On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:26 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> If you want more granular settings, see 'btrfs property', which can be
> applied per subvolume, directory or per file. It is possible to
> specify an algorithm. But is not yet possible to specify level, set it
> recursively or unset it once se
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:18:34PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:52 PM David Cantrell wrote:
> >
> >
> > PROPOSAL: Cancel the 28-Oct-2020 FESCo meeting because we have no
> > issues tagged with 'meeting' and no pending issues to discuss in an
> > open forum. I will chair th
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:52 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>
>
> PROPOSAL: Cancel the 28-Oct-2020 FESCo meeting because we have no
> issues tagged with 'meeting' and no pending issues to discuss in an
> open forum. I will chair the 04-Nov-2020 meeting.
Sounds good to me. I'm good with canceling.
-
PROPOSAL: Cancel the 28-Oct-2020 FESCo meeting because we have no
issues tagged with 'meeting' and no pending issues to discuss in an
open forum. I will chair the 04-Nov-2020 meeting.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 16:41 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> When reviewing python-TestSlide
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891963#),
> fedora-review failed with:
>
> error: attempt to use unversioned python, define %__python to
> /usr/bin/python2 or /usr/bin/python3 explici
When reviewing python-TestSlide
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891963#),
fedora-review failed with:
error: attempt to use unversioned python, define %__python to
/usr/bin/python2 or /usr/bin/python3 explicitly
This seems related to the change introduced in F33:
https://fedoraprojec
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 04:15:29PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Tue 27 Oct 2020 09:57:40 AM -04 Matthew Miller wrote:
> > I'm happy to announce that Fedora 33 is here. Thank you to the
> > thousands of people who worked on this release in some way, and to all
> > of our community. Fedora
Announcing rpminspect-1.2
Yesterday I released rpminspect-1.2 along with
rpminspect-data-fedora-1.2. For details on the new inspections,
fixes, and improvements, please see:
https://www.burdell.org/posts/2020/Oct/26/rpminspect-12-released/
The new inspections in this release are:
conf
I say thanks to *all* involed.
runs since beta on my box (as the last ~5-6 beta's during the last years did
before)
Good job !
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fed
Yeah we could have that done before the release, but that just means
we'd have to update container build instructions in several places
(and then remember to keep them updated after next Fedora releases or
risk pulling old/EOL fedora images etc).
Anyway - it was just a note that the image tags ar
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 3:44 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 27. 10. 20 v 14:57 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> > I'm happy to announce that Fedora 33 is here. Thank you to the
> > thousands of people who worked on this release in some way, and to all
> > of our community. Fedora 33 is made of bits,
On 10/27/20 10:11 AM, Joe Doss wrote:
On 10/16/20 11:21 AM, Joe Doss wrote:
Hello all,
Here is the updated package review request for github-cli 1.1.0
...
golang-github-cli-shurcool-graphql
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888971
golang-github-shurcool-githubv4
https://bugzilla
Dne 27. 10. 20 v 14:57 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> I'm happy to announce that Fedora 33 is here. Thank you to the
> thousands of people who worked on this release in some way, and to all
> of our community. Fedora 33 is made of bits, but the Fedora Project is
> made of people, and you are all aweso
Latest still points to 32, but you can say 33 explicitly and get GA bits.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020, at 11:15 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Tue 27 Oct 2020 09:57:40 AM -04 Matthew Miller wrote:
> > I'm happy to announce that Fedora 33 is here. Thank you to the
> > thousands of people who worked
On Tue 27 Oct 2020 09:57:40 AM -04 Matthew Miller wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that Fedora 33 is here. Thank you to the
> thousands of people who worked on this release in some way, and to all
> of our community. Fedora 33 is made of bits, but the Fedora Project is
> made of people, and you are a
On 10/16/20 11:21 AM, Joe Doss wrote:
Hello all,
Here is the updated package review request for github-cli 1.1.0
...
golang-github-cli-shurcool-graphql
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888971
golang-github-shurcool-githubv4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888972
S
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:52:00PM +0100, Martin Curlej wrote:
> From my point of view right now it seems that this information should not
> be a part of the module (disgit, repository metadata). It is prone to human
> error when we leave this in the hands of a packager. So this would need a
> revi
I'm happy to announce that Fedora 33 is here. Thank you to the
thousands of people who worked on this release in some way, and to all
of our community. Fedora 33 is made of bits, but the Fedora Project is
made of people, and you are all awesome.
Read the official announcement at:
* https://fedora
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:52 AM Martin Curlej wrote:
> Hi,
>
> EOL and Obsoletes were planned as a feature of Modularity. The feature
> should enable to set shorter/longer life cycles on Modules than the OS
> release. The initial idea was to set this information in the disgit
> metadata of a Modu
Hi,
EOL and Obsoletes were planned as a feature of Modularity. The feature
should enable to set shorter/longer life cycles on Modules than the OS
release. The initial idea was to set this information in the disgit
metadata of a Module. As time went by the requirements have changed.
>From my point
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 19/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201026.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201027.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 33
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 92
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 170.79 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 10:16 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:47:42 +
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 08:33 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > > I don't know what IANAL means but sounds rude...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 00:14, Fabi
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201026.0):
ID: 707928 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On 2020-10-22 11:57, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
I think that makes sense. I usually set English even though my other
languages are well supported, because it means less mentally switching
back and forth.
Indeed. Ok with guessing defaults as far as I can immediately change them
to something
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201025.0):
ID: 707921 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 07:17:49PM +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> The MariaDB modules are available for testing right now in Rawhide and
> in BODHI. [1]
> I'll be thankful for any testing of the modules, so I can look into
> any issues that might appear, before getting the MariaDB 10.5 in the
> Fedo
28 matches
Mail list logo
