On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 9:04 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Well, it's not any specific timeframe we can promise here.
Of course not. But it is clearly not "soon".
> Take a look at:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/propagation
>
> You can see the two days recently we got rawhide compose
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 04:09:21PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:32 AM Ian McInerney via devel
> wrote:
>
> > From a user experience perspective, the mirror lag time on it is very
> > annoying. When the update is pushed to testing, Bodhi posts a comment in
> > the as
Am 04.02.22 um 23:43 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
We build using mingw precisely to avoid touching Windows at all.
Yup - same here. We are using Fedora's mingw packages to create Windows
executables which link to a proprietary 32 bit library. This really has been a
huge time saver for me and
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:15 PM Roman Inflianskas wrote:
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> I get this this error:
> mockbuild.exception.ConfigError: Could not find included config file:
> /tmp/epel-9-x86_64.j_mo4dzgmockconfig/templates/centos-stream-9.tpl
>
> Copying this templates/centos-stream-9.t
Thanks for your answer.
I get this this error:
mockbuild.exception.ConfigError: Could not find included config file:
/tmp/epel-9-x86_64.j_mo4dzgmockconfig/templates/centos-stream-9.tpl
Copying this templates/centos-stream-9.tpl doesn't help.
I've tried this instead:
sudo ln -s /etc/mock/centos-s
On 05. 02. 22 17:16, Neal Becker wrote:
On my update yesterday on F35, python3.11a4 got pulled in as a 'weak'
dependency. How can I trace where this dep came from?
$ repoquery --releasever=35 --repo={fedora,updates} --whatrecommends python3.11
(empty)
$ repoquery --releasever=35 --repo={fedor
Hello!
We have managed to fix jdk11 and 17 yesterday evening.
It is now building for rawhide.
Oce it get fixed, I had merged the jdk11 no longer being system jdk, and jdk17
becoming system jdk for rawhid.
They are now building for f36-java17 sidetag.
They should finish today, and no later th
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 10:33 AM Roman Inflianskas via devel
wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build python-executing for epel9
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049855) using this command
> (from Fedora 35):
> fedpkg --release epel9 mockbuild
>
> The build fails with these lines:
> Handling
On my update yesterday on F35, python3.11a4 got pulled in as a 'weak'
dependency. How can I trace where this dep came from?
Thanks,
Neal
--
*Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:32 AM Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
> From a user experience perspective, the mirror lag time on it is very
> annoying. When the update is pushed to testing, Bodhi posts a comment in the
> associated Bugzilla saying that you should "soon" be able to install the
> upd
I'm trying to build python-executing for epel9 (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049855) using this command
(from Fedora 35):
fedpkg --release epel9 mockbuild
The build fails with these lines:
Handling asttokens from tox --print-deps-only: py39
Requirement not satisfied: asttokens
Han
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 4:00 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I noticed that dnf update stuck for a while in the "Cleanup" phase of the
> breeze-icon-theme package.
>
> At the time this was taken: it spent 10 minutes with the CPU pegged at 100%,
> and it eventually finished at about the 11 and a half mi
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 25/228 (x86_64), 26/159 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed i
I noticed that dnf update stuck for a while in the "Cleanup" phase of the
breeze-icon-theme package.
At the time this was taken: it spent 10 minutes with the CPU pegged at 100%,
and it eventually finished at about the 11 and a half minute mark, and
completed the rest of the update:
Tasks:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220205.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 05:57:10AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 5:54 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 10:47:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > > Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > > I have honest doubts about projects doing releases for Windo
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 5:54 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 10:47:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > I have honest doubts about projects doing releases for Windows without
> > > ever running it.
> >
> > WINE can be helpful for test
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 10:47:12AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > I have honest doubts about projects doing releases for Windows without
> > ever running it.
>
> WINE can be helpful for testing, or I can just let those Windows users who
> asked for the Windows
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 11:31:49AM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:38:11PM +, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> > >
> > > I guess it was a mirror caching issue. I tried again just now and it
> > picked
> >
Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> I have honest doubts about projects doing releases for Windows without
> ever running it.
WINE can be helpful for testing, or I can just let those Windows users who
asked for the Windows build to begin with test it. ;-)
Kevin Kofler
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220204.0):
ID: 1119473 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 01:27:48PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:44 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 05:20:31PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Projects releasing for Windows should probably natively build and test
> the
"This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi"
Thanks everyone!
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripti
Hi
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 2:44 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 05:20:31PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Projects releasing for Windows should probably natively build and test
> their
> > releases with Msys2, and they can do so for msvcrt targets.
>
> This isn't a ver
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 09:02:17AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 05/02/22 09:49, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto:
> > On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 08:10:53AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >> Il 05/02/22 08:31, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto:
> >>> How do I make this update go to Rawhid
Il 05/02/22 09:49, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 08:10:53AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> Il 05/02/22 08:31, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto:
>>> How do I make this update go to Rawhide? I have already tested the
>>> important packages in the set locally.
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 11:47:21PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 07:31 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8e3a84510b
> >
> > It's really unclear why this Rawhide update isn't just being tagged
> > into Rawhide. Single b
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 08:10:53AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 05/02/22 08:31, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto:
> > How do I make this update go to Rawhide? I have already tested the
> > important packages in the set locally.
> >
> > Rich.
>
> Have you tried the "Waive test results" b
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220204.0):
ID: 1119457 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Il 05/02/22 08:31, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto:
> How do I make this update go to Rawhide? I have already tested the
> important packages in the set locally.
>
> Rich.
Have you tried the "Waive test results" button in the right column?
Mattia
___
d
30 matches
Mail list logo
