On Wed, 2022-02-09 at 07:03 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Just being paranoid here: do we have any policy / automatism for
> disabling "power" users (in packager group or like) which have been
> inactive for long time?
Yes.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy
Mattia Verga via devel writes:
> Just being paranoid here: do we have any policy / automatism for
> disabling "power" users (in packager group or like) which have been
> inactive for long time?
>
> I'm no security expert, but an inactive user account may be hacked
> without noticing and if such a
Just being paranoid here: do we have any policy / automatism for
disabling "power" users (in packager group or like) which have been
inactive for long time?
I'm no security expert, but an inactive user account may be hacked
without noticing and if such account have powers like being in the
package
So, I've updated review-stats container to run on F34 with
python-bugzilla 3.2.0, but it still authenticate using
username+password. Is that enough to avoid authentication errors and
user ban or I need to change the authentication method?
Mattia
___
dev
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:42:25AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> One of my packages ("blueman") had a new release today, so I updated it.
> Despite me committing to the rawhide branch, the build was given the ".f36"
> suffix,
> so when I pushed to the f36 branch and tried to build the pack
One of my packages ("blueman") had a new release today, so I updated it.
Despite me committing to the rawhide branch, the build was given the ".f36"
suffix,
so when I pushed to the f36 branch and tried to build the package,
koji berated me that it's been already built.
So what now? Should I just
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 03:53:51PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:28:53PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Fedora 36 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> > --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
>
> Most of
On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 21:28 +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Bodhi is currently not
> active for Fedora 36, it will be enabled in a couple of weeks when we
> hit Beta change freeze point in the Fedora 36 schedule[1].
We should update this boilerplate (I'm assuming this email is
copy/pasted from release
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:28:53PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 36 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
Most of my packages appear to have f36 branches, but of the two new
packages I just requested
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2022-02-09 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@irc.libera.chat
>
> More information available at:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en
* Denis Fateyev:
> For example, "libscrypt" package issue is filled here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046062
> The library in the package was actually built, but the build results are
> different under
> various GCC versions — as shown in the "nm" dump below.
>
> Has anybody a
Hi All,
Fedora 36 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
--rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
rawhide/f36 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
this means that anything you do for f36 you also have to do in the
rawhide branch and do a buil
On 04. 02. 22 4:03, Jerry James wrote:
Hello all,
...
python-BTrees
python-ZEO
python-ZODB
python-ZODB3
python-fastcache
python-gmpy2
python-j1m.sphinxautozconfig
python-jupymake
python-jupyter-kernel-singular
python-jupyter-polymake
python-manuel
python-pari-jupyter
python-persistent
python-ppl
Hello all,
Recently, I have found that with GCC version bump in F36 some of my
packages are stopped to build, or stopped to build properly during the
planned package rebuild.
They were fine under F35 — but apparently there are some changes in newer
GCC that affected them.
For example, "libscrypt
The following packages, previously owned by xgl-maint, are now up for grabs:
xorg-x11-xfs
xorg-sgml-doctools
xorg-x11-drv-v4l
xorg-x11-xsm
xorg-x11-twm
xorg-x11-drv-sisusb
xorg-x11-xdm
xorg-x11-docs
Upstream development on all of these is pretty much nil, so if you're
serious about picking up any
On 08. 02. 22 14:30, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> Rich dependencies are dynamic and they change from release to release
> (version macros, ...)
That is a different issue, and also happens for non-rich dependencies. I
think we agreed back when the Change was submitted that a depend
On 08. 02. 22 19:50, Petr Menšík wrote:
Is FESCO okay with bundled javascript libraries in similar
packages?
FESCo/FPC does allow bundling. See e.g.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling
This is no different. Except what you describe is a lot of work for the sph
I prefer much more HTML documentation than PDF. While I try to make PDF
also available, HTML is more useful in offline situations, on a train
for example.
On 2/8/22 15:18, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 04:51:35PM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I maintain bind package,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 02:30:30PM +0100, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:56 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> > > I am really sorry but this suggestion is incorrect. Basically we have 3
> > > major misunderstanding
Hello.
Is someone in contact with *srakitnican*?
I started the n*on-responsive maintainer* process [0], because timeshift
doesn't work since Fedora Linux 35 was released. In the meanwhile upstream
released various new versions, and bugs were reported [1].
Someone created a COPR repository with
Hey all,
We have no new business to discuss, so the announced meeting is CANCELLED.
I'll chair next week if we have a meeting.
--
Neal Gompa (FAS: ngompa)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 08. 02. 22 17:31, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > = Followups =
> >
> > #2711 F37 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2711
> >
> > #2721 F37 Change: DIGLIM
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2721
>
> Both were deferred.
On 08. 02. 22 17:31, Neal Gompa wrote:
= Followups =
#2711 F37 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2711
#2721 F37 Change: DIGLIM
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2721
Both were deferred. I don't think there's anything new to discuss. Should we
cancel the meeting instea
Gary Buhrmaster writes:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 2:32 AM Josh Stone wrote:
>>
>> On 11/16/21 7:05 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> > Realistically, they will just stick to Fedora 36 forever and just stop
>> > updating the devices (or try updating them anyway and get no updates from
>> > the
Il 05/02/22 17:32, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> On Sat, 2022-02-05 at 09:28 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> "This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi"
>>
>> Thanks everyone!
> You might wanna just check after the push happens what happened to the
> package you untagged. I don't actua
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2022-02-08 18:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be di
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 5:52 PM Barry wrote:
>
>
> On 7 Feb 2022, at 19:19, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>
>
> Slightly off-topic, but I think it's relevant:
>
> If 'myservice' and 'ods-prx' are referring to the same thing, I think
> you're supposed to use 'systemctl preset' instead of 'systemctl en
Hi Ben,
> It seems that I somehow lost track of the GNU toolchain proposal, so
> it only got submitted to FESCo yesterday. But since it's already
> happened, I went ahead and created the tracking bug for it:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050761
Thanks for filing the bug. Since
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 04:51:35PM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I maintain bind package, which generates html documentation using sphinx
> and sphinx_rtd_theme. I admit this format is quite popular. Once I have
> noticed that bind-doc package is quite big. When looking why, I have
> found n
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:56 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> > I am really sorry but this suggestion is incorrect. Basically we have 3
> > major misunderstandings - what is rich deps and how it is evaluated, what
> > DNF stores in the his
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 13 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 18/228 (x86_64), 11/159 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> I am really sorry but this suggestion is incorrect. Basically we have 3
> major misunderstandings - what is rich deps and how it is evaluated, what
> DNF stores in the history database and how SAT solver in libsolv works.
> Rich deps are very complex things with multiple op
* Jens-Ulrik Petersen [08/02/2022 17:21] :
>
> Anyone interested in keeping 'ikiwiki' and 'perl-Text-Markdown' around?
perl-Text-Markdown has a BR on perl-HTML-Tidy but doesn't do anything
with it. I'll submit a PR to remove it (and improve other things in that
spec file).
Emmanuel
__
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 5:20 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > this is about the following Fedora change:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ExcludeFromWeakAutodetect
> >
> > In the tracking bugzilla, the relevant comment is:
> >
On 08. 02. 22 2:10, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
gstreamer1 orphan, uraeus, wtaymans1 weeks
ago
gstreamer1-plugins-baseorphan, uraeus, wtaymans1 weeks
ago
gstreamer1-plugins-goodorphan, uraeus, wtaymans1
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 12:54:32PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 02:13:34PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > So far, what I built is a custom python/jinja script to generate the spec,
> > here is the code and example with mingw-zlib:
> > https://gitlab.com/-
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 02:13:34PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> So far, what I built is a custom python/jinja script to generate the spec,
> here is the code and example with mingw-zlib:
> https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2243878
>
> Ideally, we would use built-in RPM template facilities, but th
I would like to prefer to go with for Fedora 36:
> 3. do not ignore already broken weak rich deps (partially reverts the change)
It will enable lang packs user case but provides significant part of requested
functionality.
I created PR (https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/pull/1439)
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 10:19:35AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Also I don't know what are Daniel Berrange plans to have native and cross
> > packages built from the same spec. We might end up with a very different
> > solution then.
>
> It was this thread:
>
>
> https://lists.fedorapr
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 02:13:34PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 12:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37MingwUCRT
> > >
> > > Since mingw-*.spec are very repetitive and cumbersome to mo
Hi
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 12:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37MingwUCRT
> >
> > Since mingw-*.spec are very repetitive and cumbersome to modify (each
> > mingw32, mingw64, ucrt package has to be defined manually, and this
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 11:00 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2022-02-06 at 14:54 +0100, David Bold wrote:
> >
> >
> > I just tried to install Fedora on RPi, and I ended up on [1] where I
> > downloaded an image. That was unfortunately armv7 - and I needed to go
> > to [2] - which was not lin
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220207.0):
ID: 1121798 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Adding an alternative address for Nicolas too, just to be sure.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:08 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> There seem to be a common knowledge that nim has quit Fedora around a year
> ago.
>
> This is the mandatory email required by
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:52 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> perl-HTML-Tidy gnat, jplesnik, mmaslano, mspacek, 0 weeks
> ago
> orphan, ppisar
>
Anyone interested in keeping 'ikiwiki' and 'perl-Text-Markdown' around?
The following packages require above menti
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220207.0):
ID: 1121780 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 10:47:11AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:58 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to
> > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 2:17 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 8:12 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > gstreamer1 orphan, uraeus, wtaymans1
> weeks
> > > ago
> > > gstreamer1-plugins-baseorphan, uraeus, wtaymans
48 matches
Mail list logo
