https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910128
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910105
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-fe5f5b7782 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fe5f5b7782
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910105
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210103.0):
ID: 750418 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910105
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On 1/4/21 9:28 AM, Akashdeep Dhar wrote:
Hello,
The suggestions made here
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CXXZ6YIL22Y34SIFT6XWK3DL3FD5VCLF/
and
Hello,
The suggestions made here
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CXXZ6YIL22Y34SIFT6XWK3DL3FD5VCLF/
and
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZWSKCQ2BQD4UZJAKEDNREF3FX6RVCDAR/
are taken into account
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/01/04/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.9-1.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> So can *not touching someone else's config files*. If I've gone to the
> trouble of locally or manually editing a config file, I generally
> don't appreciate your package manually tweaking it inside your RPM
> %post scripts in an unpredictable fashion. Replace it, or
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 8:45 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > I have a project for which the config file (toml) has been significantly
> > changed, notably renamed sections. As such some older config parameters
> > won't work anymore.
>
> Tools like sed, ed, awk
Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> I have a project for which the config file (toml) has been significantly
> changed, notably renamed sections. As such some older config parameters
> won't work anymore.
Tools like sed, ed, awk etc. in %post scriptlets can do wonders.
Kevin Kofler
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 06:17:03PM +, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 18:12 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > FWIW, I also think it's time for drpms to go. Aside from any potential
> > issues with the proposed change, they haven't been useful in Fedora for
> > three years, (see
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I fail to see why this would be significantly better...
I don't claim that the "separate temporary directory of unpacked content" is
*better* - just that it's as easy to implement *and* doesn't require an RPM
format
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 3:01 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 03. 01. 21 v 20:16 Robert-André Mauchin napsal(a):
> >
> > I have a project for which the config file (toml) has been significantly
> > changed, notably renamed sections. As such some
> > older config parameters won't work anymore.
> >
Dne 03. 01. 21 v 20:16 Robert-André Mauchin napsal(a):
>
> I have a project for which the config file (toml) has been significantly
> changed, notably renamed sections. As such some
> older config parameters won't work anymore.
> However the current config file can't be overwritten because of
>
Hello,
I have a project for which the config file (toml) has been significantly
changed, notably renamed sections. As such some older config parameters
won't work anymore.
However the current config file can't be overwritten because of
config(noreplace) directive. How do I recommend my users
On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 04:13:56PM +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Jerry James wrote:
> > RPM can query ELF objects (executables and shared libraries) to find
> > DT_NEEDED fields. That gives it a list of libraries that are depended
> > on directly. It generates Requires for those dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910970
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-LDAP-0.67 is available |perl-LDAP-0.68 is
On Saturday, January 2, 2021 1:34:32 PM WET chedi toueiti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This package is a new dependency of python-molecule. Can someone take a look
> and review it please.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911296
>
> Happy to review in exchange.
Done. :-)
--
José
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/180 (x86_64), 8/122 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 6:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:43:04PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I filed https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2512 asking FESCo to move all
> > automated emails to a separate list where people who want to follow
> > can, while I
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210102.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210103.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 107
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 36.37 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Il giorno ven, 20/11/2020 alle 11.26 -0500, Ben Cotton ha scritto:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultPipeWire
>
> == Summary ==
> This change proposal is to route all audio from PulseAudio and JACK
> to
> the PipeWire Audio
> daemon by default.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name:
My experience is pretty OK with PipeWire in f33. Gaming also OK and seems like
even fixed long standing issues in some games. Overall is better in terms of
CPU utilization and quality (subjectively).
But one noticeable issue - no volume control in GNOME Shell, but it available
in System
Il 02/01/21 22:57, Kevin Kofler via devel ha scritto:
> Tom Callaway wrote:
>> I rebuilt chromium, but it did not resolve the issue.
> So what can we do to resolve the issue? Surely we cannot leave both Chromium
> and Falkon unable to render text forever.
>
> Kevin Kofler
> ___
The
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210102.0):
ID: 750102 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911914
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911158
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911353
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
29 matches
Mail list logo
