On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 8:21 PM Zebediah Figura wrote:
>
> On 9/6/21 6:31 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:00 PM Zebediah Figura
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks everyone for their input.
> >>
> >> There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use their
> >> MinGW dy
On 9/6/21 6:31 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:00 PM Zebediah Figura wrote:
Thanks everyone for their input.
There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use their
MinGW dynamic libraries. However, this leaves a couple of questions:
* As I described in [1], w
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 7:00 PM Zebediah Figura wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone for their input.
>
> There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use their
> MinGW dynamic libraries. However, this leaves a couple of questions:
>
> * As I described in [1], we *may* be able to hack thing
Thanks everyone for their input.
There seems to be a consensus that Fedora would prefer that we use their
MinGW dynamic libraries. However, this leaves a couple of questions:
* As I described in [1], we *may* be able to hack things in the Wine
loader such that we can use unmodified dynamic li
On 06/09/2021 17:13, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Not sure if that is intentional, but if I am not mistaken, boot menu
used to be hidden if there were no issues, but it seems to be always on
ATM. Is this intentional?
Btw, /boot on BTRFS with GRUB menu hiding will cause breakages with an
"sparse file no
On Mon, Sep 6 2021 at 05:13:59 PM +0200, Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Is this intentional?
No, please report a bug. Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 16/205 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210904.n.0):
ID: 970194 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/970194
ID: 970288 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
Not sure if that is intentional, but if I am not mistaken, boot menu
used to be hidden if there were no issues, but it seems to be always on
ATM. Is this intentional?
Vít
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm canceling this week's meeting.
I'll pick this up again next week if we have anything.
= Discussed and Acted in the Ticket =
#2656 Nonresponsive maintainer: Shawn Iwinski / siwinski
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2656
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one t
Hi,
On 05. 09. 21 15:29, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel writes:
On 05/09/2021 14:52, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
if only a great, overwhelming majority of Fedora package maintainers
were able to write policies for their own packages and maintain it
themselves because SELinux docu
OLD: Fedora-35-20210904.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210906.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
The update was unpushed on everything but Rawhide.
Many (but not quite all) of these packages will use gtest-devel only to
build test executables and have no runtime/install-time dependency on
it. In my opinion, those can probably get by without rebuilding if desired.
- Ben Beasley
On 9/6/21
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 07:23 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We seem to have missed an announcement about the soname bump in gtest
> from 1.10.0 to 1.11.0:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtest/c/b290e7d10ed5fd24b4e1e45f46ad4c15848c18a5?branch=rawhide
>
> We ran into this because it
On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 15:57 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 1:32 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > So it appears to be an SELinux issue. I suspect but cannot prove that
> > it's related to a number of AVCs related to DBUS that I see in
> > selinux-troubleshooter.
>
> I'm only
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210905.0):
ID: 970096 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 02:08 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 2:00 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > clearly SELinux as a technology is a problem.
> >
>
> I mean, of course, that it's *not* a problem. Though I guess you
> could read the statement as sarcasm?
I was about to ask you w
> Am 05.09.2021 um 17:59 schrieb Matthew Miller :
>
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 09:19:20AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
>> I think it is urgent that Fedora Council starts an initiative here (and I
>> would not hesitate to contribute, not just ask others to do something).
>
> To be clear, the request i
Hi,
On 9/6/21 7:57 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 04:43:01PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 10:47 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> systemd-udev-settle.service is deprecated. Please fix
>>> multipathd.service not to pull it in.
>>> https://bugz
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210905.0):
ID: 969961 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
19 matches
Mail list logo
