No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210322.0):
ID: 826126 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826126
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64),
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 1:40:11 AM WET Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Please keep in mind that Linus Torvalds himself announced his project with
> the words: "It is NOT protable" [sic] "(uses 386 task switching etc),". [1]
> The portability came much later, after major changes (such as rewritin
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210322.0):
ID: 826137 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
This is possible. I've been having issues with my laptop and booted a
number of times. I am fine now. TY
Carol
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 7:49 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:34 PM Carol Bouchard
> wrote:
> >
> > I saw this error just before my upgrade to fedora33 and I'm
OLD: Fedora-34-20210322.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210323.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 44
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 61.08 MiB
Size of dropped packages:14.84 MiB
Fedora Linux 34 Beta Released
--
The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of Fedora 34 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora 34 release
at the end of April.
Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site:
* Get Fedora
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
>
> redir orphan 2 weeks ago
While redir (version 2.2.1) [0] is a stale project (as far as I can
Hi,
I have a trivial python package (re-assert) to review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941362
needed for pre-commit tests.
Happy to review in exchange.
Regards,
--
*Chedi Toueiti*
* Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be
responsible for the
Done.
вт, 23 мар. 2021 г. в 17:32, chedi toueiti :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a trivial python package (re-assert) to review:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941362
>
> needed for pre-commit tests.
>
> Happy to review in exchange.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Chedi Toueiti
>
> * Due to the const
Hi Everyone,
Please note there will be an outage from 1030 UTC tomorrow, Wednesday 24th
March until end of day 25th March (time TBD) to facilitate the deployment
and configuration of the new Fedora Accounts system in production.
In case you missed it, some mails went out on Friday 19th March & an
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/187 (x86_64), 9/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210322.n.0):
ID: 826340 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826340
ID: 826346 Test: x86
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-03-24 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
> Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9788/
>
Ther
On 08.03.21 11:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> php-deepdiver-zipstreamer orphan 0
> weeks ago
> php-opencloud-openstack orphan 0
> weeks ago
I've taken these, I will need them for nextcloud
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-03-24 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
hi,
is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
a package in a Fedora repo?
This project is meant:
https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA/blob/master/LICENSE
Example license for voices:
https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA-voices/blob/master/data/de1/license.txt
be
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:42 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
> a package in a Fedora repo?
>
> This project is meant:
>
> https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA/blob/master/LICENSE
>
> Example license for voices:
>
> https:
Marius Schwarz wrote:
> is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
> a package in a Fedora repo?
The AGPL is acceptable for Fedora, *but*…
> This project is meant:
>
> https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA/blob/master/LICENSE
… MBROLA is *not*, because…
> Example l
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:18 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Marius Schwarz wrote:
> > is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
> > a package in a Fedora repo?
>
> The AGPL is acceptable for Fedora, *but*…
>
> > This project is meant:
> >
> > https://github.com
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> This is the reason why MBROLA is not in Fedora. MBROLA is not new. It is
> much older than the 2-year-old GitHub project. The license of the voices
> has always been the blocker.
PS: This was already discussed when the GitHub project was created in 2019:
https://lis
Hi Zlatan, welcome to the Spins mailing list! It is good to see you
here. Sounds like you are doing interesting work.
Out of curiosity, have you thought of using existing Fedora Spins or
Editions in Shells.com, such as Fedora IoT Edition, Fedora KDE Spin, or
Fedora i3 Spin?
For packaging help and
20 matches
Mail list logo
