Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything important for the agenda, so let's give folks a break
before the blocker review meeting!
If you're aware of anything it would be useful to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run
# F36 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2022-03-07
# Time: 17:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 3 proposed Beta blockers, 7 proposed Beta freeze
exception issues, and 2 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's
have a review meeting on Monday.
If you
. We use a git snapshot until the
# next release.
%global commit e0ecc32c37c6fe5af8e05b88f88da17006d321ed
%global date20220304
%global forgeurl https://github.com/facebook/infer
# Infer builds a modified version of clang
%global llvm_ver 12.0.1
# LTO leads to build failures, reason unk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061013
Bug ID: 2061013
Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000145 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test2-Suite
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 02:26:03PM -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> gettext-devel seems the more logical dependency, since it has the
> autoconf macros. And of course the guidelines for "Devel Packages"
> state "-devel packages must be used to contain files which are
> intended solely for development
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060062
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060186
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060627
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
I'm planning to retire the python-bitcoinlib package:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-bitcoinlib
It currently FTBFS on F36 and I have no use for it anymore. If anyone is
interested in fixing it and taking over, feel free to reach out.
Upstream:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060995
Bug ID: 2060995
Summary: perl-IPC-Shareable-1.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-IPC-Shareable
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060995
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details bellow:
BuilderException: Build started, but failure happened during post build
operations:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .',
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 13/229 (x86_64), 16/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220303.n.0):
ID: 1159732 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1159732
ID: 1159748 Test: x86_64
Hi all,
I have a question about the guidelines for "Handling Locale Files":
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_handling_locale_files
The guidelines state, "If the package uses gettext for translations,
add BuildRequires: gettext".
gettext-devel seems the more logical
OLD: Fedora-36-20220303.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220304.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 54
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
The Go/No-Go meeting for the Early target date (2022-03-15) is
Thursday, which means we want to have a release candidate by Tuesday.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. anaconda — When running anaconda on Wayland with two keyboard
layouts configured,
On Friday, March 4, 2022 4:17:01 PM CET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I think you missed the
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds
When the change landed, I had to fix all my packages to build although they
had been using out of source builds since the beginning.
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-17ae719cb2
syncthing-1.18.6-3.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-49fa7851f7
radare2-5.6.4-1.el8
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060156
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-7af28c8989 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Type-Tiny-1.012004-1.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033633
Bug 2033633 depends on bug 2032430, which changed state.
Bug 2032430 Summary: perl-Type-Tiny for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031798
Bug 2031798 depends on bug 2032430, which changed state.
Bug 2032430 Summary: perl-Type-Tiny for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033630
Bug 2033630 depends on bug 2032430, which changed state.
Bug 2032430 Summary: perl-Type-Tiny for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032430
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:14 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> systemd-analyze security shows whether units use systemd hardening
> features. Those units may well use other features, and may well be
> very secure.
My vague recollection from running systemd-analyze security
from some time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060156
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-b8f711ecbc has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
> On 3/4/22 10:17 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I think you missed the
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds
> (Targeted release: Fedora 33 ) and
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CMake/
I did not.
CMake in-source / out-of-source building
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b2c46a790d
radare2-5.6.4-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
cobbler-2.8.5-4.el7
Details about builds:
On 3/4/22 10:17 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 16:04 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 3:40 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
The fix is just remove "\ ." (the dot) on %cmake
That isn't a fix, that's a workaround for a broken CMake - atleast
that I believe, as
On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 16:04 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 3:40 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > The fix is just remove "\ ." (the dot) on %cmake
>
> That isn't a fix, that's a workaround for a broken CMake - atleast
> that I believe, as you can read in that BZ.
> I
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022, at 4:25 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2022, at 7:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> * OOm killer looks and says... oh hey, I need to kill something. This
>> kojid process/slice is taking up all the memory.
>> * kojid is killed.
>
> If we replaced Koji's backend with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060627
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-fc19dac8fa has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-fc19dac8fa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060627
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-50c45f6080 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-50c45f6080
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060627
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 3:40 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> The fix is just remove "\ ." (the dot) on %cmake
That isn't a fix, that's a workaround for a broken CMake - atleast
that I believe, as you can read in that BZ.
I haven't found anything on CMake upstream that would suggest such
change
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.14 bump and package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/8
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that
you are following:
``
6.14 bump and package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/8
___
perl-devel
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 17:00, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 3/2/22 14:14, epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Except that we are going to need python38-pytest, etc. in the EPEL8
> buildroot
> > if we are going to build (most of) the packages in the first place.
> That's
> > the problem
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.14 bump and package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/7
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 09:26 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> There is a new FTBFS for KiCad [1]. I filed an issue with KiCad [2]
> and got a comment from the project leader:
>
> This looks like cmake issue to me. For some reason cmake is
> creating an incorrect build folder:
>
> --
FTR there are more issues, e.g.:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057738
--
Michal Schorm
Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
--
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 3:27 PM Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> There is a new FTBFS for KiCad [1]. I filed an issue with KiCad [2]
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that
you are following:
``
6.14 bump and package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/7
___
perl-devel
There is a new FTBFS for KiCad [1]. I filed an issue with KiCad [2] and got a
comment from the project leader:
This looks like cmake issue to me. For some reason cmake is creating an
incorrect build folder:
-- Build files have been written to: /builddir/build/BUILD/kicad-6.0.2
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.14 bump and package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/6
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that
you are following:
``
6.14 bump and package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/6
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060062
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.14 bump and package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060900
Bug ID: 2060900
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Module-Install-TestBase
for EPEL-8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component:
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 19/231 (x86_64), 26/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
Michael J Gruber wrote:
> and I have to live with that non-descriptive changelog entry (due to
> %autochangelog).
That's why %autochangelog is such a bad idea. A manually maintained
%changelog can easily be edited in a followup commit.
Kevin Kofler
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Daemon` that
you are following:
``
6.14 bump and package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/5
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060627
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336
--- Comment #33 from Paul Howarth ---
Un-hobbled versions of perl-Net-SSH-Perl will need a new (to Fedora) package
perl-Crypt-Curve25519 (Bug #2060852).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Hello Pythonistas,
I intent to upgrade pytest in Rawhide to 7.0.x next week.
There are ~18 packages affected at build time and 2 almost-unused pytest
plugins are affected on runtime.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=PYTEST7
If you wish to test your changes against
Hello Pythonistas,
I intent to upgrade pytest in Rawhide to 7.0.x next week.
There are ~18 packages affected at build time and 2 almost-unused pytest
plugins are affected on runtime.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=PYTEST7
If you wish to test your changes against
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:01:20AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the
> > easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem.
>
> This gets odder.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 6:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the
> > easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem.
>
> This gets odder. I see
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the
> easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem.
This gets odder. I see from our internal spreadsheet and downloads
that some of the ocaml
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 12:42:03PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:27 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:04:04AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > So why not have the OCaml toolchain exposed in RHEL CRB? It sounds
> > > like it would be very
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220303.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220304.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:25
Upgraded packages: 308
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 116.86 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi everyone,
This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering)
Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this
report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat
(https://libera.chat/).
If you wish to read this in form of a blog post, check
On Do, 24.02.22 10:14, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
> I think instead you can use e.g. a systemd generator:
> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.generator.html
> The generator (which can be the same binary) can then enable iscsi.service
> only if the directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060186
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-0732951549 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0732951549
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220303.0):
ID: 1158979 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060186
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-PPPort-3.66-1.fc
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220303.0):
ID: 1158963 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543336
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment
65 matches
Mail list logo
