Fedora-36-20220504.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/229 (x86_64), 6/161 (aarch64) ID: 1254529 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1254529 ID: 1254564 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/t

Re: New version of mkksiso could use some testing

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 12:07:36PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:38 AM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > > > After the recent discussions about xorriso I realized that I could > > vastly simplify mkksiso, AND make it work as a normal user :) So I did. > > > > The PR is here: > > http

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Boost 1.78 rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 04. 05. 22 1:34, Thomas Rodgers wrote: We are starting the rebuilds for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37Boost178 in the f37-boost side tag. If your package depends on Boost, or just if you see a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.78" commit

License change: python-starlette is just “BSD” again

With release 0.20.0, the bundled subset of pep562 is removed upstream, and the License field changes back to just “BSD”. On 4/23/22 20:33, Ben Beasley wrote: In release 0.19.1, python-starlette adds one Python module under the MIT license (bundling a subset of python-pep562, which I have handle

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

Ondrej Nosek kirjoitti 4.5.2022 klo 18.01: Hi all, A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading source files (from dist-git) that are not used in the specfile and therefore downloading them would be wasting of resources and time. The original request was opened here [1] a

Re: How to find out whether a package is used

On 04/05/2022 17:19, Milan Crha wrote: is there a way to figure out whether a package is used by any user? No. My idea is to remove the evolution-mapi package. It is kept alive upstream for users connecting to very old Microsoft Exchange servers in the Evolution. Just orphan it. If someone

Re: New version of mkksiso could use some testing

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:38 AM Brian C. Lane wrote: > > After the recent discussions about xorriso I realized that I could > vastly simplify mkksiso, AND make it work as a normal user :) So I did. > > The PR is here: > https://github.com/weldr/lorax/pull/1228 > > It only depends on xorriso and im

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

On 04. 05. 22 17:21, Petr Pisar wrote: V Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:14:24PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a): For me personally, opt-out would be better, since the logic is right most of the time. And doesn't break it, in the rare cases, building packages in Koji? When a source package is

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 17:01 +0200, Ondrej Nosek wrote: > Hi all, > > A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading > source files (from dist-git) that are not used in the specfile and > therefore downloading them would be wasting of resources and time. > The original request

Fedora-Rawhide-20220504.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 10/231 (x86_64), 21/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220503.n.0): ID: 1253787 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso de

libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.24)

libgps from the gpsd package had an API and ABI break. As usual, the following packages need to be rebuilt: collectd direwolf foxtrotgps marble plasma-workspace vfrnav viking I tried to rebuild them locally. It seems only direwolf needs a new patch. The direwolf-gpsapi12 patch needs to be replace

New version of mkksiso could use some testing

After the recent discussions about xorriso I realized that I could vastly simplify mkksiso, AND make it work as a normal user :) So I did. The PR is here: https://github.com/weldr/lorax/pull/1228 It only depends on xorriso and implantisomd5 so I may also split it out into a subpackage so you don'

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

V Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:14:24PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a): > For me personally, opt-out would be better, since the logic is right most of > the time. > And doesn't break it, in the rare cases, building packages in Koji? When a source package is built in Koji, sources are downloaded

How to find out whether a package is used

Hi, is there a way to figure out whether a package is used by any user? I know with mirrors it's basically impossible to know whether it had been downloaded at all, but I do not know whether there can be involved other techniques to figure it out, batter than dropping a package and wait whe

Re: fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

For me personally, opt-out would be better, since the logic is right most of the time. That being said, how about adding a value for this in $HOME/.config/rpkg/fedpkg.conf? That way, you have some default value, which can be overridden by the config, which in turn can be overridden by the opt-in

[Test-Announce] REMINDER: Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting tomorrow

Hi everyone, The Fedora Linux 36 Final Go/No-Go meeting[1] is scheduled for Thursday 5 May at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will determine the status of the F36 Final for the 10 May target date #3[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the wiki[3]. [1] https://ca

fedpkg sources - downloading unused source files: opt-in/opt-out

Hi all, A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids downloading source files (from dist-git) that are not used in the specfile and therefore downloading them would be wasting of resources and time. The original request was opened here [1] and implemented here [2]. The logic is part of

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220504.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220503.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220504.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 125 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 140 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 49.37 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:52 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 04. 05. 22 v 9:32 Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a): > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:43 AM David Woodhouse wrote: > >> On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 19:33 +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: > >>> This is the reason why the proposal contains extensive methods to

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dne 04. 05. 22 v 9:32 Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a): On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:43 AM David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 19:33 +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: This is the reason why the proposal contains extensive methods to test whether things are going to break by modifying the crypto-po

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220504.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220502.0): ID: 1253708 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1253708 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)

Fedora-36-20220504.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/229 (x86_64), 6/161 (aarch64) ID: 1253312 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1253312 ID: 1253347 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/t

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:43 AM David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-05-02 at 19:33 +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: > > This is the reason why the proposal contains extensive methods to test > > whether things are going to break by modifying the crypto-policy or using > > bpftrace. Unfortunately the