Hi Ron,
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 04:15:05PM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m curious as to why submitting a new build to Bodhi takes a week to be
> pushed to stable, but two weeks for EPEL-8. Is the presumption that it’s just
> that much more time for folks to test and verify?
>
IIRC
Hey all-
I’m curious as to why submitting a new build to Bodhi takes a week to be pushed
to stable, but two weeks for EPEL-8. Is the presumption that it’s just that
much more time for folks to test and verify?
Ron
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
Robert-André Mauchin writes:
*snip*
> What is the situation wrt new packages? Should we enforce the use of
> rpmautospec during reviews or is it completely optional?
I think we should encourage the usage of rpmautospec for new packages,
provided that the packager feels comfortable enough to us
17. heinäkuuta 2021 10.23.34 GMT+03:00 Christopher Engelhard
kirjoitti:
>On 17.07.21 00:59, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 16. 07. 21 19:58, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>>> On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi everybody,
we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed int
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 9:19 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we should
> > move
> > on and do it... it would simplify a development (the yum/dnf hacks,
> > legacy syste
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210715.0):
ID: 930100 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/930100
ID: 930107 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_os
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 3/199 (x86_64), 8/138 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
Hello.
We found a strange issue with non-US keymaps. If the kbd-legacy package
is not installed (not installed on F34 by default[1]), the system will
hang on boot due to the "Failed to start Setup Virtual Console"[2] error.
Steps to reproduce on clean install:
1. Download Fedora Live ISO (te
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 17:59, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> We touched this topic several times before in our team. Perhaps we should
> move
> on and do it... it would simplify a development (the yum/dnf hacks,
> legacy systemd-nspawn hacks, podman requirement for building Fedora, etc.).
>
> I creat
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210715.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210717.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 192
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 6.58 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Otto Urpelainen writes:
*snip*
>
> I wonder if Updates Policy should have general wording that would allow
> you to update this package without asking for exceptions, or at least
> "make it more likely to grant a request"? It does not make much sense to
> disallow client program updates becau
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Rawhide 20210717.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210716.0):
ID: 929601 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210716.0):
ID: 929585 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 17.07.21 00:59, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 16. 07. 21 19:58, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>> On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production
>>> for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on.
>>>
>>> This means installing
15 matches
Mail list logo
