Outreachy 2021 applicant

Hello everyone :) I hope everyone is doing good in this pandemic. Myself Kunal Prakash. 2nd year student from NIT Patna. I am experienced with Javascript, React, Redux, CSS. I come across "Improve Fedora QA Dashboard" project. I really liked the project and want to contribute to it. Thank you.

qa-devel mailing list

prerna.singh050...@gmail.com ___ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: Fedora Account Migration & Production Deployment Update: COMPLETE!

On 3/29/21 6:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:02:58PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: I'd like us to add security query/respond pairs. Those can very easily weaken security, as the answers are often public and easy for an attacker to look up, especially

[Bug 1941280] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210320 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941280 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021

[Bug 1941284] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210320 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941284 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-HTTP-6.21-1.fc35 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.21-1.fc35

[Bug 1941284] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210320 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941284 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

[Bug 1941280] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210320 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941280 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021

[Bug 1940699] perl-Net-HTTP-6.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940699 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-HTTP-6.21-1.fc35 |perl-Net-HTTP-6.21-1.fc35

Re: Planet -> WeMakeFedora.org RMS: what are people saying?

On 30/03/2021 01:37, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 30/03/2021 01:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:25:17PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:07:28AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: It is a strange coincidence that Planet Fedora has stopped

[Bug 1942024] perl-Session-Storage-Secure-1.000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942024 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Libavif SONAME bump

On 3/29/21 11:35 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:11 PM Robert-André Mauchin > wrote: On 3/29/21 10:56 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Can you do it now instead of waiting until next week? Next week starts > the F34 Final Freeze which

[Bug 1941857] perl-Net-Amazon-S3-0.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941857 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1941705] perl-Template-Alloy-1.022 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941705 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1941280] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210320 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941280 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Planet -> WeMakeFedora.org RMS: what are people saying?

On 30/03/2021 01:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:25:17PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:07:28AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> >>> It is a strange coincidence that Planet Fedora has stopped syndicating >>> the blogs of volunteers in the same week

Re: Planet -> WeMakeFedora.org RMS: what are people saying?

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:25:17PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:07:28AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > > It is a strange coincidence that Planet Fedora has stopped syndicating > > the blogs of volunteers in the same week that Red Hat stopped[1] funding > > the FSF. >

Re: Planet -> WeMakeFedora.org RMS: what are people saying?

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 01:07:28AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > It is a strange coincidence that Planet Fedora has stopped syndicating > the blogs of volunteers in the same week that Red Hat stopped[1] funding > the FSF. ...snip... The cron job that updates the planet was stuck. I have

Planet -> WeMakeFedora.org RMS: what are people saying?

It is a strange coincidence that Planet Fedora has stopped syndicating the blogs of volunteers in the same week that Red Hat stopped[1] funding the FSF. I promised I would consider the Fedora Code of Conduct[2] and with that in mind, I will not speculate that this is any more than a coincidence.

Re: Fedora Account Migration & Production Deployment Update: COMPLETE!

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:02:58PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I'd like us to add security query/respond pairs. > > Those can very easily weaken security, as the answers are often public > and easy for an attacker to look up, especially when there are only a > few

Re: Libavif SONAME bump

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:11 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On 3/29/21 10:56 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Can you do it now instead of waiting until next week? Next week starts > > the F34 Final Freeze which means the soname bump is going to linger in > > updates-testing for weeks until the

Re: Libavif SONAME bump

On 3/29/21 10:56 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:48 PM Robert-André Mauchin > wrote: Hi, Following the yanking due to an unannounced SONAME bump by my comaintainer, I intend to bump libavif soname next week to 10. The affected

Re: Libavif SONAME bump

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:48 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hi, > > Following the yanking due to an unannounced SONAME bump by my > comaintainer, I intend to bump libavif soname next week to 10. > > The affected packages are the following: > > PACKAGEDEPENDENT

Libavif SONAME bump

Hi, Following the yanking due to an unannounced SONAME bump by my comaintainer, I intend to bump libavif soname next week to 10. The affected packages are the following: PACKAGEDEPENDENT DEPENDENCIES libavif-0.8.4-5.fc35.x86_64

[389-devel] please review: PR 4707 - fix shebang mangling warnings

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4707 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

selinux-policy package versioning change

Hi, We plan to change the versioning scheme of the selinux-policy packages. Based on a request to using tags in selinux-policy github repo, we discussed further actions and possible automation and decided to couple the tags with the package version, together with making a change for better

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 29/03/2021 11:49, Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:13:08 +0100 > Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> >> >> On 22/02/2021 22:43, Dan Horák wrote: >>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 21:19:26 - >>> "Tom Seewald" wrote: >>> > On 22/02/2021 21:18, Tom Seewald wrote: > > > >

Fedora-34-20210329.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 9/189 (x86_64), 12/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210328.n.0): ID: 834684 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/834684 ID: 834709 Test:

Re: RFC: declaring estimated per-builder RAM usage in spec file

Hi again, On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 17:29 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > [snip] > Right now I'm just overriding _smp_build_ncpus to 1, but there is a > more elegant solution I'd like to propose: > > What if one can declaratively set the required RAM per build job -- > either with a single

Fedora-Rawhide-20210329.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 10/189 (x86_64), 26/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210328.n.0): ID: 834203 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL:

[389-devel] please review: PR 4705 - UI - migrate tables to PF4 (part 1 - monitor tables)

https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4705 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Fedora-IoT-34-20210329.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210328.0): ID: 835538 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/835538 ID: 835544 Test: aarch64

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Hi, On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 11:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > devrim: python-flask-mail, python-flask-babelex, python-flask- > paranoid, > python-flask-sphinx-themes, python-flask-gravatar, python-flask- > security I was planning to maintain them for pgAdmin4, but then upstream changed all of

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: json license change

On 29.03.2021 16:58, Stephen Gallagher wrote: For clarity, this is a license change to the package `json`[1], not to JSON as a format. Yes, json package ofc. Thanks for clarifying this. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___

Re: json license change

For clarity, this is a license change to the package `json`[1], not to JSON as a format. [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8171 On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:23 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > Hello all. > > License changed from "MIT" to "MIT and CC0". > > -- >

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 34 RC 20210329.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 34 RC 20210329.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see:

json license change

Hello all. License changed from "MIT" to "MIT and CC0". -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210329.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210328.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210329.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 74 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 224.36 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210329.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210328.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210329.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 66 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.14 GiB Size of dropped packages:4.62

[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Branched 20210329.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 34 Branched 20210329.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

- Original Message - > From: "Alexander Bokovoy" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 10:06:28 PM > Subject: Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35 > > On pe, 26 maalis 2021, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > >Hi all. > >

Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35

- Original Message - > From: "Miro Hrončok" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 6:51:56 PM > Subject: Re: Proposal to fail builds if RPATH is found in Fedora 35 > > On 26. 03. 21 18:24, Charalampos Stratakis wrote: > > python2.7churchyard

Re: Multiple snapshots and versioning

On 29/03/2021 11:32, Fabio Valentini wrote: There are two examples of how to work around this issue: - The ruby package bundles a bunch of gems in addition to the Ruby interpreter, and while some of the gem subpackages have different versions, there's only *one* Release tag in the whole

Re: Multiple snapshots and versioning

On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 6:17 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > > I'm looking to package some GTK themes. Those themes come in several colour > variants. The author decided on a workflow where, instead of keeping variants > alongside each other in the tree, each variant has its own git branch. > >

(Empty) Schedule for Tuesdays's FESCo Meeting (2021-03-30)

We would hold the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net, but there is nothing on the agenda, so I'm cancelling the meeting. = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = #2589 Disallow "Block Un-Signed commits" hook in dist-git https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2589

Re: Fedora 35 Change proposal: POWER 4k page size (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:13:08 +0100 Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 22/02/2021 22:43, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 21:19:26 - > > "Tom Seewald" wrote: > > > >>> On 22/02/2021 21:18, Tom Seewald wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Personally, I have an older GPU, RX 580 Polaris

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1400 UTC on Monday, 29th March (Today)

Hello everyone, (Please note that change in time for today: 1400 UTC instead of 1300 UTC) Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 29 March (today!) at 1400UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210329.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210328.0): ID: 833971 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: RFC: declaring estimated per-builder RAM usage in spec file

Dne 27. 03. 21 v 1:29 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a): Is there interest in having this be available? I could imagine it might be useful for other resource-intensive package builds e.g. for Chromium. Definitely. Additionally see https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issue/1678 for declaring timeout.

Re: Multiple snapshots and versioning

> How are version numbers handed upstream? Upstream did choose a version, but the releases are rather infrequent, so I'd prefer to use snapshots. > Would a simple date work for you? > > Source1: url-of-branch-1-source > Source2: url-of-branch-2-source > ... > > Version: 0 > Release:

[Bug 1939439] perl-MouseX-App-Cmd-0.30-20.fc35 FTBFS: Failed test 'Internal hashes match' at t/build_emulates_new.t line 18.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939439 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210329.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210328.0): ID: 833853 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833853 Soft failed openQA tests: