3.2 tag). The
pull request includes a comment linking to said pull request, per the
packaging guidelines
Awesome! Thanks to everyone involved!
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 1:28 PM
Messaggio originale
On 23 Set 2020, 19:17, Kevin Fenzi < ke...@scrye.com> ha scritto:
Anyone can build anything, but constrained by:
* It cannot have been built before. ie, it must be a different N-V-R from
a existing successfull build.
* It has to build against src.fedoraproject.
So, I thought I would provide an update here.
The mainframe admins discovered a large part of our woes: Our lpars were
on "slow" 7200 rpm disk. They migrated us to "fast" local disk a few
weeks ago, and indeed things are MUCH better from what I can see.
The problem is not 100% solved, as I see
Hi everyone,
No cancelations this time! The Fedora 33 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is
scheduled for Thursday 24 September. We will meet at 1700 UTC in
#fedora-meeting-1 to determine if we will release Fedora 33 Beta.
[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9810/
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him /
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200921.n.0):
ID: 675634 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/675634
ID: 675645 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso des
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 05:02:07PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 23/09/20 18:23, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:02:21PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:05:38PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> >>> Hi there
> >>>
> >>> I h
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 06:38:46PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote:
> I am suddenly seeing the following error when running mock command for
> rawhide.
> Did you see the following error?
>
> ```
> No such file or directory:
> '/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/etc/resolv.conf'
> ```
>
> ```
> $ rp
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:38 pm, Jun Aruga wrote:
I am suddenly seeing the following error when running mock command
for rawhide.
Did you see the following error?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878924
Looks like F33 and F31 updates are still in -testing, F32 update is
stable.
Il 23/09/20 18:23, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:02:21PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:05:38PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>>> Hi there
>>>
>>> I have a side-tag into which several maintainers have built their packages
>>> success
I am suddenly seeing the following error when running mock command for rawhide.
Did you see the following error?
```
No such file or directory:
'/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/etc/resolv.conf'
```
```
$ rpm -q mock
mock-2.3-1.fc32.noarch
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ruby-2.5.8-106.f
OLD: Fedora-33-20200921.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 16
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.17 MiB
Size of dropped packages:438.00 KiB
test security website https://uma.ac.id/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
Lis
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:02:21PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:05:38PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > I have a side-tag into which several maintainers have built their packages
> > successfully so that I can push a coordinated update
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200603.0):
ID: 675515 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.or
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:05:38PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I have a side-tag into which several maintainers have built their packages
> successfully so that I can push a coordinated update.
>
> Now, when I try to submit that update, bodhi cli gives an unqualified auth
> er
Hello everyone,
Thanks for the interest!
I have created a wiki page, could you please add yourselves in the
"Participants" section: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KubeDev? -
This would make it easier for me to set a meeting time that fits with
everyone's timezone.
There is also this IRC ch
You can manually set the CPU affinity (see taskset utility) to decide the
core(s) where to run your process, even if it is already running.
From: stan via devel
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 9:06 PM
To: ker...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Development discussio
Hi there
I have a side-tag into which several maintainers have built their packages
successfully so that I can push a coordinated update.
Now, when I try to submit that update, bodhi cli gives an unqualified auth
error, and bodhi web tells me I need commit access for 2 of the 5 packages (I
hav
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 11/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0):
ID: 674908 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedorapro
Hi, Kamil,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:41 PM Kamil Dudka wrote:
>
> The latest eln build of systemtap fails to install, which prevents qemu
> from being built:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1881342
>
> The maintainer of systemtap says that it is the eln rebuild what went wrong.
> So he creat
There is no agenda.
I'll chair the next meeting.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
h
The latest eln build of systemtap fails to install, which prevents qemu
from being built:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1881342
The maintainer of systemtap says that it is the eln rebuild what went wrong.
So he created a new rawhide build in the hope that it will trigger a new eln
build, whi
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200921.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 192
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.01 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200921.0):
ID: 674881 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
30 matches
Mail list logo
