It looks like matio have been updated in Fedora 33
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0933889858
From matio 1.5.17 with soname 9
To matio 1.5.21 with soname 11
This doesn't seems acceptable, or, at least, should be managed
Used by:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890595
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890795
Bug 1890795 depends on bug 1890595, which changed state.
Bug 1890595 Summary: EPEL8 Request: perl-OpenGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890595
What|Removed |Added
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-7f980da66e
tor-0.3.5.14-1.el7
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-615589a3ad
zarafa-7.1.14-4.el7
7
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-eb1a7d918d
atasm-1.09-1.el8
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9222415f70
exim-4.94-2.el8
3
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/178 (x86_64), 6/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210330.n.0):
ID: 839705 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/839705
ID: 839766 Test: aarch64 universal
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:18 PM Lars Seipel wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:36:48PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >Unless OpenShift and RKE recently changed so that containers can run
> >as root by default (as of yesterday, they didn't), this is solidly a
> >bad idea, since it makes it much
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:36:48PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
Unless OpenShift and RKE recently changed so that containers can run
as root by default (as of yesterday, they didn't), this is solidly a
bad idea, since it makes it much more unintuitive to set up secure
containers conforming with the
Ops!
Thank you Fabio.
On 02/04/21 21:00, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
Hi all.
The activities in my Fedora Package Sources page are no longer
highlighted. Do you know why?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/sagitter
It looks like the
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> The activities in my Fedora Package Sources page are no longer
> highlighted. Do you know why?
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/sagitter
It looks like the email address associated with your commits changed,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939439
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 125355
Fixed In
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:34 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 03:52:41PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > * Libraries no longer need executable permission for dependency
> > generation and is automatically removed for non-executable libraries
>
> That's interesting - something
Hi all.
The activities in my Fedora Package Sources page are no longer
highlighted. Do you know why?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/sagitter
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/
Reviewed what?? I don’t know who you are .
Jeff Gentry
jgen...@bamawise.com
205-365-7762
> On Apr 2, 2021, at 6:38 AM, Pierre Rogier wrote:
>
>
> FYI: William already reviewed it but would like a second opinion.
>
> https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4709
> --
> --
>
> 389
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> It happens locally, rather than formally in koji or mock. I've had to
> use it to build things like "cli53", which has a stunning mess of
> golang dependencies hosted in github and beyond my ability to sort out
> the dependency chains. I've also used it for pip based
FYI: William already reviewed it but would like a second opinion.
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4709
--
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:33:48AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > >* Strict checking for
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 04. 21 10:47, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >Dne 01. 04. 21 v 0:54 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> >>Hello:
> >>
> >>Miro Hrončok wrote on 2021/04/01 6:45:
> >>>On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
> * Strict checking for
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 03:52:41PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> * Libraries no longer need executable permission for dependency
> generation and is automatically removed for non-executable libraries
That's interesting - something which affected OCaml packaging:
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4715
FYI a 1 liner fix.
--
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:06 PM Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> On 2/5/21 1:05 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 05/02/21 10:08 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> >> I see that the master to main conversion has happened. I'd like to know
> >> the recommended way to deal with that.
> >>
> >> Currently,
... snip ...
>
> The only one of these I have a major problem with removing is
> shadow-utils. Without those tools, it's impossible to create and
> modify users, and that's an extremely common pattern for containers. I
> also don't think freeing 4MB on the unpacked rootfs is much of a gain
> for
On to, 01 huhti 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 01:50:40PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
This split of fields in FreeIPA Web UI exists since FreeIPA 4.0 which
was part of early RHEL 7 deliveries (the code for separate OTP field was
added in 2014).
There is nothing specific
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/04/02/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210402gitba598c798.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
24 matches
Mail list logo
