Why should $ORIGIN runpaths appear first?

vtk is generating the following rpaths errors like this: ERROR 0008: file '/usr/lib64/mpich/lib/vtk/libvtkFiltersParallelGeometryJava.so' contains the $ORIGIN runpath specifier at the wrong position in [/usr/lib64/mpich/lib:$ORIGIN:$ORIGIN/../] The notes on the errors state: *0x0008 .

Unsolicited kernel 5.13 RC1 feedback

After reading the Phoronic's article about the AMD improvements baked in the 5.15 kernel I decided to give it a try on my F34 desktop. Bootup was OK but after logging in I saw some small screen corruption on my secondary monitor but Gnome still logged in fine. But after it fully loaded (showing th

Fedora-IoT-34-20210916.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210912.0): ID: 986477 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/986477 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests complet

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 16. 09. 21 23:26, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 16. 09. 21 22:03, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstream

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:24 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 16. 09. 21 22:03, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >>> For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstreamer > >>> support for it

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 16. 09. 21 22:03, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstreamer support for it are installed as weak dependencies with post-GA package updates. Why exactl

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstreamer > > support for it are installed as weak dependencies with post-GA package > > updates. > > Why exactly is this a problem? > Be

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstreamer support for it are installed as weak dependencies with post-GA package updates. Why exactly is this a problem? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:22 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 3:18 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect > > > > > > == Summary == > > exclude_from_weak_autodetect enables autodetection of unmet weak > > dependencies (Recomme

Re: Self Introduction: Eric Curtin

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 3:04 PM Eric Curtin wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > As per: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/ > > here is my introduction. I am the upstream maintainer of inotify-tools > and recent hire at Red Hat. I would like to join th

Re: F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 3:18 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect > > > == Summary == > exclude_from_weak_autodetect enables autodetection of unmet weak > dependencies (Recommends or Supplements) of installed packages and > blocks installation o

F36 Change: Enable exclude_from_weak_autodetect by default in LIBDNF (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect == Summary == exclude_from_weak_autodetect enables autodetection of unmet weak dependencies (Recommends or Supplements) of installed packages and blocks installation of packages satisfying already unmet dependencies. In other words:

Self Introduction: Bruno Larsen

Hello! I have been recently hired to help maintaining the GDB package. I have a bit of experience with open source development, having contributed for a few month to the QEMU project. I am very excited to help in the near future! -- Cheers! Bruno Larsen

Self Introduction: Eric Curtin

Hi Guys, As per: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/ here is my introduction. I am the upstream maintainer of inotify-tools and recent hire at Red Hat. I would like to join the Fedora Package Maintainers. Is mise le meas/Regards, Eric Curti

Re: Where has the kernel-doc package gone?

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 4:04 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:31 AM Nils K wrote: > > > > I found the origin of this change to be the following commit: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/c/b65f9ed036fca30c0684bfc6fe72d72a53e9867a?branch=f21 > > (which is a revert

Fedora-35-20210916.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/205 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210915.n.0): ID: 984996 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/984996 ID: 985060 Test: x86_64 Workstation-li

Fedora-IoT-35-20210916.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210915.0): ID: 985689 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/985689 ID: 985695 Test: x86_64 IoT-dv

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-09-16 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2021-09-16 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.libera.chat.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2021-09-16 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2021-09-16 12

Packaging guidelines - clarification required - Users and Groups

Hello, I seek a clarification on the "Users and Groups Guidelines" [1] chapter of the "Fedora Packaging Guidelines" [2] Please note I want such case to be clear to newcomers too. While I am an experienced packager who has a fair idea how to navigate in Fedora documentation, the same issue might be

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-35-20210915.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210916.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: How to get list of retired packages?

On 16. 09. 21 14:36, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Hi. What is the best way to get list of retired packages in F35? I can get list of all retired packages by scanning dist-git. But if I want it for one release of Fedora? And I do not want to do that manually; I rather want to script it. Hello. Do y

Fedora-IoT-36-20210916.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20210915.0): ID: 984971 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/9849

Fedora-Rawhide-20210916.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MI

Self Introduction: Jan Baudisch

Hi, I am a computer science student from Germany and have used Fedora for at least 2 years by now. Using COPR I gained some experience in buidling packages but recently I wanted to try building packages conforming to the guidelines and getting them into Fedora. My interest is mostly in Rust and t

Re: How to get list of retired packages?

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi. > > What is the best way to get list of retired packages in F35? I can get list > of all retired packages by scanning dist-git. But if I want it for one > release of Fedora? And I do not want to do that manually; I rather want t

Re: How to get list of retired packages?

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 8:37 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Hi. > > What is the best way to get list of retired packages in F35? I can get list > of all retired packages by scanning > dist-git. But if I want it for one release of Fedora? And I do not want to do > that manually; I rather want to sc

How to get list of retired packages?

Hi. What is the best way to get list of retired packages in F35? I can get list of all retired packages by scanning dist-git. But if I want it for one release of Fedora? And I do not want to do that manually; I rather want to script it. Miroslav ___

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

g-i-s is still broken in the Workstation iso for Rawhide today btw just fyi, crashing after install in a Virtualbox VM for me On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:20 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:14 PM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:14 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report > wrote: > > = ADDED PACKAGES = > > Package: atkmm2.36-2.36.1-1.fc36 > > Summary: C++ interface for the ATK library > > RPMs:atkmm2.36 atkmm2.36-devel atkmm2.36-doc > > Size

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:09 PM Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > = ADDED PACKAGES = > Package: atkmm2.36-2.36.1-1.fc36 > Summary: C++ interface for the ATK library > RPMs:atkmm2.36 atkmm2.36-devel atkmm2.36-doc > Size:1.35 MiB (...) > Package: glibmm2.68-2.68.1-1.fc36 > Summary: C+

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210916.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210915.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210916.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 118 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 41.59 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: RH Bugzilla extrem slow loading at enter_bug.cgi for Fedora

Am 15.09.21 um 14:38 schrieb Miro Hrončok: On 10. 09. 21 18:50, Marius Schwarz wrote: Hi, since a few days, loading the enter_bug.cgi for "Product=Fedora" on RH BZ takes very long. It's quite possible, that it's happening for any other product too ;) It's over a minute ATM. I have the same

Re: Claiming ownership for gtg and pyhton-liblarch

I have already submited "pyhton-liblarch" for review, I didn't submited "gtg" yet because to be able to run "gtg" and check if everything is ok, I need first to re-add "liblarch", as it is a dependency of "gtg". This is the review request link:

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210916.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210915.0): ID: 984533 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:20:06AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:13:08AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > > > > > > > Hi

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:13:08AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > > > > > Hi Sahana, > > > > > > it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use

Re: [Heads-up] Introduction of OpenSSL 3.0.0 in F36

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Sahana Prasad wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:57 PM Petr Menšík wrote: > > > Hi Sahana, > > > > it would be nice, if changelog entry contained bug id we could use to > > watch the progress. Or any other link to some tracker. bind package has a > > new

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210916.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210915.0): ID: 984525 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/984525 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_6