shlomif opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-Mini` that
you are following:
``
add provides for an executable
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Mini/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482813
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b6bebeea3c has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482813
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6a002ea300 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-GnuPG-Interface-1.02-1 |perl-GnuPG-Interface-1.02-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-GnuPG-Interface-1.02-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482813
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
# F35 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-10-04
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 5 proposed Final blockers and 4 proposed Final freeze
exceptions to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday.
If you have time this weekend, you can
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have much for the agenda. There will be a blocker review meeting.
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam
On Fri, 2021-10-01 at 17:27 +, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > This change proposal is the first I've heard of it. But since this is
> > being proposed by the author of Pipewire, I kind of assume it's good,
> > and I doubt Workstation WG would see the need to get involved unless
> > concerns are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009895
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Mozilla-CA-20211001-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76581686
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009895
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1828186
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1828186=edit
[patch] Update to 20211001 (#2009895)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009895
Bug ID: 2009895
Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20211001 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mozilla-CA
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 5:39 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 01. 10. 21 22:11, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > I'll have to file all those "please move these packages into CRB" bugz after
> > RHEL9 is out.
>
> I wonder whether we should file those before it is out, if at all possible?
>
Ideally, yes because
On 01. 10. 21 22:11, Troy Dawson wrote:
I'll have to file all those "please move these packages into CRB" bugz after
RHEL9 is out.
I wonder whether we should file those before it is out, if at all possible?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 06:54:32PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 29. 09. 21 v 14:10 Ondrej Pohorelsky napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the latest git release (2.33.0), upstream stopped shipping
> > git-multimail. We are currently shipping it in Fedora with git-2.32.0,
> > but not as a
This was originally "python-gevent and pytest-cov in el9"
But I wanted to talk about and discuss this paragraph from Carl on it's own.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 7:43 PM Carl George wrote:
> On a related note, EPEL 9 Next _is_ being set up to build against the
> CentOS Stream 9 buildroot. This
Missing expected images:
Soas live x86_64
Mate live x86_64
Xfce live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/21 (x86_64)
ID: 1009466 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009466
ID: 1009472 Test: x86_64
F35 Final freeze begins on Tuesday 5 October.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. mesa — gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell
killed by SIGSEGV — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to revert the regression-causing commit
2. abrt — abrt-dbus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009833
Bug ID: 2009833
Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-7.8.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sys-Virt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
> This change proposal is the first I've heard of it. But since this is
> being proposed by the author of Pipewire, I kind of assume it's good,
> and I doubt Workstation WG would see the need to get involved unless
> concerns are raised. Does WirePlumber have some sort of deficiencies
>
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021, Troy Dawson wrote:
Would you mind opening a bugzilla with this information.
The epel package maintainers for gfal2 way, or may not, be monitoring the
epel-devel mailing list.
Ah, thanks Troy!
Here's the new ticket:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009821
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/204 (x86_64), 8/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210930.n.0):
ID: 1008974 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_resize_lvm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1008974
ID: 1008987 Test: x86_64
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:51, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:28:38PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:21, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > >
> > > Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> > >
> > > > The places I have seen it still being used are in
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:42, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>
> >> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> >> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> >> > light weight system which is simple to set up
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 12:28:38PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:21, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> >
> > Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> >
> > > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> > > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:41 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>
> >> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> >> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> >> > light weight system which is simple to set up
Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
>> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
>> > light weight system which is simple to set up [...]
>>
>> For those people who like simple to set up and working
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:14:47AM +1000, Fred 1 wrote:
> I am trying to find what exactly is raising the error/problem
[snip]
> 2021-09-30 14:41:19,617: No protocol specified
> 2021-09-30 14:41:19,624: Unable to init server: Could not connect:
> Connection refused
It comes from the bug
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:21, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>
> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> > light weight system which is simple to set up [...]
>
>
Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> light weight system which is simple to set up [...]
For those people who like simple to set up and working systems but are
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.11
== Summary ==
Update the Python stack in Fedora from Python 3.10 to Python 3.11, the
newest major release of the Python programming language.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Thrnciar|Tomáš Hrnčiar]]
* Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]]
* Email:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Setuptools_58%2B
== Summary ==
Update to a new upstream release of python-setuptools that is not
completely compatible with previous releases. Since version 58+
upstream removed support for 2to3 during builds. This is a breaking
change and projects are
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Setuptools_58%2B
== Summary ==
Update to a new upstream release of python-setuptools that is not
completely compatible with previous releases. Since version 58+
upstream removed support for 2to3 during builds. This is a breaking
change and projects are
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.11
== Summary ==
Update the Python stack in Fedora from Python 3.10 to Python 3.11, the
newest major release of the Python programming language.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Thrnciar|Tomáš Hrnčiar]]
* Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]]
* Email:
Would you mind opening a bugzilla with this information.
The epel package maintainers for gfal2 way, or may not, be monitoring the
epel-devel mailing list.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 8:06 AM Carl Edquist wrote:
> Dear EPEL Devs,
>
> We ran into an issue on el7 attempting to upgrade from gfal2-util
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009792
Bug ID: 2009792
Summary: perl-Math-BigRat-0.2619 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Math-BigRat
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Dear EPEL Devs,
We ran into an issue on el7 attempting to upgrade from gfal2-util to the
python3-gfal2-util replacement.
[TL;DR: it seems python[23]-gfal2-util in el7 & el8 should all have an
"Obsoletes: gfal2-util < 1.6.0", even if without a matching Provides.]
Apparently
Hi all,
A few weeks ago we started shipping 64 bit ARM (aarch64) artifacts
for our Fedora CoreOS streams. The download page [1] has been
updated to show the new artifact downloads and you should be able to
retrieve aarch64 information from all relevant stream and release
metadata.
Please report
OLD: Fedora-35-20210930.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211001.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 14
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009747
Bug ID: 2009747
Summary: perl-bignum-0.61 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-bignum
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 06:14, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently doing some experiments with replacing the - upstream
> mostly unmaintained - pam_unix module (authentication with user passwd)
> with something using less bloated and cleaner code. This topic is
> currently
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210930.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211001.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 141
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1022.52 KiB
Size of dropped packages
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Branched 20211001.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009728
Bug ID: 2009728
Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999826 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Math-BigInt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 29. 09. 21 22:41, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:05 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
What bothers me as well is that this appears to have been communicated trough
internal channels only.
The manager of that team told me that future announcements will be
sent to the
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
There was a hiatus for some time, expect this weekly from now
Hi,
I've asked internally for RHEL developers feedback about this topic and
I'll post a summary of it in this email.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:39 PM Iker Pedrosa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm adding rhel-devel also to the mailing recipients to get RHEL
> developers feedback.
>
> I'd also like to hear
Hi,
On pe, 01 loka 2021, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently doing some experiments with replacing the - upstream
mostly unmaintained - pam_unix module (authentication with user passwd)
with something using less bloated and cleaner code. This topic is
currently also discussed
Hi,
I'm adding rhel-devel also to the mailing recipients to get RHEL developers
feedback.
I'd also like to hear if there's any opinion on replacing pam_unix from
Fedora and RHEL.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:14 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser <
besse...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm
Hello,
I'm currently doing some experiments with replacing the - upstream
mostly unmaintained - pam_unix module (authentication with user passwd)
with something using less bloated and cleaner code. This topic is
currently also discussed with the upstream maintainer of pam_unix.
Replacing parts
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210930.0):
ID: 1008355 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:43 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:03:07PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm going to start packaging LLVM 13.0.0-final for rawhide and f35. The
> > 13.0.0-final release has a different ABI than 13.0.0-rc1, so I will be
> >
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:03:07PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to start packaging LLVM 13.0.0-final for rawhide and f35. The
> 13.0.0-final release has a different ABI than 13.0.0-rc1, so I will be
> rebuilding the following packages as part of the update:
>
> castxml
>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210930.0):
ID: 1008226 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482813
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6a002ea300 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6a002ea300
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482813
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-822b21bc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-822b21bc26
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482813
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b6bebeea3c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b6bebeea3c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
58 matches
Mail list logo
