Am 24.02.22 um 19:35 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 07:16:26PM +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
If someone is setting up a personal private mirror, I struggle
to understand a reason why they would pick FTP over HTTP(S)
today.
Because an ftp server is much lighter and much ea
I just realized that the cobbler django web interface is not compatible
with django 4.0 in Fedora 36. Upstream has dropped the web interface
completely with cobbler 3.3 and so I've decided to update to that in
Fedora 36. However, I do think this is worthy of a release note
somewhere (not sure
Hi, I have built Milvus package on Copr and reviewed it with Fedora-review. I
fixed these items that are flagged as fail,but there are some items that are
flagged as manual review needed. I am looking___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
In many cases, the build is killed during compilation itself.
I'd understand the situation, if it would consistently fail somewhere
during the testsuite on OOM errors, but it's weirder than that.
Until now, I didn't have this issue. Why now?
The tests are still important.
Through the years I took
Hello,
On Tuesday, March 1, 2022 6:43:57 PM EST Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> The subject of setuid came up in a private conversation recently, and to my
> surprise we don't seem to have it documented in the packaging guidelines:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
>
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 03:54:32PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Michael Catanzaro:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 2 2022 at 02:21:22 PM +0100, Dan Horák
> > wrote:
> >> those are weird, the build tasks have been restarted many times by the
> >> builder daemon, after something crashed there (OOM?) ...
> >
Hi!
On Friday, 25 February 2022 at 11:50, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> Hey,
>
> due to the lack of time I'm orphaning the following set of packages:
>
> augeas-vala
> clpeak
Taken. I have some interest in OpenCL and I use this tool.
> gimp-fourier-plugin
> gocl
> python-uinput
>
> Feel free to ste
Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 3/2/22 10:09, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> Additionally, Fedora uses GCC (intentionally) which requires patch work
>> for each release, but improves the quality of the resulting package.
>
> Would it be possible to make a one-off exception for Chromium?
There is actually
Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Arch uses the upstream *source* code, but not the binaries, if I
> understand correctly. They just don’t have anywhere near as many
> patches as Fedora does. I suspect this is a combination of factors.
> First, Arch builds use clang and more bundled libraries, so they
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 23:44, Ben Beasley wrote:
> Assuming you are already a packager, please follow this process:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
Excellent Ben, thanks.
The bug is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:42:38AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 28. 02. 22 v 18:24 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 07:45:27AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently
> > > discussed but this is really annoying
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 08:04:14PM -, Peter Oliver wrote:
> > I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently
> > discussed but this is really annoying. 6 days later is more than useless.
> > ...
> > Is there really nothing we can do about this?
>
> I think getting http
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 05:06:59PM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 3/2/22 04:35 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Mar 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> >
> > > I just tried to connect to copr [1] with firefox, and got a "Did Not
> > > Connect: Potential Security Issue" error.
> > >
> > > An
Matthew Miller wrote:
> I put #introductions in the default for "watching first post" because ...
> I think seeing and welcoming new people joining our community is a good
> default.
Frankly, I think most existing maintainers will not be interested in all
those self-introductions. If the new main
Assuming you are already a packager, please follow this process:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022, at 5:31 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems the maintainer of gnome-shell-extension-freon is not responsive
> righ
Hi,
it seems the maintainer of gnome-shell-extension-freon is not responsive
right now, I'd like to be added as co-maintainer so the extension can be
updated from 44 to 45, the current version does not work with GNOME 41
which is a bug in the current Fedora 35 release.
I guess I should submit a t
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 04:26:11PM -0500, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Some of the Ceph developers were investigating mold, since Ceph takes
> so long to build. Linking time is a problem for us with Ceph. But I
> don't know if those interested Ceph developers have done benchmarks
> yet.
>
> And the lack of
On 3/2/22 04:35 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I just tried to connect to copr [1] with firefox, and got a "Did Not Connect:
Potential Security Issue" error.
And apparently copr uses HSTS, so I cannot override it. Is anyone else having
the problem?
[1]
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I just tried to connect to copr [1] with firefox, and got a "Did Not Connect:
Potential Security Issue" error.
And apparently copr uses HSTS, so I cannot override it. Is anyone else
having the problem?
[1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/ki
Hi Steve,
I get the same error when I use the URL you linked. Typically when I
interface with copr, I'm using (maybe wrongly) the
'copr.fedorainfracloud.org' URL instead. To which point I can reach
the build you're trying to get to that way.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/kicad/kicad
I just tried to connect to copr [1] with firefox, and got a "Did Not Connect:
Potential Security Issue" error.
And apparently copr uses HSTS, so I cannot override it. Is anyone else having
the problem?
[1] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/kicad/kicad/build/3541862/
Steve
__
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 2:16 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 01:29:00PM -0500, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > In RPM packaging, of course, everything is built from scratch, usually with
> > LTO, and a package that takes a minute to link probably takes an hour to
> > build. While any wor
Hi
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 12:31 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:28:56PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Ability to modify these policies via configuration (the above one looks
> > like a build config) and ability to do global overrides and set the
> > hardening
I just built gap-pkg-radiroot 2.9 for F36 and Rawhide. The license
was GPL+, and is now GPLv2+. I do not expect this to have any
practical effect.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 04:07:43PM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Fedora cannot use the default tarball due to legal restrictions.
> > Additionally, Fedora uses
> > GCC (intentionally) which requires patch work for each release, but
> > improves the quality
> > of the resulting package.
>
> So GC
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 01:29:00PM -0500, Ben Beasley wrote:
> In RPM packaging, of course, everything is built from scratch, usually with
> LTO, and a package that takes a minute to link probably takes an hour to
> build. While any work that can be saved in an RPM build is helpful, I think
> the g
On Wed, Mar 2 2022 at 05:37:35 PM +, Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
Accordingly to upstream
presentation, it seems to have far better performances than lld,
especially when building big projects...
A WebKit developer put this to the test recently:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-03-02/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-03-02-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-03-02/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-03-02-16.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022
I’m not very familiar with mold’s pros and cons other than its speed,
but I think that architecture limitations[1] will limit widespread
adoption for the time being:
||
# mold can currently produce native binaries for x86, aarch64 and
riscv64 only
ExclusiveArch: x86_64 aa
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 5:06 AM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> What would it take to get tall of the users of QtWebEngine onto 6.2? I
> don’t think Fedora should ship any version of QtWebEngine except the
> latest, since only the latest version appears to get regular patches.
Well, it is slightly m
disclaimer: I'm a real noob about this topic, so forgive me if I'm
starting a useless discussion.
I came across 'mold' project [1], which is a GNU Gold / LLVM lld
replacement with multi-core support. Accordingly to upstream
presentation, it seems to have far better performances than lld,
especiall
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:28:56PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 2:14 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>
> >
> > Systemd 250 (coming in F36), has --security-policy switch which can be
> > used to enable/disable some of the checks. There is no way to tell
> > systemd-
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:34:48AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Because of #introductions tag is watched. But why? I have have not
> set anything like this by myself. And I am apparently not the only
> one who noticed:
I put #introductions in the default for "watching first post" because ... I
thin
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 08:13:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> It would probably be good to use more of those features, but you need
> to understand the service very well to know what systemd security
> features can be enabled for it.
I'd definitely love to see us put more effort i
On 3/2/22 10:09, Tom Callaway wrote:
> Apologies for the delays. My wife has been rather ill for a while, so my open
> source time has been greatly minimized lately.
I am so sorry.
> Fedora cannot use the default tarball due to legal restrictions.
Unfortunate but understandable. How much recur
Thanks, and thank you for maintaining chromium-freeworld in rpmfusion.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
> Fedora cannot use the default tarball due to legal restrictions.
> Additionally, Fedora uses
> GCC (intentionally) which requires patch work for each release, but improves
> the quality
> of the resulting package.
So GCC needs 125Gb of Ram to build chromium?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
> VAAPI hasn't worked for a long time on chromium. In "chrome://gpu" it shows
> "Video Decode: Software only. Hardware acceleration disabled" and it cannot be
> changed in "chrome://flags" either. This is the case for Fedora's packaged
> chromium and rpmfusion's chromium-freeworld. I encourage you
Hello,
I am currently working on my final project for senior year alongside Red
Hat! Our goal is to create a more "friendly" Fedora OS for university
students. We plan to create a club dedicated to this at the university and
to assist our fellow students and faculty with Fedora as it becomes more
> We ship VA-API integration, which Google doesn't offer.
VAAPI hasn't worked for a long time on chromium. In "chrome://gpu" it shows
"Video Decode: Software only. Hardware acceleration disabled" and it cannot be
changed in "chrome://flags" either. This is the case for Fedora's packaged
chromiu
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 9:19 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:08:07AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Those features provide tangible benefits to the community at large
> > that we would lose by "sloppy packaging". Instead of kvetching, why
> > not try helping? Mayb
Apologies for the delays. My wife has been rather ill for a while, so my open
source time has been greatly minimized lately.
Fedora cannot use the default tarball due to legal restrictions. Additionally,
Fedora uses GCC (intentionally) which requires patch work for each release, but
improves th
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/229 (x86_64), 8/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220301.n.0):
ID: 1156067 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1156067
ID: 1156100 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-
* Michael Catanzaro:
> On Wed, Mar 2 2022 at 02:21:22 PM +0100, Dan Horák
> wrote:
>> those are weird, the build tasks have been restarted many times by the
>> builder daemon, after something crashed there (OOM?) ...
>
> This was happening to me on armv7hl a few weeks ago. Kevin Fenzi
> investiga
Hi everyone,
It's that time already! The Fedora Linux 36 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting
is scheduled for Thursday 10 March at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At
this time, we will determine the status of the F36 Beta for the 15
March early target date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go
meeting, se
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220228.0):
ID: 1156421 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1156421
ID: 1156422 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:08:07AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Those features provide tangible benefits to the community at large
> that we would lose by "sloppy packaging". Instead of kvetching, why
> not try helping? Maybe *ask* Tom what you could do to help him ship
> newer versions?
Neal,
plea
On Wed, Mar 2 2022 at 02:21:22 PM +0100, Dan Horák
wrote:
those are weird, the build tasks have been restarted many times by the
builder daemon, after something crashed there (OOM?) ...
This was happening to me on armv7hl a few weeks ago. Kevin Fenzi
investigated and discovered that the build
Hello,
I've maintained python-aiohttp-cors because python-black required it, but it no
longer does, so I've just orphaned it.
The package is now only required by gns3-server.
The package builds, installs, builds with Python 3.11 (we have just pushed a
fix).
However, it appears dead upstream
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 36 RC 20220302.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 14:08:23 +0100
Michal Schorm wrote:
> Hello,
> for the last few days, I'm not able to finish my builds of the
> 'mariadb' package on s390x architecture.
>
> Those builds freeze, e.g. several of these:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83297826
> https:/
Hello,
for the last few days, I'm not able to finish my builds of the
'mariadb' package on s390x architecture.
Those builds freeze, e.g. several of these:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83297826
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=83296979
https://koji.fe
On 02/03/2022 12:44, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
That doesn’t explain why RPM Fusion gets updates so much more
quickly.
RPM Fusion don't need to manually strip ffmpeg, apply some specific
patches, etc.
In the case of something like Chromium, a sloppy package that gets
timely updates is better
OLD: Fedora-36-20220301.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220302.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 6:44 AM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 3/2/22 04:05, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 02/03/2022 01:21, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> What are the differences between the RPMFusion SRPM and the
> >> Fedora SRPM?
> >
> > RPM Fusion version includes all available mult
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 21/231 (x86_64), 20/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220301.n.0):
ID: 1155668 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso de
On 3/2/22 04:05, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 02/03/2022 01:21, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> What are the differences between the RPMFusion SRPM and the
>> Fedora SRPM?
>
> RPM Fusion version includes all available multimedia codecs.
That doesn’t explain why RPM Fusion gets updates so muc
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220301.0):
ID: 1156000 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 28. 02. 22 18:24, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 07:45:27AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
I almost wrote this a week ago but decided not to as it's been recently
discussed but this is really annoying. 6 days later is more than useless.
Previously it was blamed, at least partially,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220301.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220302.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:16
Upgraded packages: 86
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 116.00 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 02/03/2022 02:45, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
I am surprised that the answer is not to automatically
download and install Canonical’s Snap package
Absolutely no way. Everything must be built from sources on trusted
infra. No exceptions.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 02/03/2022 01:21, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
What are the differences between the RPMFusion SRPM and the
Fedora SRPM?
RPM Fusion version includes all available multimedia codecs.
Tom Callaway, what is the hardest part for you?
Packaging of Google's software is a nightmare. They do their b
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220301.0):
ID: 1155574 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
63 matches
Mail list logo
