Re: F37 proposal: Install Using GPT on x86_64 BIOS by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Am 30.05.2022 um 04:28 schrieb Chris Murphy : > > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 6:56 AM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Fedora Server WG discussed the proposal and insists that the proposal be >> deferred until Anaconda can install software raid on biosboot systems with >> GPT (see https://bu

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Fedora-Cloud-36-20220530.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220529.0): ID: 1283659 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Ceph, virt packages (Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:31:21AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fed

Re: F37 proposal: Install Using GPT on x86_64 BIOS by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

Chris Murphy wrote: > What's the basis for holding up this feature though? Yes it's a bug, Making the setup with the bug the default turns the longstanding bug into a regression (for the default setup) though. There also seems to be no reasonable workaround, or is there a checkbox or dropdown s

Re: F37 proposal: Install Using GPT on x86_64 BIOS by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Sun, May 29, 2022, at 6:55 AM, Peter Boy wrote: > > Fedora Server WG discussed the proposal and insists that the proposal > be deferred until Anaconda can install software raid on biosboot > systems with GPT (see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088113 and > https://lists.fedor

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220530.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220529.0): ID: 1283698 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: F37 proposal: Install Using GPT on x86_64 BIOS by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Am 30.05.2022 um 11:39 schrieb Colin Walters : > > Just a note: Fedora CoreOS has used a hybrid BIOS/UEFI setup since its > inception, and also supports this "mirrored boot" setup: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-coreos/storage/#_reconfiguring_the_root_filesystem > https://gi

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220530.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220529.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220530.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 39 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:66.85 KiB

Re: Ceph, virt packages (Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On 30. 05. 22 10:09, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 09:31:21AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please d

Rust Stack Spring Cleaning (May 2022 Edition)

Hello Rust packagers, Following up on my previous emails, there are still a lot of Rust packages that were imported to Fedora, but the recommended "initial setup" for them was never finished. I have started by adding them all "rust-*" packages to koschei, which makes it way easier for me to see a

Fedora-Rawhide-20220530.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 12/161 (aarch64), 9/231 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed i

Fedora 34 is going EOL in one week

Hello all, Fedora 34 will go end of life for updates and support on 2022-06-07 No further updates, including security updates, will be available for Fedora 34 after the said date. All the updates of Fedora 34 being pushed to stable will be stopped as well. Fedora 35 will continue to receive updat

Re: Unretire ufo2ft

Benson Muite kirjoitti 28.5.2022 klo 22.00: Hi, Would like to unretire ufo2ft[1][2].  The package is useful for building font packages from source, which the Fedora font packaging policy encourages. That should be fine, because the it seems that back in the day, the package was retired just

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Friday, April 29, 2022 5:49:05 PM EDT Ben Cotton wrote: > Cryptographic policies will be tightened in Fedora 38-39, > SHA-1 signatures will no longer be trusted by default. > Fedora 37 specifically doesn't come with any change of defaults, > and this Fedora Change is an advance warning filed for

future development/maintenance of rpkg-util

Hello, I need to step down as a developer/maintainer of rpkg-util (https://pagure.io/rpkg-util) as I no longer have the incentive or knowledge required to maintain the project well enough. The purpose of this tool was to provide a distro-agnostic rpm package manager - that translates to: 1) it i

Re: Unretire ufo2ft

On 5/30/22 22:28, Otto Urpelainen wrote: Benson Muite kirjoitti 28.5.2022 klo 22.00: Hi, Would like to unretire ufo2ft[1][2].  The package is useful for building font packages from source, which the Fedora font packaging policy encourages. That should be fine, because the it seems that back

News from printing world aka PWG May 2022 meetup

Hi all, it is another year and we have an aggregated report of what changed in the printing world since the last year. The whole notes are as the attachment, but highlights are: - myself (Zdenek Dohnal) being release manager for CUPS 2.4.x series - Till Kamppeter wrote printer applications w

Re: ROCm-OpenCL package

I'm up for a review swap if there's no takers. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduc

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:34 PM Garry T. Williams wrote: > > On Friday, April 29, 2022 5:49:05 PM EDT Ben Cotton wrote: > > Cryptographic policies will be tightened in Fedora 38-39, > > SHA-1 signatures will no longer be trusted by default. > > Fedora 37 specifically doesn't come with any change

exploded git tree for kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35

Hi, where can I find the exploded git tree for "kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35"? The tree at is no good; it does not have tags beyond .fc33. Thanks Laszlo ___ devel mailing list -- devel@list

Re: exploded git tree for kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35

On Tue, 31 May 2022 08:39:28 +0200 Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Hi, > > where can I find the exploded git tree for "kernel-5.17.4-200.fc35"? > > The tree at > is > no good; it does not have tags beyond .fc33. Fedora kernels now live

Re: F37 Proposal: Strong crypto settings: phase 3, forewarning 1/2 (System-Wide Change proposal)

V Tue, May 31, 2022 at 08:07:57AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin napsal(a): > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:34 PM Garry T. Williams > wrote: > > On Friday, April 29, 2022 5:49:05 PM EDT Ben Cotton wrote: > > > Cryptographic policies will be tightened in Fedora 38-39, > > > SHA-1 signatures will no longer