On 6/3/21 3:55 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 15:30 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
I've just been looking through my packager-dashboard page. A
depressingly large chunk of my packages are going to become
unbuildable on Monday when a bunch of orphaned Java packages are
retired. I
I'm curious if there are other ideas out there for how to deal with this:
From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965692:
I recently acquired a cheap wintel toy tablet/laptop (a Kano PC), which
has a
Celeron N4000 processor. I tried running HPL benchmarks on it to
figure out
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a20d7c1ddd
rxvt-unicode-9.26-1.el8
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-bdd3e1ab81
opendmarc-1.4.1-1.el8
11
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6cc996cdc4
opendmarc-1.4.1-1.el7
11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-969456590e
rxvt-unicode-9.21-4.el7
10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967347
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963113
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962958
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957176
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960857
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962952
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963113
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960857
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962958
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957176
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1963116
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962952
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
> Am 03.06.2021 um 15:35 schrieb Dusty Mabe :
>
>
>
> On 6/2/21 5:28 AM, Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> very nicely put. According to Matthew and others cloud wg did virtually not
>> exist for more than a year, no meetings, silence on mailing list beyond
>> bi-weekly announcement of a
On 03. 06. 21 23:30, Jerry James wrote:
- hamcrest2 will be retired, which will break apache-commons-lang3,
Package "hamcrest" was updated to 2.x, so this should be OK.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/EIU7CNABRKL5EFZNCFIWQIK2AHIEKWBB/
--
On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 15:30 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> I've just been looking through my packager-dashboard page. A
> depressingly large chunk of my packages are going to become
> unbuildable on Monday when a bunch of orphaned Java packages are
> retired. I think a lot of us are going to be
> Am 03.06.2021 um 20:00 schrieb Bruno Wolff III :
>
> Given that badges are being handed out, it is clear the survey is not
> anonymous.
>
> People that do surveys love to claim they are anonymous when they aren't, to
> increase the response. When you are collecting detailed information
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:53 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
>
> W dniu 03.06.2021 o 22:35, Ben Cotton pisze:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraCloudHybridBoot
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > With recent changes in public cloud widely accepting the
> > use of UEFI boot, it would be
I knew that a bunch of java stuff was going away, but I am not sure what
the impact of that is going to be. Is there a feature page or similar
that summarizes what the effect we be?
I have one package that produces a java program using ant that I like to be
able to keep building somehow.
I've just been looking through my packager-dashboard page. A
depressingly large chunk of my packages are going to become
unbuildable on Monday when a bunch of orphaned Java packages are
retired. I think a lot of us are going to be affected. In my case,
there are quite a few non-Java packages
W dniu 03.06.2021 o 22:35, Ben Cotton pisze:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraCloudHybridBoot
== Summary ==
With recent changes in public cloud widely accepting the
use of UEFI boot, it would be consistent to add hybrid boot in support of
both unifying the legacy (BIOS) and UEFI
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraCloudHybridBoot
== Summary ==
With recent changes in public cloud widely accepting the
use of UEFI boot, it would be consistent to add hybrid boot in support of
both unifying the legacy (BIOS) and UEFI boot to the Fedora Linux
cloud base images.
==
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraCloudHybridBoot
== Summary ==
With recent changes in public cloud widely accepting the
use of UEFI boot, it would be consistent to add hybrid boot in support of
both unifying the legacy (BIOS) and UEFI boot to the Fedora Linux
cloud base images.
==
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 21:34:22 +0200,
Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 06. 21 20:29, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:00:23PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Given that badges are being handed out, it is clear the survey is
not anonymous.
When the survey is complete, you get a
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:44 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Please submit topics for the agenda in replies to this email.
>
> My topics:
>
> 1. Broken Compose and detection
> 2. Tracking side-tags in Rawhide
>
A topic I want to add: clarifying guidance on conditionals[1]. There
seem to be some
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 3:52 PM Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> I have landed rpmlint 2.0.0 in rawhide, along with Mirek Suchý's toml configs
> (with updates for the licenses.toml). PRs, bug reports, and suggestions
> welcome.
>
Thank you so much, Tom!
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
I have landed rpmlint 2.0.0 in rawhide, along with Mirek Suchý's toml
configs (with updates for the licenses.toml). PRs, bug reports, and
suggestions welcome.
Thanks,
~spot
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 6:55 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 19. 05. 21 v 6:46 Michal Schorm napsal(a):
>
> * RPMLint
On 03. 06. 21 20:29, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:00:23PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Given that badges are being handed out, it is clear the survey is
not anonymous.
When the survey is complete, you get a non-personalized link which will let
you get the badge. It might
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:00:23PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Given that badges are being handed out, it is clear the survey is
> not anonymous.
When the survey is complete, you get a non-personalized link which will let
you get the badge. It might be theoretically possible to correlate this
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 18:14:50 +0200,
Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
Hello, everyone,
Please participate in the Annual Fedora Contributor Survey 2021!
* https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/2021
The survey is anonymous, it has 44 questions and It is targeting
Fedora contributors of all kinds
I wrote the following script a while ago to check on the ELN
composes.[1][2] It's not fancy, and the webpage it outputs isn't fancy,[3]
but it works. It's a good starting point for checking ELN Composes.
I thought I'd share it before the ELN meeting tomorrow so people would have
a chance to
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:42:23PM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> EPEL Packages have a modified version of the non-responsive package
> maintainer.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Stalled_EPEL_Requests
>
> This is for stalled requests, which is a bit different than
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 09:35:24AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Bear with me and try to assume good faith. When this was first brought up
> in the cloud WG meeting recently I did ask of the implications on our
> pending talks to merge with Server. I thought it had been discussed in the
> Server WG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967644
Bug ID: 1967644
Summary: perl-Dancer2-0.301003 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Dancer2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 6/2/21 5:28 AM, Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> very nicely put. According to Matthew and others cloud wg did virtually not
> exist for more than a year, no meetings, silence on mailing list beyond
> bi-weekly announcement of a „standing“ meeting nobody attended to, there was
> discussion to
Please submit topics for the agenda in replies to this email.
My topics:
1. Broken Compose and detection
2. Tracking side-tags in Rawhide
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:01 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2021-06-04 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00
On 6/3/21 1:28 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 6/3/21 12:20 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
You can try with:
rpm --eval '%{_javadir}/pycharm-community'
F34:
$ rpm --eval '%{_javadir}/pycharm-community'
/usr/share/java/pycharm-community
On Rawhide it doesn't exists. Maybe it was extracted
On 6/3/21 12:20 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Common culprit is that this macro is not defined.
Adding BuildRequires: javapackages-filesystem fixed issue for me.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list --
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2021-06-04 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.net
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9920/
___
devel
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2021-06-04 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.net
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9920/
___
devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967347
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-d42c1e5851 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d42c1e5851
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
If the README has the last word here and it does not matter that some
sequences of bits of /usr/bin/cdparanoia are licensed under GPLv2+ and the
rest of it under GPLv2, so be it.
On the other hand,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967544
Bug ID: 1967544
Summary: perl-SDL-2.548-11.fc35 FTBFS with
sdl12-compat-devel-0.0.1~git.20210602.cc5826a-1.fc35
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
On 6/3/21 12:20 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
You can try with:
rpm --eval '%{_javadir}/pycharm-community'
F34:
$ rpm --eval '%{_javadir}/pycharm-community'
/usr/share/java/pycharm-community
On Rawhide it doesn't exists. Maybe it was extracted to a separate
*-macros package?
--
Sincerely,
Dne 03. 06. 21 v 12:03 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a):
Hello all.
RPM build errors:
File must begin with "/": %{_javadir}/pycharm-community
F33 and F34 were built fine.
Common culprit is that this macro is not defined.
It then expand to '%{_javadir}/pycharm-community'. LIteraly.
Hello all.
RPM build errors:
File must begin with "/": %{_javadir}/pycharm-community
F33 and F34 were built fine.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967373
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967347
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Socket` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Socket/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Socket` that you
are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Socket/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967347
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967434
Bug ID: 1967434
Summary: perl-CGI-4.53 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CGI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967068
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/06/03/report-389-ds-base-2.0.5-20210603gitff830604e.fc34.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967068
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
59 matches
Mail list logo
