No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201127.0):
ID: 730918 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900710
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899180
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PAR-Dist-0.50-1.fc34 |perl-PAR-Dist-0.50-1.fc34
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895538
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.44 |perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.44
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899180
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
Adam Williamson wrote:
> The problem is that bridging to existing IRC channels severely dilutes
> one of the main appeals of Matrix - being more welcoming to new users
> familiar with modern chat system norms.
Maybe the way to make everyone happy would be to bridge the other way round,
i.e., an
On 11/25/20 8:51 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I am still working on updating nbconvert to 6.0.7 and more package
reviews may be "incoming".
Hi folks,
Requesting two more package reviews -
nest-asyncio: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902078
nbclient:
On 11/27/20 5:49 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
As I understand it, the Matrix-IRC bridge is "bidirectional" in the sense
that it relays messages both ways, but not in the sense that an IRC user
would be able to connect to an arbitrary Matrix channel with an IRC client
the way it allows a
Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
> False. The bridges are bidirectional.
As I understand it, the Matrix-IRC bridge is "bidirectional" in the sense
that it relays messages both ways, but not in the sense that an IRC user
would be able to connect to an arbitrary Matrix channel with an IRC client
the way
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 34 Rawhide 20201127.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 01:24:13PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Marcin Dulak:
>
> > The individual email recipients used for "Email sent to" are not
> > included in the given bug "CC list", and the only other email in the
> > bug settings seems to be "extras...@fedoraproject.org".
>
> >
On Fri, 2020-11-27 at 13:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>
> Considering that Matrix can bridge to IRC channels and not the opposite, I
> also think that moving to native Matrix mainly just degrades
> interoperatibility.
The problem is that bridging to existing IRC channels severely
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 5:07 PM Andy Mender
wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 11:57, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> openstack-sig is reviewing the list of packages maintained in Fedora and
>> we've found that following packages can be retired from Fedora as they are
>> not longer
On 11/27/20 4:53 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Considering that Matrix can bridge to IRC channels and not the opposite, I
also think that moving to native Matrix mainly just degrades
interoperatibility.
False. The bridges are bidirectional.
--
Erich Eickmeyer
Maintainer
Fedora Jam
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 4:40 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:22:25AM +, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > # GitLab AMA Session Topic - Namespace & Issue Tracking
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Thanks again for your involvement in the GitLab AMA session on IRC in
> >
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 11:57, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> openstack-sig is reviewing the list of packages maintained in Fedora and
> we've found that following packages can be retired from Fedora as they are
> not longer used or required by any other package or OpenStack:
>
>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:22:25AM +, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> # GitLab AMA Session Topic - Namespace & Issue Tracking
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks again for your involvement in the GitLab AMA session on IRC in
> September. This email discussion thread is on Namespace & Issue
> Tracking. I have
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 14:14, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 13:07:06 +0100, Andy Mender wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hiya Ankur!
>
> Hi Andy!
>
> > I reviewed your package. No swap expected, but could you push your
> > gargi-fonts package to Rawhide?
> > I'm working on an update to Widelands
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 13:07:06 +0100, Andy Mender wrote:
>
>
> Hiya Ankur!
Hi Andy!
> I reviewed your package. No swap expected, but could you push your
> gargi-fonts package to Rawhide?
> I'm working on an update to Widelands and I might need it :).
Thanks very much! I'll complete the review
Matthew Miller wrote:
> As mentioned, we're looking at moving the Fedora Council's main chat to
> Matrix. And as part of that, we're considering a hosted Element server --
> which obviously could go quite beyond just #fedora-council. Neal suggested
> a video meeting to talk with interested people
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:28:36PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jan Pazdziora:
>
> >> There's a Fedora-specific hack in rawhide glibc to bring back the
> >> __xstat and related symbols for linking. This in the process of being
> >> upstreamed.
> >
> > Does that include __fxstatat64? And is
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 11:07, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I hope everyone is safe and doing well.
>
> python-meautility is a new dependency needed to update python-lfpy to
> its latest release, so I've packaged it up and submitted a package
> review here:
* Jan Pazdziora:
> So do you recommend for fakechroot to hardcode something like
>
> --- a/src/libfakechroot.h
> +++ b/src/libfakechroot.h
> @@ -224,4 +224,14 @@ int fakechroot_try_cmd_subst (char *, const char *, char
> *);
> int snprintf(char *, size_t, const char *, ...);
> #endif
>
>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:57:38AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jan Pazdziora:
>
> > it seems that both fakeroot and fakechroot fail to build in Fedora
> > rawhide (at least partially) because _STAT_VER is no longer declared
> > in the current glibc (or rather, its headers):
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902203
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902203
Bug ID: 1902203
Summary: perl-SNMP-Info-3.71 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-SNMP-Info
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi folks,
I hope everyone is safe and doing well.
python-meautility is a new dependency needed to update python-lfpy to
its latest release, so I've packaged it up and submitted a package
review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902102
It's a standard Python package. Would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896657
Jan Pazdziora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201126.0):
ID: 729622 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
29 matches
Mail list logo
