Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

That addresses my concern. I'd assumed that it would occur as part of an RPM update, rather than as a triggered out of band event. It makes rebooting mandatory and slightly risky, especially if /usr overflows halfway through, the process, but that becomes far, far less likely with systemd doing it

Re: Unannounced soname bump of libre2

On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 11:56:04PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/01/08 20:05: > > On 08. 01. 22 11:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > The re2 package was updated today in Rawhide and bumped soname from > > > libre2.so.0a to libre2.so.9. > > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.

Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 6:07 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:58 AM Fabio Valentin

Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:07 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:58 AM Fabio Valentin

Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:58 AM Fabio Valentini > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 4:03 PM Ben Cott

Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 7:53 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:58 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > (snip) > > > > > > > > > > > == Detailed Des

Re: Need help with some rpmlint errors

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 6:37 AM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > `E: shared-library-without-dependency-information > /usr/lib64/libapogee.so.3.2` > I'm not sure if this is a rpmlint false positive. All I can found > searching is an issue in rpmlint which says that the library could be > statically l

Re: Self Introduction: Malcolm Inglis (mcinglis)

Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 8.1.2022 klo 1.23: On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 11:43:15PM +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote: I can give a couple of reasons why just using the packager-sponsors tracker always would be better. This is from the point of view of somebody who had to find a sponsor. I am not a sponsor

Re: [Discussion] Future of the CLI APP packaging

Dne 08. 01. 22 v 15:28 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:08 PM Jiri Konecny wrote: (snip) I really can't blame the people. Not everyone has the week of time to package all the dependencies one by one. But COPR is a nice shortcut to that so I can have what the upstream is pr

Re: Heads up: libffi 3.4 rebuild in rawhide today

On 08. 01. 22 10:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: I intent to rebuild the following packages with libffi 3.4 in Rawhide side tag f36-build-side-49314 today. The update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c440651258 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _

Re: Heads up: libffi 3.4 rebuild in rawhide today

On 08. 01. 22 18:09, Carlos O'Donell wrote: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/libffi-3.4/package/cjs/ https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/libffi-3.4/package/gjs/ both "killed by signal 11 SIGSEGV" Right, this is because there is an ordering dependency between gob

Re: Heads up: libffi 3.4 rebuild in rawhide today

On 1/8/22 04:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello packagers, > > I intent to rebuild the following packages with libffi 3.4 in Rawhide side > tag f36-build-side-49314 today. Thank you for helping with the rebuilds! > The previous version remains available as libffi13.1, so failures to build > will

Re: Unannounced soname bump of libre2

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/01/08 20:05: On 08. 01. 22 11:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: The re2 package was updated today in Rawhide and bumped soname from libre2.so.0a to libre2.so.9. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/re2/c/dafa514 Seven packages are broken: dnsdist: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s

Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:58 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > > > (snip) > > > > > > > > == Detailed Description == > > > === Current location === > > > /var/lib/rpm > > > > > > === N

Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 8:58 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > (snip) > > > > > == Detailed Description == > > === Current location === > > /var/lib/rpm > > > > === New location === > > /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm > > > > /var/lib/rpm will be a symli

Re: [Discussion] Future of the CLI APP packaging

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 3:08 PM Jiri Konecny wrote: > (snip) > > I really can't blame the people. Not everyone has the week of time to > package all the dependencies > one by one. But COPR is a nice shortcut to that so I can have what the > upstream is producing > without spending so much time an

Re: [Discussion] Future of the CLI APP packaging

Dne 08. 01. 22 v 1:08 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:48 PM Jiri Konecny wrote: Hi everyone, I would like to do here a bit of brainstorming and ask if there is an existing solution to this problem. To explain my problem, recently I found more and more apps likes terminals

Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 4:03 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > (snip) > > == Detailed Description == > === Current location === > /var/lib/rpm > > === New location === > /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm > > /var/lib/rpm will be a symlink pointing to > /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm I did not find a mention of this in the thr

Need help with some rpmlint errors

In Fedora we provide several different packages for libraries and drivers from INDI [1] we can ship (due to patent issues). As this requires a lot of work, I'm starting to create a single package for all libraries. I've started to do a scratch build on COPR [2] with only the libapogee library, but

Re: Unretire python-trml2pdf

On 08/01/2022 13:09, Евгений Пивнев wrote: What to do? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapr

Unretire python-trml2pdf

Package is 'Review-request'ed and approved: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922783 But pagure reject all requests: ```bash bash-5.1$ LC_ALL=C git push Enumerating objects: 8, done. Counting objects: 100% (8/8), done. Delta compre

Re: unretire luit and vttest

On 07/01/2022 13:58, Thomas Dickey wrote: I did that - see I will review these packages and sponsor you to Fedora. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

Re: Sundials 6.0.0

What about bout++ ? On 12/19/21 20:17, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. Sundials-6.0.0 is available, it's a major release that includes many changes (https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) I compiled the new packages in Copr, rebuilt bout++ and octave which need attent

Re: Unannounced soname bump of libre2

On 08. 01. 22 11:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: The re2 package was updated today in Rawhide and bumped soname from libre2.so.0a to libre2.so.9. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/re2/c/dafa514 Seven packages are broken: dnsdist: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038544 fails to build,

Unannounced soname bump of libre2

The re2 package was updated today in Rawhide and bumped soname from libre2.so.0a to libre2.so.9. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/re2/c/dafa514 Seven packages are broken: bloaty: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038543 dnsdist: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038544

Re: [cfe-dev] Release 13.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

On 1/1/22 12:54, Sean McBride wrote: On 30 Nov 2021, at 1:07, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev wrote: Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. It's been over a month since 13.0.1-rc1, and, as has been the case for many previous releases, there are no macOS binaries. And chance we'll see so

Re: Heads up: libffi 3.4 rebuild in rawhide today

On 08. 01. 22 10:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello packagers, I intent to rebuild the following packages with libffi 3.4 in Rawhide side tag f36-build-side-49314 today. The previous version remains available as libffi13.1, so failures to build will not result in uninstallable packages. You can

Heads up: libffi 3.4 rebuild in rawhide today

Hello packagers, I intent to rebuild the following packages with libffi 3.4 in Rawhide side tag f36-build-side-49314 today. The previous version remains available as libffi13.1, so failures to build will not result in uninstallable packages. You can inspect some known failures: https://cop

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220108.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220107.0): ID: 1098875 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: [ELN] Why is rubygem-liquid included in eln?

Troy Dawson kirjoitti 7.1.2022 klo 16.46: On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 12:20 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote: I am the maintainer of rubygem-liquid package in Fedora. Every now and then is receive notification that this package has been built and updated for eln, for example [1,2]. I have been trying to u

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220108.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220107.0): ID: 1098859 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op