On 7/22/21 12:13 PM, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> They haven't finished building, so if we cancel both of these, then it
> would work:
>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72392389
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72392356
>>
>
>
> I have canceled both tasks.
P
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 5/199 (x86_64), 11/138 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202
They haven't finished building, so if we cancel both of these, then it
would work:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72392389
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72392356
>
I have canceled both tasks.
--
Tomas Hrcka
role: CPE Team - Senior Software Enginee
On 7/20/21 12:02 PM, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Per the Fedora 35 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 35
> on Jul 21st, 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 35 for the
> changes listed in:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
F35 rebase to libffi 3.4
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210721.0):
ID: 933618 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/933618
Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210721.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210722.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 115
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 230.44 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 7:21 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:56 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:04 AM Fabio Valentini
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:06 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 7/17/21 11:15 PM, Ron Olson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 7:00 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Otto Urpelainen writes:
>
> I am however unsure what the exact rules are, because I also pushed an
> upgrade of Emacs from 26 to 27 to Fedora 33 and received a few
> complaints there (to my surprise).
>
I guess I am too. I haven't looked at th
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:56 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:04 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:06 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7/17/21 11:15 PM, Ron Olson wrote:
> > > > Hey all-
> > > >
> > > > I’m curious as to why submitting a new
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 6:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 22/07/2021 00:02, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > Even if COPR guidelines allow it, Vitaly, it's a bad idea.
>
> Yes, I know. Even Flathub uses pre-built binaries[1].
Aaaggh. While I sympathize with your difficulty as someone con
On 22/07/2021 00:02, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Even if COPR guidelines allow it, Vitaly, it's a bad idea.
Yes, I know. Even Flathub uses pre-built binaries[1].
I'm
startled that the jar files can compile in COPR if they don't compile
in the normal Fedora environment. I suspect they can't, the
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210721.0):
ID: 933249 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 22/07/2021 05:18, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
You can disable osgi requires generator or filter osgi requires (with
eg. __requires_exclude or __requires_exclude_from macros).
Only EPEL7 has an osgi requirement. EPEL8 and Fedora - don't.
Already applied filters:
%global __provides_exclude_from ^
* Marius Schwarz:
> while trying to recompiling fedora 5.12.17 kernel, I got a final error:
>
> scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: Line 214: 273523 Killed
> LLVM_OBJCOPY="${OBJCOPY}" ${PAHOLE} -J ${1}
Check the journal/dmesg. Maybe it's just an out-of-memory error?
Thanks,
Florian
__
On 12. 07. 21 13:30, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I happen to maintain some applications in Fedora where I am strongly confident
our users would prefer "latest and greatest" over 100 % "stability" of the user
interface and/or results.
For some of them, I've been more or less silently breaking
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210721.0):
ID: 933210 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi,
while trying to recompiling fedora 5.12.17 kernel, I got a final error:
scripts/link-vmlinux.sh: Line 214: 273523 Killed
LLVM_OBJCOPY="${OBJCOPY}" ${PAHOLE} -J ${1}
"dwarves" is installed, so this should not happen.
The config file is taken from /boot/ and adjusted via "make menuconfig
17 matches
Mail list logo
