Why can't I push to a module branch?

(base) [orion@vmrawhide-rufous openmpi (4.0)]$ git push Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 remote: Branch refs/heads/4.0 is unsupported remote: Denied push for ref 'refs/heads/4.0' for user 'orion' remote: All changes have been rejected To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openmp

Re: Package deletion notifications are unparsable

On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 19:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 09:09:39AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:56:45AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > > I see the following in my Fedora Notifications Digest > > > > > > Digest Summary: > > > 1.

Re: Package deletion notifications are unparsable

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 09:09:39AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:56:45AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > I see the following in my Fedora Notifications Digest > > > > Digest Summary: > > 1. qulogic's visidata-2.3-1.fc35 was deleted > > ... > > --

No FESCo Meeting today (2021-09-13)

There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm canceling this week's meeting. I'll pick this up again next week if we have anything. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an em

Fedora-35-20210913.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/141 (aarch64), 9/205 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210912.n.0): ID: 979891 Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979891 ID: 979900 Test: aarch64 Ser

Fedora-Rawhide-20210913.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required test results missing Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud Failed openQA tes

Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG

Hello! I'm new here, but I would like to be part of this group, I have a little knowledge of Java and I think I can be helpful for the group's goals. Note: I know this thread is old, but I didn't know how to join this group, because this group has no sponsors. __

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210913.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-35-20210912.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210913.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210913.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210912.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210913.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 89 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: Claiming ownership for gtg and pyhton-liblarch

oops, I wanted to send the previous message just to the author , message can be ignored  On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:19 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Olá , convido-te para te juntatres ao matrix chat > ( https://app.element.io/#/room/#fedora-br:libera.chat  > > #fedora-br no libera.chat   > > On

Re: Claiming ownership for gtg and pyhton-liblarch

Olá , convido-te para te juntatres ao matrix chat ( https://app.element.io/#/room/#fedora-br:libera.chat  #fedora-br no libera.chat   On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 22:37 -0300, Miguel R. Araújo wrote: > I still need someone to sponsor me into the packager group to be able > to maintain these packages. B

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer check for Jan Pokorny and Rex Dieter

On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:28 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 13. 09. 21 12:16, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > While python 3.10 is not officially released Expected: 3.10.0 final: > > Monday, > > 2021-10-04 ( https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0619/  > >  )  , it

Re: F35 3x slower boot than F34

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:40 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 2:11 AM Marius Schwarz > wrote: > > > > Am 03.09.21 um 18:51 schrieb Chris Murphy: > > > Bug 2001057 - F35 boots 3x slower than F34, large time gaps in systemd > journal > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i

Open NeuroFedora meeting today (13th Sep) at 1300 UTC(Was: Re: [NeuroFedora] Re: 1 of 32,125 Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 12th September)

On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 15:27:34 +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote: > Hey! > > Should it not be 13th September if its on Monday 12th September is tomorrow > Sunday fyi +1, Thanks for that. Just to clarify: the meeting is today at 1300 UTC, and you can join us over IRC/Matrix: IRC: https://webchat.libera

[Test-Announce] GNOME 41 Test Week is underway

Hey folks, We have the GNOME 41 test week happening now and as we ramp towards Beta candidate release, having all the right bugs raised and taken care to will go a long way! If you have some spare time, you can contribute to the ongoing test week[0] and post your results[1] As usual, the Fedora Q

[Test-Announce] [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.14 2021-09-12 through 2021-09-19

Hey All, I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.14 Test week is happening from 2021-09-12 to 2021-09-19. It's fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your results. As usual, th

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer check for Jan Pokorny and Rex Dieter

On 13. 09. 21 12:16, Sérgio Basto wrote: While python 3.10 is not officially released Expected: 3.10.0 final: Monday, 2021-10-04 ( https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0619/  )  , it's rare upstreams to fix their projects. Neither of the two listed bu

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer check for Jan Pokorny and Rex Dieter

On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 11:44 +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > Hello, > > does anybody know how to contact jpokorny and rdieter? They are not > responding to bugzillas regarding the compatibility of their packages > with Python 3.10.  > > Nonresponsive maintainer bug for jpokorny: > https://bugzilla.r

Nonresponsive maintainer check for Jan Pokorny and Rex Dieter

Hello, does anybody know how to contact jpokorny and rdieter? They are not responding to bugzillas regarding the compatibility of their packages with Python 3.10. Nonresponsive maintainer bug for jpokorny: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003596 clufter bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.co

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210913.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210912.0): ID: 979249 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-09-13 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 35 Blocker Review Meeting

V Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 12:18:49AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko napsal(a): > On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 00:02, Geoffrey Marr wrote: > > > # F35 Blocker Review meeting > > # Date: 2021-09-13 > > # Time: 16:00 UTC > > # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat > > > > Hello testers! > > > > There a

Re: Some delay with Rawhide builds getting to the buildroot?

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 09:46:25AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 04:13:32AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 04:10, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > > The build finished last night: > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/k

Re: Some delay with Rawhide builds getting to the buildroot?

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 04:13:32AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 04:10, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > The build finished last night: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1830840 > > > > but is still not available to build against

Re: Some delay with Rawhide builds getting to the buildroot?

On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 04:10, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > The build finished last night: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1830840 > > but is still not available to build against (8+ hours later). Isn't that because the gating tests failed to run? https://bodhi.fedora

Some delay with Rawhide builds getting to the buildroot?

The build finished last night: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1830840 but is still not available to build against (8+ hours later). Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http:/

Re: Package deletion notifications are unparsable

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:56:45AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > I see the following in my Fedora Notifications Digest > > Digest Summary: > 1. qulogic's visidata-2.3-1.fc35 was deleted > ... > --- > > (20

Orphaning rubygems packages

I am these packages, as I have no use for them: - rubygem-cliver - rubygem-ancestry - rubygem-gem-patch - rubygem-scoped_search Regards, Pavel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedo

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210913.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210912.0): ID: 979117 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op