On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:52 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 08:52:02PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> ...snip...
> >
> > I see that the ansible SRPM in rawhide has already discarded any
> > support for python2, so that cannot be easily backported to RHEL 7
> > with continuin
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 08:52:02PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
...snip...
>
> I see that the ansible SRPM in rawhide has already discarded any
> support for python2, so that cannot be easily backported to RHEL 7
> with continuing use of python2. Our friends doing EPEL support will
> have to ei
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 8:56 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> EPEL already advises people to use Python 3 whenever possible for EL7.
> For EL8, Python 2 is strongly discouraged. And EL9 isn't even going to
> ship Python 2.
Sadly, their migrations to python3 are not complete and will probably
never approac
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 8:53 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:35 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 23. 06. 21 21:23, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello Fedorans and especially Pythonistas.
> > >>
> > >>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:35 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 06. 21 21:23, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Fedorans and especially Pythonistas.
> >>
> >> I'd like to retire python2-setuptools from Fedora 35+.
> >>
> >> It contains
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 2:36 PM Jerry James wrote:
> As far as I can tell, no Fedora package uses the gnomeui bindings in
> ocaml-lablgtk, so I'll arrange to drop the libgnomeui dependency in
> the next build of ocaml-lablgtk.
COPR builds of affected packages are here:
https://copr.fedorainfracl
On 23. 06. 21 21:23, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello Fedorans and especially Pythonistas.
I'd like to retire python2-setuptools from Fedora 35+.
It contains utilities to execute code downloaded from the internet and it has
not been updated f
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello Fedorans and especially Pythonistas.
>
> I'd like to retire python2-setuptools from Fedora 35+.
>
> It contains utilities to execute code downloaded from the internet and it has
> not been updated for 2 years. It has a potential of a se
This is your reminder that the deadline for submitting F35 Changes
that require infrastructure changes is today. System-Wide Changes and
Changes requiring mass rebuild must be submitted by Tuesday.
The F35 Change proposal deadlines are coming up:
* 2021-06-23 — Change submission deadline (Changes
On 23/06/2021 19:34, Joan Moreau via devel wrote:
Hello
How can I move forward on this ?
Thank you
Hi Joan,
Could you elaborate please?
As Emmanuel said, you have two options:
a) use a COPR repository and publish instructions on enabling the repo
b) find an existing maintainer to do the hea
Hello Fedorans and especially Pythonistas.
I'd like to retire python2-setuptools from Fedora 35+.
It contains utilities to execute code downloaded from the internet and it has
not been updated for 2 years. It has a potential of a security hole, although I
am not currently aware of any.
Unfo
Hello
How can I move forward on this ?
Thank you
On April 27, 2021 21:51:53 Joan Moreau via devel
wrote:
Hi Emmanuel
I am trying my best to foloow the process but I get nowhere
Now I get a "koji" error ("AuthError: unable to obtain a session")
I tried "fedpkg request-repo --exception doveco
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210616.0):
ID: 914976 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/914976
ID: 914980 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_os
On 6/22/21 7:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 13:22, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 6/22/21 7:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 at 12:30, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Hello!
I have an ordinery package, which builds as is for epel7,and all fedoras, but
not for
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 10:35 AM Karolina Surma wrote:
> jjames libgpuarray python-BTrees python-persistent python-texext
I have fixed libgpuarray and python-texext in Rawhide. The other two
are actually due to a Sphinx 4 incompatibility in
python-repoze-sphinx-autointerface, which is now fi
On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 15:44 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hm, the package should probably also be renamed to coffeescript,
> because
> upstream renamed AFAIK
>
yes I think so , I forgot to mention it earlier , sorry.
>
> Vít
>
>
> Dne 23. 06. 21 v 15:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Thank you fo
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 7/199 (x86_64), 9/134 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
Hm, the package should probably also be renamed to coffeescript, because
upstream renamed AFAIK
Vít
Dne 23. 06. 21 v 15:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Thank you for looking into it. So far, I have pushed just the fixed
version:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f7598c56fc
bec
Thank you for looking into it. So far, I have pushed just the fixed version:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f7598c56fc
because there is more things which depends on coffee-script:
$ sudo dnf repoquery -q --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide
--whatrequires coffee-script
v
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210621.0):
ID: 914905 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/914905
ID: 914909 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_os
Hi Zdenek,
See:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JQTTSNHMSFV63KIDDPW4M7WV7CI6KZYW/
TL;DR: workaround is to manually install glibc-gconv-extra, but you
shouldn't need to do anything really because this should already be
fixed by having glibc
Hi all,
vim started to fail to build today with error during compiling desktop file:
msgfmt --desktop -d . --template gvim.desktop.in -o tmp_gvim.desktop
cs.po: warning: Charset "ISO-8859-2" is not supported. msgfmt relies on
iconv(),
and iconv() does not support "ISO-8859-2".
On 23. 06. 21 13:39, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
Package: procyon-0.5.36-0.6.20210619.git92ba3f4.fc35
Old package: procyon-1.0~SNAPSHOT-1.fc35
Summary: procyon java decompiler and other tools
RPMs: procyon procyon-compilertools procyon-core proc
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210622.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210623.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 168
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 100.05 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Dne 22. 06. 21 v 18:34 Karolina Surma napsal(a):
copr-keygen clime dturecek frostyx msuchy praiskup
This is caused by python3-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain
I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975260
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- d
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 01:03 +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden kirjoitti 21.6.2021 klo 14.50:
> > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:02:12PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > > I am a bit confused about this discussion. My fedpkg does not care
> > > about the 'sources' file or the
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210622.0):
ID: 914523 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 01:03:54AM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden kirjoitti 21.6.2021 klo 14.50:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:02:12PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
I am a bit confused about this discussion. My fedpkg does not care
about the 'sources' file or the lookasid
On 2021-06-22 at 18:34 CEST, Karolina Surma wrote...
Hello,
Hello,
kea landgraf thozza zdohnal
Should be fixed with 1.9.8 release I've pushed to rawhide today.
--
Pavel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:25 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/22/21 7:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Welcome to RHEL-8 modularity and the joy it brings anyone trying to
> > port software to 8. The problem is not with EPEL but with the way
>
> hmm. Thanx a lot of for a bt of light in dar
On 6/22/21 4:53 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 5:49 PM Charalampos Stratakis
mailto:cstra...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 5:46 PM Michael Catanzaro
mailto:mcatanz...@gnome.org>> wrote:
Hi, the script is failing the glib2 build due t
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210622.0):
ID: 914447 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
32 matches
Mail list logo
