On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:37 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> gnome-chemistry-utils is ready for openbabel3; it's in my Copr project.
Well done Antonio!
I will give it a try this weekend.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
Hi.
I created small script `remove-retired-packages`. You can try it using:
$ sudo dnf copr enable msuchy/remove-retired-packages
$ remove-retired-packages
This script removes packages retired between Fedora N and Fedora N-1. You can
run it with parameter:
$ remove-retired-packages 30
And
Hi,
I've noticed that the %_host macro is defined as armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnu on
the arm builders. I believe this is coming from the mockhost config
option in kojid.
In /usr/lib/rpm/macros %_host is defined as armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnueabi
which matches the gcc triple used on arm. Is there a pa
On 9/22/21 12:54 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
On 9/21/21 1:21 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 5:36 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
- several other printer applications was implemented by Till
Kamppeter[1][2][3][4] - Till makes it available as Snaps, I'm planning
to package it into Fedora as
On 9/23/21 2:11 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 23. 09. 21 1:40, Josh Stone wrote:
>> On 9/22/21 4:21 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> for many releases, Fedora has the brp-mangle-sehbangs BuildRoot Policy
>>> Script
>>> that does the following:
>>>
>>>1) Gets all executable files in th
On 23. 09. 21 17:28, Adam Williamson wrote:
... (in
fact, we could have a discussion about getting rid of buildroot
overrides, at this point).
Buildroot overrides still have their use cases. E.g. when there is an existing
update stuck at testing (e.g. during a freeze) that is needed to allow b
The Fedora Linux 35 Beta RC2 compose[1] is GO and will be shipped live
on Tuesday, 28 September 2021.
For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes[2] or log[3].
Thank you to everyone who has and still is working on this release!
The Final Freeze begins on
Tuesday 5 October.
[1]
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210922.0):
ID: 999225 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/999225
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests complet
On 23/09/21 16:30, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Mattia Verga via devel wrote on 2021/09/23 15:11:
>> I've created f35-build-side-46123 and tagged fpc-3.2.2-3.fc35 into that.
>>
>> Lazarus rebuild is in progress. I will take care of rebuilding the other
>> packages listed in bug 1987485 as soon as I can.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/204 (x86_64), 5/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210922.n.0):
ID: 998728 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/998728
ID: 998883 Te
On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 11:29 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#updating_inter_dependent_packages
>
> Says:
>
> """
> You may need a buildroot override to complete a multi-package update
> successfully. For instance in the c
On Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:34:17 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > From all the scan that we've done on fullish installs in the past,
> > there's
> > only 2 others that you might run across: application/x-elc (lisp) and
> > application/x-java-applet.
> >
> > Maybe you just build in logic to w
Mattia Verga via devel wrote on 2021/09/23 15:11:
I've created f35-build-side-46123 and tagged fpc-3.2.2-3.fc35 into that.
Lazarus rebuild is in progress. I will take care of rebuilding the other
packages listed in bug 1987485 as soon as I can. If the maintainers of
those packages want to rebuil
OLD: Fedora-35-20210922.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:742.91 KiB
Size of
gnome-chemistry-utils is ready for openbabel3; it's in my Copr project.
On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
gnome-chemistry-utils
debian says only a small modification is needed:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946263#20
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA tes
tor 2021-09-23 klockan 11:29 +0200 skrev Miro Hrončok:
>
> However, I think side-tags should be the preferred solution, as their
> impact is
> isolated. Buildroot overrides create temporary broken dependencies
> for
> everybody, while side-tags don't.
For stable releases I think I agree, even w
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2021-09-24 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9920/
___
devel mailin
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:11 PM Michael Catanzaro
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 20 2021 at 02:43:20 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini
> > > wrote:
> > > > As usual, I'm askin
* Dominik Mierzejewski:
> On Thursday, 23 September 2021 at 09:52, Filip Janus wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I am wondering about the right name for Autoconf compact package. I need to
>> add the latest release of autoconf into EPEL so I need a package with a
>> different name. Currently, there are in fedo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210922.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210923.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:21
Upgraded packages: 119
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 102.22 KiB
Size of dropped packages
V Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:04:36PM +0200, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 23. 09. 21 11:48, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> > Sounds good. I took a look at the "multi builds" page - it describes the
> > process neatly, but I think there's one thing that could be added there:
> > what if you already buil
On 23. 09. 21 12:51, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Thursday, 23 September 2021 at 09:52, Filip Janus wrote:
Hi all,
I am wondering about the right name for Autoconf compact package. I need to
add the latest release of autoconf into EPEL so I need a package with a
different name. Curre
On Thursday, 23 September 2021 at 09:52, Filip Janus wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am wondering about the right name for Autoconf compact package. I need to
> add the latest release of autoconf into EPEL so I need a package with a
> different name. Currently, there are in fedora autoconf, autoconf213, and
>
On 23. 09. 21 11:48, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
Sounds good. I took a look at the "multi builds" page - it describes the
process neatly,
but I think there's one thing that could be added there: what if you already
built a package
in the main tag (but it didn't go through bodhi and get to stab
Sounds good. I took a look at the "multi builds" page - it describes the
process neatly,
but I think there's one thing that could be added there: what if you already
built a package
in the main tag (but it didn't go through bodhi and get to stable)? Will it be
included in the
newly-created side
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210922.0):
ID: 997946 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:13:37AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 23. 09. 21 9:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >After years of experience I wouldn't use "file" for anything I needed
> >to work reliably.
> >
> >If the test is really ELF or not ELF, how about detecting the ELF
> >header magic direct
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#updating_inter_dependent_packages
Says:
"""
You may need a buildroot override to complete a multi-package update
successfully. For instance in the case described above, you may need to rebuild
bar against the new li
On 23. 09. 21 9:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
After years of experience I wouldn't use "file" for anything I needed
to work reliably.
If the test is really ELF or not ELF, how about detecting the ELF
header magic directly?
As I say in the rest of the email, I know how to detected elves. I just
On 23. 09. 21 1:40, Josh Stone wrote:
On 9/22/21 4:21 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
for many releases, Fedora has the brp-mangle-sehbangs BuildRoot Policy Script
that does the following:
1) Gets all executable files in the buildroot
2) Gets all "text" files from those
3a) Mangles she
Am 22.09.21 um 18:45 schrieb Julian Sikorski:
W dniu 22.09.2021 o 18:42, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 22.09.2021 o 18:34, Julian Sikorski pisze:
W dniu 21.09.2021 o 23:12, Richard W.M. Jones pisze:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 10:16:17PM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 21.09.2021 o 11:00,
> I've created f35-build-side-46123 and tagged fpc-3.2.2-3.fc35 into that.
> Lazarus rebuild is in progress.
Thanks. Lazarus has been built successfully.
> If the maintainers of those packages want to rebuild their package
> (in the side-tag), please do so, it will speed up the process.
I'll go ov
Hi all,
I am wondering about the right name for Autoconf compact package. I need to
add the latest release of autoconf into EPEL so I need a package with a
different name. Currently, there are in fedora autoconf, autoconf213, and
autoconf268. The latest version is 2.71 so I have few options in my m
After years of experience I wouldn't use "file" for anything I needed
to work reliably.
If the test is really ELF or not ELF, how about detecting the ELF
header magic directly?
$ if [[ $(dd if="/bin/ls" status=none bs=4 count=1) == $'\x7fELF' ]]; then echo
elf ; else echo not-elf; fi
elf
$ if [
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210922.0):
ID: 997930 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
V Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:47:07PM -0400, Steve Grubb napsal(a):
> I find the file utility to be almost reliable. It changes how it identifies
> ELF
> files every couple releases. So, to stabilize this, fapolicyd-cli uses it's
> own logic to determine what kind of ELF file it finds. I also regula
37 matches
Mail list logo
