Hi,
I'm planning on upgrading tinyxml2 to version 9 in rawhide in the coming
week, which will include a soname bump. Affected packages are:
Macaulay2-0:1.19.1-2.fc37.src
bullet-0:3.08-3.fc36.src
cppcheck-0:2.7.4-1.fc37.src
dvblinkremote-0:0.2.0-0.25.beta.fc36.src
gazebo-0:10.1.0-27.fc36.src
li
Rawhide is rolling so im confused what you mean by 35? Rawhide is going
towards 37 Beta...
Also for Rawhide i get all the configs in git and just do nightly net
installs
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 2:15 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:35:44AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> > He
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:35:44AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
> I have a VM that I keep perpetually on Rawhide for testing that has
> working fine with updates until the latest 5.18 kernels; it just
> hangs. Nothing is shown on the screen, no kernel panics, just
> hangs. The VM is running
Hey all-
I have a VM that I keep perpetually on Rawhide for testing that has working
fine with updates until the latest 5.18 kernels; it just hangs. Nothing is
shown on the screen, no kernel panics, just hangs. The VM is running on ESXi
6.0 on a X7350 Xeon (it’s a Dell PowerEdge R900 server FWI
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220511.0):
ID: 1265264 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1265264
ID: 1265266 Test: x86_64 IoT-
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 12/231 (x86_64), 23/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
> On 12/05/2022 07:43, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> I think these kernel modules should be upstreamed directly to the Linux
> kernel.
That would block the use of 390xx, 470xx and mai, see
http://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/515.43.04/README/kernel_open.html
___
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64)
ID: 1265055 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1265055
ID: 1265057 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignitio
On 12/05/2022 11:40, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
And it seems that the most immediate impact we will see is the changes
and improvements in the noveau driver.
This will only be possible if NVIDIA releases GPU specs.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 12/05/2022 07:43, Miro Hrončok wrote:
As far as I know this would still not be acceptable in Fedora due to the
"No external kernel modules" rule, right?
I think these kernel modules should be upstreamed directly to the Linux
kernel.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
_
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220511.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220512.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 235
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 51.28 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
I don't think Nvidia has any intention to add this to mainline kernel as it
would block use of the propriety driver.
I zero interest in packaging it for rpmfusion as it's so limited, see
http://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/515.43.04/README/kernel_open.html
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220511.0):
ID: 1264513 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi,
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 7:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Fedorans. I suppose this changes things, right? But how?
>
>
> https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-releases-open-source-gpu-kernel-modules/
>
> As far as I know this would still not be acceptable in Fedora due to the
> "No
> ex
> Hello Fedorans. I suppose this changes things, right? But how?
>
> https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-releases-open-source-gpu-kernel-modules/
In the short term this changes little, the should be build-able
similar to how the other proprietary NV kernel modules are now though.
In time they
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 08:00:18AM +0200, Christoph Erhardt wrote:
Hi all,
I'm willing to revive python-jenkins-job-builder by updating it to the latest
release 4.0.0 and backporting an upstream patch.
I already have a working Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/
sicherha/python-
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 09:38:49AM +0200, Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Can you try to unpush from testing and then re-push?
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JF2PBQCZOL6MTWQUXEV3GJ7REGL2ITL3/
Thanks for that pointer. I just unpu
Dne 11. 05. 22 v 20:45 Chris Adams napsal(a):
Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said:
Yeah, I agree. I think Python upstream should own up to the fact that
adding '.' to sys.path was always a mistake.
Yeah, perl bit that bullet a while ago now, dropping '.' from @INC.
It's really
Hi Richard,
Can you try to unpush from testing and then re-push?
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JF2PBQCZOL6MTWQUXEV3GJ7REGL2ITL3/
Kind regards,
Mikel
Hau idatzi du Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak
(2022 mai. 12, og. (09:3
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3a7569aa77
Every day it tries to push it to stable, every day that fails.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - F
20 matches
Mail list logo
