[Bug 1922738] New: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS-0.12 is available

2021-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922738 Bug ID: 1922738 Summary: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS-0.12 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CSS-Minifier-XS Keywords: FutureFeature,

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-01-31 - 95% PASS

2021-01-30 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/01/31/report-389-ds-base-2.0.2-20210131git95201aa83.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1922716] New: perl-Log-ger-0.038 is available

2021-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922716 Bug ID: 1922716 Summary: perl-Log-ger-0.038 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Log-ger Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2021-01-30 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 44 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a9fc09599 openjpeg2-2.3.1-10.el7 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f1768ebc94 opensmtpd-6.8.0p2-1.el7 6

[Bug 1918641] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210120 is available

2021-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918641 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2021-01-30 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-83ab5bb91b opensmtpd-6.8.0p2-1.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b68969af8c chromium-88.0.4324.96-1.el8 3

[Bug 1917309] Please include missing argument files in package

2021-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917309 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1918698] Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 12.15

2021-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918698 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Help for FTBFS packages: apcupsd and firefox-pkcs11-loader

2021-01-30 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On 1/30/21 7:37 PM, Germano Massullo wrote: I tried fixing apcupsd and firefox-pkcs11-loader that started to fail after introduction of "CMake to do out-of-source builds", but I got some errors about missing files, that is strange since package structure has not changed, it's the same that

Re: Help for FTBFS packages: apcupsd and firefox-pkcs11-loader

2021-01-30 Thread Germano Massullo
apcupsd package has been fixed by Jason L Tibbitts III ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL9 - thoughts and timings

2021-01-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:46:56PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:29 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 03:15:29PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > I think that could be workable, but I'll toss out another proposal: > > > > > > As soon as centos 9 stream

Re: Test timeouts in Fedora Copr emulated envs

2021-01-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:08:18PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 03:26:18PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > When we attempt to build libvirt in Copr, the test suite times out on > > s390 builds. > > > > IIUC, this is because s390 in Copr is using a QEMU emulated system,

Re: Test timeouts in Fedora Copr emulated envs

2021-01-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 03:26:18PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > When we attempt to build libvirt in Copr, the test suite times out on > s390 builds. > > IIUC, this is because s390 in Copr is using a QEMU emulated system, > not native hardware, and thus is massively slower to execute. > >

Re: bootstrapping without .spec modification

2021-01-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 03:49:28PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Currently a Koji task says: > > Source: > git+https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.9.git#563b4f4b59a9f81095acfe30899fdc4b040c1b9b > Build Target: f34-rebuild > Options: > fail_fast = True > wait_builds = > > Example

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 30.01.2021 um 19:41 schrieb Fabio Valentini : > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 7:24 PM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> >> >>> Am 30.01.2021 um 17:45 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel >>> : >>> >>> On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote: But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation or Server

FedoraRespin-33-updates-20210129.0 compose check report

2021-01-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Soas live x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Xfce live x86_64 Mate live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/19 (x86_64) ID: 765677 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/765677 ID: 765687 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread clime
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 20:03, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 30.01.2021 18:50, clime wrote: > > Hey, what do you mean by this? > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/alternatives/ > > > Why should scriplets usage be incompatible with immutable Fedora > > releases? > >

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread clime
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 19:48, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 7:24 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 30.01.2021 um 17:45 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > > : > > > > > > On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote: > > >> But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation

[Bug 1922652] New: perl-Template-Tiny-1.13 is available

2021-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922652 Bug ID: 1922652 Summary: perl-Template-Tiny-1.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Template-Tiny Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 30.01.2021 18:50, clime wrote: Hey, what do you mean by this? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/alternatives/ Why should scriplets usage be incompatible with immutable Fedora releases? rpm-ostree doesn't execute any scriptlets. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 30.01.2021 19:24, Peter Boy wrote: Thanks for the info. Unfortunately, I don’t see a connection to immutable Fedora (it is about drop-in, user configurable, etc). Or do I miss something? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/alternatives/ -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 7:24 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am 30.01.2021 um 17:45 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > : > > > > On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote: > >> But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation or Server and almost > >> indispensable for some development projects,

Help for FTBFS packages: apcupsd and firefox-pkcs11-loader

2021-01-30 Thread Germano Massullo
I tried fixing apcupsd and firefox-pkcs11-loader that started to fail after introduction of "CMake to do out-of-source builds", but I got some errors about missing files, that is strange since package structure has not changed, it's the same that built successfully on older Fedora branches

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 30.01.2021 um 17:45 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > : > > On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote: >> But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation or Server and almost >> indispensable for some development projects, e.g. Java (and vi/vim for a >> terminal environment). Why should

Re: Policy proposal (draft): Don't push knowingly broken or work-in-progress work to dist git

2021-01-30 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
clime wrote: > So if some other maintainer pushes his work to the server meanwhile, > this will just delete his work? Or what's the idea here? I guess the safe thing to do would be to wait and see whether that commit also fails to build (i.e., if the CI build fails, check whether the built

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210129.n.0 changes

2021-01-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:45:42PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30. 01. 21 0:16, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:49 PM Fedora Rawhide Report > > wrote: > > > > > > > (snip) > > > > > > > > Package: golang-torproject-pluggable-transports-goptlib-1.1.0-6.fc34 > > >

Re: Policy proposal (draft): Don't push knowingly broken or work-in-progress work to dist git

2021-01-30 Thread clime
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 01:28, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Alternative: use automated reverts instead of force pushes, and don't > > worry about maintaining a clean history. > > Sure, it is possible to make an implementation with lower quality of > implementation

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread clime
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 16:08, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 29.01.2021 09:49, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > I'm currently trying to rewrite the current shell aliases for making > > Vi/View/Vim use the correct compiled binary based on which Vim package > > is installed. > > Alternatives are

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote: But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation or Server and almost indispensable for some development projects, e.g. Java (and vi/vim for a terminal environment). Why should alternatives not be usable there? Or what is a suitable and adequate

Re: Policy proposal (draft): Don't push knowingly broken or work-in-progress work to dist git

2021-01-30 Thread Dan Čermák
Kevin Kofler via devel writes: > Matthew Miller wrote: >> Yeah, honestly, this is also a pretty serious hardship for the long tail >> of people maintaining a handful of infrequently updated packages. I'm >> hugely in favor of not checking in work in progress on the main or release >> branches,

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread Peter Boy
> Am 30.01.2021 um 15:58 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > : > > On 29.01.2021 09:49, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> I'm currently trying to rewrite the current shell aliases for making >> Vi/View/Vim use the correct compiled binary based on which Vim package >> is installed. > > Alternatives are

Re: Fedora 34 Change: uEFI for ARMv7 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-01-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:46 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 6:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:28 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > > >

Fedora stand "Welcome Session" chat sign-up for FOSDEM 2021

2021-01-30 Thread Ben Cotton
Next weekend is "FOSDEM [1] weekend" and The Fedora Project is going to be there with a virtual stand! [2] We will have our own stand/ page where people will be able to "pass by" and join the Fedora chat to ask questions. Please keep an eye during the next few days on both the CommunityBlog and

Re: [Help wanted] Setting vi/view/vim via alternatives

2021-01-30 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 29.01.2021 09:49, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: I'm currently trying to rewrite the current shell aliases for making Vi/View/Vim use the correct compiled binary based on which Vim package is installed. Alternatives are not suitable for Fedora, because they will break immutable Fedora releases due

Fedora-Rawhide-20210130.n.0 compose check report

2021-01-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 34/181 (x86_64), 40/123

Re: fedpkg output dir

2021-01-30 Thread Otto Urpelainen
Fabio Valentini kirjoitti 30.1.2021 klo 12.37: On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:19 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote: Jonathan Wakely kirjoitti 29.1.2021 klo 18.22: On 29/01/21 17:04 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 01. 21 16:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote: So if fedpkg clone just added things to

Fedora-IoT-34-20210130.0 compose check report

2021-01-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 4/16 (x86_64), 8/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210129.0): ID: 765593 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/765593 ID: 765596

Re: fedpkg output dir

2021-01-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:37:27AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:19 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote: > > > > Jonathan Wakely kirjoitti 29.1.2021 klo 18.22: > > > On 29/01/21 17:04 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > >> On 29. 01. 21 16:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > >>> > > >>> So

[Bug 1917453] perl-Git-Repository-1.324-5.fc34 FTBFS: t/24-errors.t fails 'warnings: 0' test with a new git 2.30.0

2021-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917453 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

Re: Fedora 34 Change: uEFI for ARMv7 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-01-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 6:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:28 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARMv7UEFI > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > Move ARMv7 to use UEFI as

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210129.n.0 changes

2021-01-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 01. 21 0:16, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:49 PM Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: (snip) Package: golang-torproject-pluggable-transports-goptlib-1.1.0-6.fc34 Old package: golang-torproject-pluggable-transports-goptlib-1.1.0-5.fc33 Summary: Library for

Re: Fedora 34 Change: uEFI for ARMv7 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-01-30 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 11:28 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARMv7UEFI > > > > == Summary == > > > > Move ARMv7 to use UEFI as default for all armhfp generated images > > > > == Owner == > > * Name:

Re: Fedora 34 Change: uEFI for ARMv7 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-01-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARMv7UEFI > > == Summary == > > Move ARMv7 to use UEFI as default for all armhfp generated images > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]] > * Email: pbrobinson at fedoraproject dot

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210130.n.0 changes

2021-01-30 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210129.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210130.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 134 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 115.61 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: fedpkg output dir

2021-01-30 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:19 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote: > > Jonathan Wakely kirjoitti 29.1.2021 klo 18.22: > > On 29/01/21 17:04 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 29. 01. 21 16:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >>> > >>> So if fedpkg clone just added things to .git/info/exclude there would > >>> be no

fedpkg output dir

2021-01-30 Thread Otto Urpelainen
Jonathan Wakely kirjoitti 29.1.2021 klo 18.22: On 29/01/21 17:04 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 01. 21 16:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote: So if fedpkg clone just added things to .git/info/exclude there would be no need to modify every .gitignore file in every repo on every active branch. That