Hello,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 2:34 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 6:21 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz
> wrote:
> >
> > W dniu 28.12.2021 o 00:30, Kevin Anderson pisze:
> >
> > > There was a iwlwifi issue that would cause firmware resets and cause
> > > performance to significantly
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 12:19:14 +0100,
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 30/12/2021 09:21, Chris Murphy wrote:
CPU is proprietary, the firmware is proprietary. Guess we can't trust
our computers?
RISC-V.
RISC-V isn't the answer. It is an ISA (with varients), not a computer. A
RISC-V bas
On Fri, 2021-12-31 at 12:19 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Yup, my IRC notifications are often delayed by days, as well, making
> them ... very much less useful.
I second this
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 4:32 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 12:00:06PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 29/12/2021 18:47, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > >If /usr really is read-only, then it probably doesn't matter where
> > >the rpmdb is, since packages can't be
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 4:30 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:57AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr
> > * Other developers:
> > ** changes in SElinux policy
>
> Please can you make sure two bugs are filed against lib
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 3:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 30/12/2021 12:58, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > This has not been decided yet, but likely the Fedora kernel will
> > contain the official Fedora keys, and the user will decide to add
> > new keys (including those from COPR).
>
> 1.
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 10:58, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:19:17PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > It seems that there is some kind of bottleneck somewhere, because the
> > delay often gets progressively worse if there are lots of
> > notifications in a short period of tim
Even if it does, it's unlikely to be the culprit,
since in my case, I only use e-mail notifications.
A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:19:17PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> It seems that there is some kind of bottleneck somewhere, because the
> delay often gets progressively worse if there are lots of
> notifications in a short period of time, and then things are only able
> to catch up to recent notif
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
8 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 20/228 (x86_64), 24/159 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed i
Hi all,
While reviewing switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts [0], I noticed the
package places files in /usr/share/locale/mo which isn't owned by
anything. This isn't allowed by the packaging guidelines. Normally such
folders should be owned by filesystem. There are more packages which
place files
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211230.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211231.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 99
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 948.60 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 31/12/2021 12:32, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
However "dnf list" and "dnf download"
seem to work as non-root, so I guess it must fall back to read-only?
Without root and `-C` command-line option it will download all metadata
to your $HOME.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.o
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 9:20 AM Benson Muite wrote:
>
> On 12/30/21 5:33 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Let me sum up what the Copr team did during 2021:
> >
> Awesome work. Looking forward to a great 2022!
Let me second that. Thank you all for working on COPR and related projects.
I use those ser
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 12:00:06PM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 29/12/2021 18:47, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >If /usr really is read-only, then it probably doesn't matter where
> >the rpmdb is, since packages can't be installed (generally).
>
> dnf opens these database files for writin
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:01:57AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RelocateRPMToUsr
> * Other developers:
> ** changes in SElinux policy
Please can you make sure two bugs are filed against libguestfs and
supermin components to track this change (if it happens). W
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:13 PM Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 09:59:08AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> >This is happening to me, too - but it doesn't seem to be limited
> >to koji notifications. It happens with bugzilla notifications as well.
> >
> >There i
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 09:59:08AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
This is happening to me, too - but it doesn't seem to be limited
to koji notifications. It happens with bugzilla notifications as well.
There isn't any pattern to the delays that I can see.
I regularly receive notification di
This is happening to me, too - but it doesn't seem to be limited
to koji notifications. It happens with bugzilla notifications as well.
There isn't any pattern to the delays that I can see.
I regularly receive notification digests during the day,
yet every now and then I receive a digest informing
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211230.0):
ID: 1092891 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hello,
is it a known problem that koji notifications arrive way too late? For
example, I got mame build notifications in the wee hours today (31.12)
wheras the builds completed around noon on the 29th:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1871260
https://koji.fedoraproject.org
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211230.0):
ID: 1092875 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 30/12/2021 12:58, Roberto Sassu wrote:
This has not been decided yet, but likely the Fedora kernel will
contain the official Fedora keys, and the user will decide to add
new keys (including those from COPR).
1. What about self-built RPMs? I always build RPMs in mock and test them
locally be
On 12/30/21 5:33 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Let me sum up what the Copr team did during 2021:
Awesome work. Looking forward to a great 2022!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedor
24 matches
Mail list logo
