Fedora-Cloud-33-20210409.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210408.0): ID: 850104 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Self Introduction: Patrik Polakovic

Hello Fedora community, I am a new Community Platform Engineering intern at Red Hat. I just finished packaging my first package, and am in need of a review (and a sponsor). Bugzilla review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947670 With many thanks and with wishes of a wonderful r

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210409.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210408.0): ID: 850171 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora-IoT-34-20210409.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210407.0): ID: 850190 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/850190 ID: 850199 Test: x86_64 IoT-dv

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210409.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210408.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210409.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 84 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.71 MiB Size of dropped packages

Did golang really get upgraded to 1.16.2?

Hi folks,  I see some reports in FZUG community that this commit [1], supposed to update golang to 1.16.2 in its changelog, didn't change its tarball or n-v-r to new version. And actually builds to 1.16-2. Is it intended to fo the upgrade or the commit is just a normal rebuild with wrong changelo

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210409.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210408.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210409.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

License field correction: luminance-hdr changed from “GPLv2+” to “GPLv2+ and […]”

After taking over maintenance of the luminance-hdr package, I audited the upstream sources and found that the License field needed to be changed from “GPLv2+” to “GPLv2+ and GPLv2 and GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+ and BSD and MIT and Boost”. New builds will be available soon with this and other improvement

Re: Did golang really get upgraded to 1.16.2?

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 08:49:39PM +0800, yanqiy...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi folks,  > > I see some reports in FZUG community that this commit [1], supposed to > update golang to 1.16.2 in its changelog, didn't change its tarball or > n-v-r to new version. And actually builds to 1.16-2. > > Is it in

Re: Did golang really get upgraded to 1.16.2?

On 09/04/2021 15:36, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 08:49:39PM +0800, yanqiy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, I see some reports in FZUG community that this commit [1], supposed to update golang to 1.16.2 in its changelog, didn't change its tarball or n-v-r to new version. And a

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 11:19:59AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hey, it already is there in most tools, try it. % export DEBUGINFOD_URLS=https://debuginfod.stg.fedoraproject.org/ and shortly all F32+ packages/versions/architectures will be debuggable that way. Really cool. Thanks for making

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 9 2021 at 04:19:31 PM +0200, Lars Seipel wrote: Really cool. Thanks for making it happen. I started testing the staging server yesterday. It seems a little slow -- I worry for anyone debugging anything that links to WebKit, which on the desktop is a lot -- but otherwise it works

Re: ELN composes on mirrors

Hey folks, wanted to update on the current status here. On the ELN side, we've agreed to reduce the compose frequency to make ELN easier to mirror; this is being tracked in https://github.com/fedora-eln/eln/issues/39 On the infra side, as part of https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/973

Fedora-Rawhide-20210409.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 6 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 20/127 (aarch64), 19/189 (x86_64

License changes in Gnatcoll packages

Starting with Fedora 34, several Gnatcoll subpackages have licenses that include the GCC Runtime Library Exception. The License fields have therefore changed as follows: gnatcoll-core, gnatcoll-iconv, gnatcoll-syslog, gnatcoll-sql, gnatcoll-sqlite and gnatcoll-postgres have changed from GPLv3+ to

Fedora-34-20210409.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 11/189 (x86_64), 2/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210408.n.0): ID: 850589 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test

Fedora 33 and 34 Workstation images not booting in Hyper-V

Hi, I had the chance check Fedora Workstation Images F33 + F34 Beta  on a brandnew Windows Server with Hyper-V latest. Both are not booting, not even grub showing up. There is no error message visible, so I can't supply you any more infos. The only additional info i can offer is the fact, th

Re: Fedora 33 and 34 Workstation images not booting in Hyper-V

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 14:34, Marius Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > I had the chance check Fedora Workstation Images F33 + F34 Beta on a > brandnew Windows Server with Hyper-V latest. > > I am able to boot Fedora 33 and Fedora 34 beta iso's on Hyper-V Manager 10.0.19041.1 but I don't know if you could

Fedora Linux 34 Final blocker status update #4

The Go/No-Go meeting is Thursday! Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. sddm — logout after switch returns the user to console instead of sddm — NEW ACTION: upstream to fix issue OR sddm maintainers to patch out user switching 2. shim — include new bootloader

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

mcatanzaro wrote: > I started testing the staging server yesterday. It seems a little slow > -- I worry for anyone debugging anything that links to WebKit, which > on the desktop is a lot -- but otherwise it works *very* well. I'm > impressed. Very nice. It'd be good to get a sense of what you f

Re: Fedora 33 and 34 Workstation images not booting in Hyper-V

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 14:58, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 14:34, Marius Schwarz > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I had the chance check Fedora Workstation Images F33 + F34 Beta on a >> brandnew Windows Server with Hyper-V latest. >> >> > I am able to boot Fedora 33 and Fedora

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 11:19 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > ngompa13 wrote: > > > Woohoo! I'm excited for this! > > Thanks! > > > I got a chance to use debuginfod to do some debugging of DNF on > > openSUSE last Saturday and the experience was fantastic. > > > > I'm looking forward to this

Re: Fedora 33 and 34 Workstation images not booting in Hyper-V

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 15:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 14:58, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 14:34, Marius Schwarz >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I had the chance check Fedora Workstation Images F33 + F34 Beta on a >>> brandnew Window

RE: Fedora 33 and 34 Workstation images not booting in Hyper-V

Yes, that’s the right setting for secure boot on Linux. Fedora, Ubuntu, and probably more distros use that setting. There is a list of distros that support secure boot here: Supported Linux and FreeBSD virtual machines for Hyper-V on Windows | Microsoft Docs

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

dmalcolm wrote: > [...] > Something that occurred to me about this change is that as well as > sources and DWARF data, some of our debuginfo files contain python > scripts. Because these files are stand-alone .py files rather than elf/dwarf files, debuginfod has no way of serving those. If they

Re: Need feedback on ocaml-atd review request

On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 19:18 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I am currently traveling, with only my phone for accessing email, so > please pardon top posting, HTML, etc. I also have the goal of > bringing Infer to Fedora, so I am happy to make common cause with > you. > > Are you aware of my efforts to

Re: [Ocaml-devel] Re: Need feedback on ocaml-atd review request

On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 16:04 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 19:18 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > I am currently traveling, with only my phone for accessing email, so > > please pardon top posting, HTML, etc. I also have the goal of > > bringing Infer to Fedora, so I am h

Re: Any interest in Google's recently open sourced Lyra in Fedora?

Petr Pisar wrote: > It's not fully open : > > Please note that there is a closed-source kernel used for math > operations that is linked via a shared object called > libsparse_inference.so. We provide the libsparse_inference.so library > to b

Fedora-IoT-34-20210409.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210409.0): ID: 850954 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/850954 ID: 850969 Test: aarch64

Re: Any interest in Google's recently open sourced Lyra in Fedora?

Also, I looked into packaging Bazel for something else. Next to impossible to package for Fedora. \-- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers \ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love \-d. bowie Sent from ProtonMail mobile

Re: F35 Change: Debuginfod By Default (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Fri, Apr 9 2021 at 04:20:16 PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: Back in Fedora 13 with: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EasierPythonDebugging I added python scripts to python-debuginfo and python3-debuginfo so that if you install them, gdb becomes gains type-specific pretty- printers and

Re: Gating feedback from early adopters after almost 2 years: It doesn't seem to work

Hey Miro, Sad to hear that it's been so rough. On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > I was torn whether to share this here or not. I don't want to be the one > who > always complains about things, but at the end I've decided that without > honest > feedback, there cannot