Fedora-Cloud-33-20210105.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210104.0): ID: 751715 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 1912662] perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912662 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.006-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58954468 -- You

[Bug 1912662] perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912662 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1744476 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1744476=edit [patch] Update to 1.006 (#1912662) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1912662] New: perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912662 Bug ID: 1912662 Summary: perl-Gnome2-Canvas-1.006 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Gnome2-Canvas Keywords: FutureFeature,

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-01-05 - 93% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/01/05/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.9-1.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

[Bug 1912654] New: perl-HTTP-Message-6.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912654 Bug ID: 1912654 Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.27 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTTP-Message Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[389-devel] Please review: 4517 systemd pin warning cleanup

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4518 — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs, Australia ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

csync2 is now orphaned

Hi all I have just orphaned https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/csync2 as I don't have the time to maintain it. Honestly I haven't done anything with the package for years. I have been getting notifications from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907158 about failed builds and it

[Bug 1910780] perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.023 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910780 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-fee045fac8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1910310] perl-libnet-3.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910310 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-6aba9c3436 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1910204] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.46 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910204 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e2d3150bdc has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 1906282] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906282 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29-1.fc33 |perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29-1.fc33

[Bug 1904632] perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904632 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.2 |perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.2

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d4406c9c75 awstats-7.8-2.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-001e4d949f dia-0.97.3-16.el8 The following builds have been pushed

[Bug 1904632] perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904632 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.2 |perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.2

[Bug 1906282] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906282 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29-1.fc33 |perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29-1.fc33

[Bug 1909364] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9910 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909364 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8dc1b2602a has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1908799] perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908799 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.1 |perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.1

[Bug 1821881] CVE-2013-7488 perl-Convert-ASN1: allows remote attackers to cause an infinite loop via unexpected input [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821881 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Convert-ASN1-0.27-21.f |perl-Convert-ASN1-0.27-21.f

[Bug 1909364] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9910 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909364 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2020-8e0d016a7b has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1908799] perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908799 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1910780] perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.023 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910780 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1910310] perl-libnet-3.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910310 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1910394] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910394 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1910105] perl-Net-SSH2-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910105 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1910204] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.46 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910204 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable spec file preprocessing (System-Wide Change proposal)

...snip... Btw. I posted a long comment here: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2532 basically trying to explain the proposal more and mention the use-cases where it would be useful. So, please, read if you are interested. I guess, if there is a further discussion it should be probably carried out

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable spec file preprocessing (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 20:43, Dan Čermák wrote: > > clime writes: > > > ...snip... > >> > > >> > $ preproc-rpmspec pkg.spec.rpkg # prints rendered spec to stdout, > >> > pkg.spec.rpkg is a spec template > >> > >> This would be a viable workaround, but a workaround nevertheless. Since > >> I am

Re: Delta RPMs in Fedora 34

On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 06:29:13PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 10:21:15PM +, Matthew Almond via devel wrote: > > There's been a lot of interesting talk about the state and future of > > drpm. I'd like to propose we continue the conversation about that with > > a

Re: Delta RPMs in Fedora 34

On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 10:21:15PM +, Matthew Almond via devel wrote: > There's been a lot of interesting talk about the state and future of > drpm. I'd like to propose we continue the conversation about that with > a different subject line :) Okay, fair. I have a proposal. Right now, the

[Bug 1912612] New: perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912612 Bug ID: 1912612 Summary: perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTTP-Cookies Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Fedora 34 Change: LTO Build Improvements (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 1/4/21 11:28 AM, Jeff Law wrote: On 1/4/21 12:22 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/30/20 11:52 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements == Summary == Currently all packages that are not opted out of LTO include -ffat-lto-objects in their build flags. 

Delta RPMs in Fedora 34

On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 11:25 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 03:25:29PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I remember when drpms landed I heard people say they choose Fedora > > because of them. That may have changed over the years I guess. :) > > and there have been only 2 or 3

Re: Fedora 34 Change: DNF/RPM Copy on Write enablement for all variants (System-Wide Change)

On Sun, 2021-01-03 at 16:16 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > I fail to see why this would be significantly better... > > I don't claim that the "separate temporary directory of unpacked > content" is *better* - just that

Re: Fedora kernel, from version 5.7.6 no longer works on AMD Navi 10 GPUs for PPC64el

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 2:39 PM Maurizio Mileto wrote: > > Hello everyone, I would like to resume this discourse because unfortunately > after months of reports, unfortunately no solution has yet been reached. I > wanted to say once again to you all Fedora staff that unfortunately, on >

Fedora kernel, from version 5.7.6 no longer works on AMD Navi 10 GPUs for PPC64el

Hello everyone, I would like to resume this discourse because unfortunately after months of reports, unfortunately no solution has yet been reached. I wanted to say once again to you all Fedora staff that unfortunately, on PowerPC64le architecture, since the Kernel moved from version 5.6.19 to

Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

On 11/30/20 2:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, As part of the f34 change request[1] for removing make from the buildroot, I will be doing a mass update of packages[2] to add BuildRequires: make where it is needed. If you are a package maintainer and would prefer to update your packages on

[Bug 1912587] New: please build an EPEL8 build for perl-X11-Protocol and perl-X11-Protocol-Other

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912587 Bug ID: 1912587 Summary: please build an EPEL8 build for perl-X11-Protocol and perl-X11-Protocol-Other Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW

[EPEL-devel] Re: %{python3} no defined in epel-7-aarch64?

* Miro Hrončok: > Yes. The macro was added to EPEL 7 only after aarch64 was discontinued there: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YVLZGTBBW2M3GMXHLIA2QMKENBEGPEJY/ > > No easy way to solve this except to stop building for aarch64 on

Re: Copr in 2020 and outlook for 2021

On 04. 01. 21 20:53, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 04. 01. 21 20:48, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 04. 01. 21 v 20:14 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): Is there any chance we could vote for GitHub Actions enablement instead of Travis? Currently we run a Fedora Docker image on top of the Ubuntu host, which is less

Re: %{python3} no defined in epel-7-aarch64?

On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 17:38 +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > I have used copr to build the first alpha release of lyx-2.4: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jamatos/lyx-devel/build/1858028/ > > > For EPEL7 it build for x86_64 and it fails for aarch64, due to > %{python3} not being

Re: Copr in 2020 and outlook for 2021

On 04. 01. 21 20:48, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 04. 01. 21 v 20:14 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): Is there any chance we could vote for GitHub Actions enablement instead of Travis? Currently we run a Fedora Docker image on top of the Ubuntu host, which is less than ideal in some cases (e.g., filesystem

Re: Copr in 2020 and outlook for 2021

Dne 04. 01. 21 v 20:14 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): >> Is there any >> chance we could vote for GitHub Actions enablement instead of Travis? >> Currently we run a Fedora Docker image on top of the Ubuntu host, >> which is less than ideal in some cases (e.g., filesystem package >> upgrades...). > > I

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable spec file preprocessing (System-Wide Change proposal)

clime writes: > ...snip... >> > >> > $ preproc-rpmspec pkg.spec.rpkg # prints rendered spec to stdout, >> > pkg.spec.rpkg is a spec template >> >> This would be a viable workaround, but a workaround nevertheless. Since >> I am not frequently rebuilding Fedora rpms outside of mock, koji & copr,

Re: Copr in 2020 and outlook for 2021

Dne 04. 01. 21 v 20:36 Dan Čermák napsal(a): > Is it intentional that google asks me to sign in? I don't actually have > a google account. Yes. It is intentional. The motivation is that you can change your vote later. If you do not have google account then just write me an email. I will add it

[EPEL-devel] Re: %{python3} no defined in epel-7-aarch64?

On 04. 01. 21 18:38, José Abílio Matos wrote: I have used copr to build the first alpha release of lyx-2.4: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jamatos/lyx-devel/build/1858028/ For EPEL7 it build for x86_64 and

Re: %{python3} no defined in epel-7-aarch64?

On 04. 01. 21 18:38, José Abílio Matos wrote: I have used copr to build the first alpha release of lyx-2.4: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jamatos/lyx-devel/build/1858028/ For EPEL7 it build for x86_64 and

Re: Copr in 2020 and outlook for 2021

Hi, Miroslav Suchý writes: > Let me sum up what we - the Copr team - did in 2020: > > * We enabled CDN for repos. https://fedora-copr.github.io/posts/copr-cdn > > * We enabled runtime dependecies on repositories > https://fedora-copr.github.io/posts/runtime-dependencies > > * We migrated

Re: Fedora 34 Change: LTO Build Improvements (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 1/2/21 10:39 AM, Ian McInerney wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 5:33 PM Jeff Law > wrote: > > > > On 12/30/20 3:48 PM, Ian McInerney wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 7:54 PM Ben Cotton > >

Re: Fedora 34 Change: LTO Build Improvements (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 1/4/21 12:22 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 12/30/20 11:52 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements >> >> >> == Summary == >> Currently all packages that are not opted out of LTO include >> -ffat-lto-objects in their build flags.  This proposal would

Re: Fedora 34 Change: LTO Build Improvements (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 12/30/20 11:52 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements == Summary == Currently all packages that are not opted out of LTO include -ffat-lto-objects in their build flags. This proposal would remove -ffat-lto-objects from the default LTO flags and

Re: Copr in 2020 and outlook for 2021

On 04. 01. 21 18:40, Alexander Scheel wrote: * Native support for Fedora in Travis. Travis has made a lot of changes to how OSS projects can use it, and (IMO) burnt a lot of good will in the community. All of our upstream projects ended up moving off it and onto GitHub Actions. Is there any

[Bug 1910970] perl-LDAP-0.68 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910970 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

Fedora-IoT-33-20210104.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201226.0): ID: 751283 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/751283 Old failures (same test failed in

Re: runtime dependencies not in Requires spec section

Rex Dieter wrote: > It's a linked library, so *yes*, rpmbuild will add it. Depends on whether the application links directly to libQt5Svg.so.5 or whether it uses it only through the plugin-based imageformats API (libqsvg.so). (And there's also the iconengines/libqsvgicon.so plugin.)

pghmcfc pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (master). "Update to 1.3 (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2021-01-04 17:58:43 UTC From 7344b951f09c4b41d8b4ff34561a98a599e768b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Jan 04 2021 17:57:59 + Subject: Update to 1.3 - New upstream release 1.3 - Do not leak memory on unsuccessful recv - Use %license

Fedora 34 Change: Localization measurement and tooling (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LocalizationMeasurementAndTooling == Summary == Provide a public website for end users and contributors, containing Fedora Workstation translation progress and useful files for translators (as an example: translation memories). == Owner == * Name:

Fedora 34 Change: LXQt 0.16.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.16.0 == Summary == Update LXQt to 0.16.0 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt just released with a bunch of bugfixes. It's always good to keep Fedora users

Fedora 34 Change: Localization measurement and tooling (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LocalizationMeasurementAndTooling == Summary == Provide a public website for end users and contributors, containing Fedora Workstation translation progress and useful files for translators (as an example: translation memories). == Owner == * Name:

Fedora 34 Change: LXQt 0.16.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LXQt_0.16.0 == Summary == Update LXQt to 0.16.0 in Fedora. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Zsun|Zamir SUN]] * Email: zsun#AT#fedoraproject.org == Detailed Description == LXQt just released with a bunch of bugfixes. It's always good to keep Fedora users

Re: Copr in 2020 and outlook for 2021

Congrats! I can say I've used several of these features and they work well, thanks for your team's work! One query inline... :) On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:53 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Let me sum up what we - the Copr team - did in 2020: > > * We enabled CDN for repos.

%{python3} no defined in epel-7-aarch64?

I have used copr to build the first alpha release of lyx-2.4: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jamatos/lyx-devel/build/1858028/ For EPEL7 it build for x86_64 and it fails for aarch64, due to %{python3} not being defined. The spec file has BR: python3-devel. In the install stage I have

[Bug 1909861] perl-Date-HolidayParser-0.43 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909861 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Copr in 2020 and outlook for 2021

Let me sum up what we - the Copr team - did in 2020: * We enabled CDN for repos. https://fedora-copr.github.io/posts/copr-cdn * We enabled runtime dependecies on repositories https://fedora-copr.github.io/posts/runtime-dependencies * We migrated all our servers from PHX datacenter to AWS.

[Bug 1909861] perl-Date-HolidayParser-0.43 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909861 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: Fedora 34 Change: DNF/RPM Copy on Write enablement for all variants (System-Wide Change)

On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 03:25:29PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I remember when drpms landed I heard people say they choose Fedora > because of them. That may have changed over the years I guess. :) > and there have been only 2 or 3 reports about how few drpms exist > in the last few years (ie,

Fedora-Rawhide-20210104.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 9/180 (x86_64), 7/122 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: Fedora 34 Change: LTO Build Improvements (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 1/4/21 2:27 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > >>> A lot of the existing RPM post-processing steps detect, report, and >>> ignore errors because the generated RPM package might still be partially >>> useful. >> True, but ignoring the error in this case runs the very real risk that a >> package could

[Bug 1910780] perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.023 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910780 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-f46734aa7b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f46734aa7b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[EPEL-devel] Re: Version of gcc in EPEL7

On Monday, January 4, 2021 3:30:20 PM WET Troy Dawson wrote: > [root@centos7 ~]# g++ -dumpversion > 4.8.5 > [root@centos7 ~]# g++ -dumpfullversion > g++: fatal error: no input files > compilation terminated. > [root@centos7 ~]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/g++ > gcc-c++-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64 Thank you. :-) --

[EPEL-devel] Re: Version of gcc in EPEL7

On 1/4/21 5:19 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: Hi, last week I have compiled the first alpha release of LyX 2.4 in copr. As I have been doing in other cases I have built the package in EPEL 7 and 8, together with the supported Fedora versions and rawhide. The code only failed in EPEL 7. In a

Re: openvdb-8.0.0 so version change

On 26. 12. 20 23:24, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Hello team, openvdb-8.0.0 is released upstream meaning the soversion is now 8.0 resulting a break on dependent packages like OpenImageIO and Blender as tested on COPR blender[1].  The commit is already complete

[Bug 1910780] perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.023 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910780 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Fedora-IoT-34-20210104.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210102.0): ID: 751234 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/751234 ID:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Version of gcc in EPEL7

[root@centos7 ~]# g++ -dumpversion 4.8.5 [root@centos7 ~]# g++ -dumpfullversion g++: fatal error: no input files compilation terminated. [root@centos7 ~]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/g++ gcc-c++-4.8.5-44.el7.x86_64 On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 7:20 AM José Abílio Matos wrote: > > Hi, > > last week I have

[EPEL-devel] Version of gcc in EPEL7

Hi, last week I have compiled the first alpha release of LyX 2.4 in copr. As I have been doing in other cases I have built the package in EPEL 7 and 8, together with the supported Fedora versions and rawhide. The code only failed in EPEL 7. In a sense this was to be expected since the code

Bugzilla error when saving

I was trying to add an issue to this bug but I keep on getting a jira error: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1912472 Thanks, Richard --- There was an error reported for the RPC call to Jira: There was an error reported for a GitHub REST call. URL:

[Bug 1910780] perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.023 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910780 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|---

[Bug 1910394] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910394 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-7fdf29563e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7fdf29563e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1910394] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910394 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: Thoughts about packaging a standalone python-PyQt5-sip?

Scott Talbert wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jan 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I think fundamentally the version of PyQt5-sip probably needs to match > (or be very close to) the version of sip that PyQt5 itself was > compiled with. I think for calibre (which is currently failing with):

Re: runtime dependencies not in Requires spec section

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 30.12.2020 22:49, Germano Massullo wrote: >> My question is: how can keepassxc trigger the installation of such >> libraries if the spec file does not contain any Requires dependency that >> should be the attribute to identify runtime dependencies that are

[Bug 1910394] perl-Devel-PatchPerl-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910394 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1910310] perl-libnet-3.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910310 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-819abf0dbb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-819abf0dbb --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---

[Bug 1910310] perl-libnet-3.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910310 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-819abf0dbb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-819abf0dbb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210104.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210103.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210104.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 67 Added packages: 30 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 95 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 5.70 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

[Bug 1910310] perl-libnet-3.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910310 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1906256] perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906256 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA Doc Type|---

Re: Unannounced soname bump: ldns

On 04. 01. 21 13:14, Petr Menšík wrote: On 1/4/21 12:38 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 04. 01. 21 12:26, Petr Menšík wrote: I had not time to coordinate rebuilt before Christmas, so I left it intentionally without build. It was built by Jeff Law one day before I departed to vacation. I haven't

Re: Unannounced soname bump: ldns

On 1/4/21 12:38 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 01. 21 12:26, Petr Menšík wrote: >> I had not time to coordinate rebuilt before Christmas, so I left it >> intentionally without build. It was built by Jeff Law one day before I >> departed to vacation. I haven't noticed that. > > As a matter of

Re: How to handle a config(noreplace) file that needs to be updated

On 1/4/21 2:44 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Robert-André Mauchin wrote: I have a project for which the config file (toml) has been significantly changed, notably renamed sections. As such some older config parameters won't work anymore. Tools like sed, ed, awk etc. in %post scriptlets

[Bug 1910310] perl-libnet-3.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910310 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1910204] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.46 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910204 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e2d3150bdc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e2d3150bdc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1837988] CVE-2020-10878 perl: corruption of intermediate language state of compiled regular expression due to integer overflow leads to DoS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837988 msidd...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(msiddiqu@redhat.c | |om)

Re: How to handle a config(noreplace) file that needs to be updated

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 8:16 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a project for which the config file (toml) has been significantly > changed, notably renamed sections. As such some older config parameters > won't work anymore. > However the current config file can't be overwritten

Re: Unannounced soname bump: ldns

On 04. 01. 21 12:26, Petr Menšík wrote: I had not time to coordinate rebuilt before Christmas, so I left it intentionally without build. It was built by Jeff Law one day before I departed to vacation. I haven't noticed that. As a matter of opinion (i.e. this is not a policy, but my own views),

Re: Planned Outage - taiga - 2021-01-05 07:00 UTC

On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 05:33:08PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > There will be an outage starting at 2021-01-05 07:00 UTC > which will last approximately 3 hours. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto > or run: > date -d

Re: Unannounced soname bump: ldns

I am sorry for that. I had not time to coordinate rebuilt before Christmas, so I left it intentionally without build. It was built by Jeff Law one day before I departed to vacation. I haven't noticed that. Jeff, were there any specific reason behind your build? It would be nice, if you tried to

[rpms/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK] PR #1: SELinux policy for Libvirt-TCK

berrange commented on the pull-request: `SELinux policy for Libvirt-TCK ` that you are following: `` Thanks for this, however, we have a strictly upstream-first policy for libvirt, so can't take this kind of thing as a Fedora patch. Please can you send it upstream as a patch to the real

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable spec file preprocessing (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 09:14:40PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 8:06 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Enable_Spec_File_Preprocessing > > > > > > == Summary == > > This change should enable an opt-in spec file preprocessor in Fedora > >

  1   2   >