On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 08:49:16PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On to, 25 maalis 2021, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:30:56PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >>On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:10:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>> https://pagure.io/login/?next=https:
On to, 25 maalis 2021, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:30:56PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:10:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://pagure.io/login/?next=https://pagure.io/
>
> It says:
>
> "No email address was returned by your OpenID p
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:30:56PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:10:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://pagure.io/login/?next=https://pagure.io/
> >
> > It says:
> >
> > "No email address was returned by your OpenID provider, this
> > information is manda
Hi Everyone,
The title means that we are 1.5 days into our original planned disruption
period but some of the configurations were more complex and has resulted in
our team falling behind on completion.
We are still actively working on the production deployment of the new
Fedora Accounts System, bu
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 6:31 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:10:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://pagure.io/login/?next=https://pagure.io/
> >
> > It says:
> >
> > "No email address was returned by your OpenID provider, this
> > information is mandatory for
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:10:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://pagure.io/login/?next=https://pagure.io/
> It says:
> "No email address was returned by your OpenID provider, this
> information is mandatory for pagure"
In case you weren't aware, this is likely a glitch resulting from
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:10:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://pagure.io/login/?next=https://pagure.io/
>
> It says:
>
> "No email address was returned by your OpenID provider, this
> information is mandatory for pagure"
Yeah. I'm seeing this too when testing in a private window.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:13:15PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Could you please file an issue about that here:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues ?
Since I can't log in... no.
Rich.
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 1:11 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > https://pagure.io/login/?nex
Could you please file an issue about that here:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues ?
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 1:11 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> https://pagure.io/login/?next=https://pagure.io/
>
> It says:
>
> "No email address was returned by your OpenID provider, this
> informa
https://pagure.io/login/?next=https://pagure.io/
It says:
"No email address was returned by your OpenID provider, this
information is mandatory for pagure"
which I cannot find anything by search. I've cleared cookies and all
that. I'm assuming my "OpenID provider" is
https://accounts.fedorapr
Currently, we are trying to stay away from the compat package and with the
help of other package maintainers trying to fix the failures. We will give
time to react accordingly and see other possible steps in a few weeks time.
Currently multiple FTBFS bugs in bugzilla were created according to
auto
Not yet, will keep you updated when it will be created.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:34 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Does the koji side tag exist yet?
>
> --
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
>
> in your fear, seek onl
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-03-11 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2021-03-25 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2021-03-25 1
On Thu, Mar 25 2021 at 09:26:19 AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
For now, keep nss-myhostname at the start of the line, right after
files. We will probably need to find a way to either (a) fix
systemd-resolved to handle mDNS properly, so we can move it after
nss-resolve, where it really belo
On 3/25/21 10:21 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25 2021 at 08:37:03 AM -0400, Robert Marcano via devel
wrote:
IMHO the fedora name should be always resolvable the same way as
localhost or just remove it. It is not right thsat fedora is being
resolved only while the DHCP server isn't
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 7:51 PM Robert Marcano via devel
wrote:
> Maybe changing the default hostname to fedora wasn't a good idea after
> all, or at least fedora should be added to the default /etc/hosts.
Note that setting the hostname to "fedora" also led to log spam, for
me at least:
https://
On Thu, Mar 25 2021 at 09:26:19 AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
We spent a long time thinking about the order the NSS modules should
be listed, but then made a last-minute change to move
nss-mdns4_minimal forward in order to work around a bug with
systemd-resolved not handling mDNS properly
Does the koji side tag exist yet?
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:02 AM, Ondrej D
OK, so then the problem here is avahi, or more specifically, that
nss-mdns4_minimal is listed before nss-resolve and nss-myhostname. We
need nss-myhostname to come before nss-mdns4_minimal. Drat. We spent a
long time thinking about the order the NSS modules should be listed,
but then made a l
On Thu, Mar 25 2021 at 08:37:03 AM -0400, Robert Marcano via devel
wrote:
IMHO the fedora name should be always resolvable the same way as
localhost or just remove it. It is not right thsat fedora is being
resolved only while the DHCP server isn't assigning you a new
hostname.
You never know
gcompris-qt changed license from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3 in version 1.1 because
they used a library for analog electricity activity under AGPLv3 causing
the whole software to be licensed under it.
Regards,
Andrea
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro
Hi,
there might be some "false negatives". If the packages are successfully
built in the given copr, please close the trackers. In most cases the FTBFS
bugs are relevant.
Thank you.
Ondrej
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 1:57 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
>
> eg:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
eg:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943008
"coccinelle: FTBFS with upcoming autoconf-2.71"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943041
"ocaml-curses: FTBFS with upcoming autoconf-2.71"
I followed the links given in both, but as far as I can tell the
builds succeeded in both
On 3/24/21 9:51 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
Currently I am connecting to a VPN that provides a few DNS search
entries. One of these domains on the search path is having DNS
resolution problems. This is not per se the the problem I am writing
this email for.
The problem is that starting Firefox
On 3/25/21 7:30 AM, Petr Menšík wrote:
Hi,
I would guess your domainname is not (none), and hostname -f value is
fedora.domain_failing.tld. One of fixes might be to change hostname of
the machine to not contain domains suffix. Then only explicitly
configured search would apply.
No:
# hostname
On 3/24/21 11:26 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple different ideas of what could be going wrong. Let's test
a few things. First, please run:
$ cat /etc/nsswitch.conf | grep hosts | tail -1
If it is our default configuration, it should say:
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUN
Hi,
I would guess your domainname is not (none), and hostname -f value is
fedora.domain_failing.tld. One of fixes might be to change hostname of
the machine to not contain domains suffix. Then only explicitly
configured search would apply.
On 3/25/21 2:51 AM, Robert Marcano via devel wrote:
> Cur
On 25/03/2021 09:59, Marius Schwarz wrote:
the IETF has now deprecated TLS 1.0 and 1.1 .
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8996/
Do we plan an official Old-TLS-Deactivation date or do gnutls and
openssl decide when it's time to deactivate them?
They were removed from the default crypto po
Hi,
the IETF has now deprecated TLS 1.0 and 1.1 .
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8996/
Do we plan an official Old-TLS-Deactivation date or do gnutls and
openssl decide when it's time to deactivate them?
Best regards,
Marius
___
devel mailing
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210324.0):
ID: 828916 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210324.0):
ID: 828895 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
31 matches
Mail list logo
