The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cf4fee5aa6
perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1ba918cfc7
strongswan-5.9.5-2.el8
The following
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041280
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7b3a04be87 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6395a45cb3
perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
liblxi-1.15-1.el7
miniupnpc-2.0-3.el7
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 02:18:14PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 09:56 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 04:03:06PM +1000, Bob Hepple wrote:
> > > One of my packages, stable for a long time, is now getting exotic
> > > errors in rawhide such as
> > >
> >
On 1/29/22 19:40, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote on 2022/01/30 3:48:
hdf5 is starting to fail to build with gcc 12 in rawhide with:
make[2]: Entering directory
'/builddir/build/BUILD/hdf5-1.12.1/build/fortran/test'
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=FC --mode=link gfortran -std=f2008
On 1/27/22 10:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 08:30 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 15:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
There are still over a dozen packages in the distro that
require it:
Hi,
the gnome-software also calls pkexec is some occasions,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041074
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(m...@fale.io)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
--- Comment #33 from Sergio Basto ---
source of w3c-markup-validator is https://github.com/w3c/markup-validator/ and
not https://github.com/validator/validator
https://github.com/validator/validator is needed for w3c-markup-validator but
just adding Jakub.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 7:50 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> Bumping this since I have an identical issue with colobot - the compilation
> errors out when a C-like string literal is assigned to an std::string, with
> the compiler providing the same "memcpy accessing...
Thanks for the %global macros.
How common in f36, and in general in fedora is the need for reducing the
optimization levels?
I don't have small examples to reproduce the failures, but both issues have a
Dockerfile that can be used to compile the programs and trigger the failures
(it takes 10
I thought the gcc 12 related issues with ppc64le had been fixed but perhaps
not in all cases?
On the original rebuild[1] two tests failed (segfaulting) but on my latest
attempt with the new gcc 12 build[2] I now have 3 tests segfaulting.
Thanks,
Richard
[1]
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 9:40 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 08:00:48AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-1.6.68/Externals/MathMLSolver/src/MathMLEvaluatorVisitor.cpp:1:
> >
>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:26:58AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> something needing *pkexec*. Though from what we've found in this
> thread, it seems like at least GNOME and KDE definitely do still need
> it. I'm not enough of a domain expert to know if it's realistic to
> rewrite everything in
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 08:00:48AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-1.6.68/Externals/MathMLSolver/src/MathMLEvaluatorVisitor.cpp:1:
> /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-1.6.68/Externals/MathMLSolver/include/MathMLError.h:
> In destructor 'virtual
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048250
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details bellow:
GenericError: File upload failed:
cli-build/1643555916.5665624.ARbgofDY/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.107-1.fc34.src.rpm
Traceback:
File
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048250
Bug ID: 2048250
Summary: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.107 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian
Keywords:
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
If you wish to read this in the form of a blog post, check the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248
Bug ID: 2048248
Summary: mod_perl-2.0.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: mod_perl
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi,
I'am trying to compile Carla [1] on f35, but this fails with this eror message
[2]:
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libgraphite2.so.3, needed by /lib/libharfbuzz.so.0, not
found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
/usr/bin/ld: /lib/libharfbuzz.so.0: undefined reference to `gr_seg_advance_X'
I'm trying to keep openCOLLADA going a little longer so I disabled LTO
which allows the package to build on all arches except armv7hl...
[ 3%] Building CXX object
COLLADABaseUtils/CMakeFiles/OpenCOLLADABaseUtils_shared.dir/src/COLLADABUUtils.cpp.o
cd
On 30/01/2022 12:59, Marcin Dulak wrote:
It seems like the above problems are specific to gfortran-12 on f36.
%global _lto_cflags %{nil}
%global optflags %(echo %{optflags} | sed 's/-O2 /-O1 /')
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
I have two packages where a workaround of reducing the compilation optimization
level avoids runtime failures:
1 Use of -O1 to avoid a numerical test error "zdot wrong"
https://github.com/GlobalArrays/ga/issues/249
2 Use of -fno-lto to avoid segmentation faults
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 12:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 27. 01. 22 4:59, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when working on finally fixing Trojitá to build (it had been FTBFS since
> > F34, so removal was impending), I have noticed that the Akonadi contacts
> > plugin was not
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220129.0):
ID: 1116180 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220129.0):
ID: 1116164 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
26 matches
Mail list logo
