Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210909.0):
ID: 977879 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/977879
Soft failed openQA
On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 00:02, Geoffrey Marr wrote:
> # F35 Blocker Review meeting
> # Date: 2021-09-13
> # Time: 16:00 UTC
> # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
>
> Hello testers!
>
> There are currently 6 proposed freeze exceptions to be looked at during
> the meeting. We
# F35 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-09-13
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hello testers!
There are currently 6 proposed freeze exceptions to be looked at during the
meeting. We will also spend some time looking over the existing 6 accepted
blockers
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 2:49 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Take this with a grain of salt, I'm certainly not an expert when it
> comes to C++. Though I think I might have found the issue in the
> ncurses header files. Comparing the contents of ncurses-devel between
> f34 (which builds fine) and
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 9:49 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I've been trying to figure out how to fix the builds for
> libyui-ncurses[1] and libyui-mga-ncurses[2].
>
> The errors in both package builds confuse me. It looks like the
> "friend" declarations are all broken and it leads to
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 1:49 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out how to fix the builds for
> libyui-ncurses[1] and libyui-mga-ncurses[2].
>
> The errors in both package builds confuse me. It looks like the
> "friend" declarations are all broken and it leads to all kinds of
>
Hello all,
I've been trying to figure out how to fix the builds for
libyui-ncurses[1] and libyui-mga-ncurses[2].
The errors in both package builds confuse me. It looks like the
"friend" declarations are all broken and it leads to all kinds of
missing methods and members, which breaks the whole
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003382
Bug ID: 2003382
Summary: perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.57 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Scalar-List-Utils
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003382
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/205 (x86_64), 7/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210910.n.0):
ID: 977587 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/977587
ID: 977665 Test: aarch64
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 7:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 12:46:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:51:15PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > > LINUX KERNEL --
> > > Adding to the variety of places where the Linux kernel
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 06:25:34AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> >FWIW, I've been playing with zstd-coompressed initrd images.
> >With a large initd image, it shaves about 1 second from the boot
> >time.
> Please give numeric statistics. How many MB is large,
> and how many seconds does it take?
$
OLD: Fedora-35-20210910.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210911.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA
Hey!
Should it not be 13th September if its on Monday 12th September is tomorrow
Sunday fyi
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 3:26 PM Aniket Pradhan
wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday
> 12th September at 1300 UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC
Hello everyone!
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday
12th September at 1300 UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat). The
meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can
join us over:
IRC:
https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neuro
FWIW, I've been playing with zstd-coompressed initrd images.
With a large initd image, it shaves about 1 second from the boot
time.
Please give numeric statistics. How many MB is large,
and how many seconds does it take?
___
devel mailing list --
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Branched 20210911.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 12:46:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:51:15PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > LINUX KERNEL --
> > Adding to the variety of places where the Linux kernel supports making use
> > of Zstd compression, kernel modules moving forward can
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210910.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210911.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 67
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.40 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
在 2021-09-09星期四的 02:49 +，Bojan Smojver via devel写道：
> Just being devil's advocate for a second here...
>
> Two days to build FF in koji? Has it gotten that big or are the
> builds that slow?
It should not be that slow, if you look at build.log you can see
```
... timed out waiting for
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210910.0):
ID: 977141 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210910.0):
ID: 977125 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
23 matches
Mail list logo
