Seen at least on F36 x86_64: The package
libreoffice-postgresql-7.3.4.2-4.fc36.x86_64 (built 2022-07-12) contains
a library /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/libpostgresql-sdbc-impllo.so
that links against libpq (built with -lpq), so the library has
0x0001 (NEEDED) Shar
Il 23/08/22 22:36, zonexpertconsult...@outlook.com ha scritto:
> Does anyone know how to contact Michal Ambroz a.k.a. rebus?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120834
>
> This is blocking the ZoneMinder package in RPMFusion:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115572
>
> T
Not sure what to make of this abipkgdiff report:
changes of 'libcfitsio.so.9.4.0.0'===
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 239 Changed, 0 Added functions
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
239 functions with some indirect sub-ty
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:14 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
...
> This is simply a non-starter.
...
> PCRE 1 needs to remain as a fully supported compatibility library for the
> foreseeable future.
...
> In the end, my suggestion if you are unable to deal with the security
> vulnerabilities is
Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Summary ==
> Upstream stopped the support for the old 'pcre' package. It only
> supports the new 'pcre2' version, so Fedora should deprecate it so it
> could later be retired and removed from Fedora entirely.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:ljavorsk| Lukas Javorsky]]
> * Em
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > The CC0 has been banned for new packages in Fedora.
>
> Banned for code, not content. Icons are not code.
Good point! Thanks for the correction.
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:59 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 Lyes Saadi wrote:
> > Fortunately, Icon Development Kit is under CC0, so we're kinda saved
> > from a Licensing apocalypse (although, I have to admit that this is not
> > ideal).
>
> The CC0 has been banned
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 Lyes Saadi wrote:
> Fortunately, Icon Development Kit is under CC0, so we're kinda saved
> from a Licensing apocalypse (although, I have to admit that this is not
> ideal).
The CC0 has been banned for new packages in Fedora.
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/H
On Tuesday, August 23, 2022 1:16:00 PM CDT Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> We have a new R version sitting on a side tag (f37-build-side-55653)
> for a few weeks now, where packages are being rebuilt as time permits.
Can this perhaps be handled differently next time? I admit that I'm not
familiar with the R
Hello devel,
I recently packaged blackbox-terminal, but, someone packaging another
app, extension-manager noticed that his package conflicted with mine,
and a `dnf whatprovides` later noticed that it also conflicted with
cozy*. I soon discovered that all those apps shared icons from the Icon
On 23. 08. 22 23:46, Fabio Valentini wrote:
even if the advice is: "yes, retire the packages, rather
than leave them broken, they can be added back once they have been
fixed"
Knowing nothing about Pantheon or GObject C, I do think this is always better
than noninstallable packages. So if all o
On Tue, Aug 23 2022 at 11:46:26 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini
wrote:
- elementary-mail: https://github.com/elementary/mail/issues/793
broken because it uses webkit2gtk-4.0, but also evolution-data-server,
which has moved to libsoup3
fails to build / install on Fedora 37+
If this one does not direc
Hello all,
I'm not quite sure how to approach this problem, but as it stands, the
packages for the Pantheon DE and associated "elementary" applications
will probably be mostly broken when Fedora 37 will be released.
Every major GNOME update comes with problems for Pantheon (especially
due to mutt
Does anyone know how to contact Michal Ambroz a.k.a. rebus?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120834
This is blocking the ZoneMinder package in RPMFusion:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115572
Thanks,
Andy
___
devel mailing l
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/libsoup_3:_Part_Two
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Comm
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PcreDeprecation
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
==
Today we reached the Code Complete (100% complete) milestone on the
F37 schedule: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-key-tasks.html
At this time, all F37 Changes should be 100% complete. You can
indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracker to the ON_QA status. If
you need to defer
On 23. 08. 22 18:16, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Remainder : 1 package
1 asymptote-2.81-2.fc37.src.rpm
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2050712
- Previous asymptote build was successful, but now build fails also for f38.
Looks like pdfetex is segfaulting.
https://bugzill
Hi all,
We have a new R version sitting on a side tag (f37-build-side-55653)
for a few weeks now, where packages are being rebuilt as time permits.
Unfortunately, F37 is not rawhide anymore, so the question is whether
this side tag could be safely merged both in F37 and rawhide when it
is ready.
On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 01:16 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/08/23 16:58:
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote on 2022/08/23 10:12:
> > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:23:51AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > > > Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54:
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 202
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2022-08-23)
===
Meeting started by mhayden at 17:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-08-23/fesco.2022-08-23-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:07:26AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220822.n.0
> NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220823.n.0
...snip...
> = DROPPED IMAGES =
> Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree aarch64
> Path:
> Kinoite/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-aarch64-
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:31:03AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-08-22 at 08:43 +0200, Christoph Erhardt wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Sunday, 21 August 2022 17:29:56 CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > I don't disagree that glibc should respect what distros set, I'm
> > > just
> > > asking u
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/08/23 16:58:
Kevin Fenzi wrote on 2022/08/23 10:12:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:23:51AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola
wrote:
Hello,
gsl will be updated from version 2.
io_uring (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_uring) is an important
kernel facility, essentially an alternate way of dispatching system
calls more efficiently. It's used in a lot of high performance
situations. Although you can talk to it directly, most users should
be using liburing, a C library.
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
The relevant policy is Bundled software policy [1]. Unlike in the past, a
package does not need a FESCo exception to bundle dependencies. However, the
requirements of that policy are not being met here: The reason for bundling
should be recorded in
On 23. 08. 22 15:17, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 6:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
Unfortunately, Python-2.0.1 is still not listed at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/
I've attempted to update the files used to generate the two lists so
hopefully this
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 9:24 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 02:03:57PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > ceph also uses rocksdb, so I think I'd want rocksdb to be rebuilt
> before ceph
> > > (i.e. before I rebuild ceph).
> >
> > AFAIK nothing should need to be r
Hi,
I am interested in adopting the orphaned flare package[1]. It doesn't
appear to have any complicated requirements. My local build on a recent
git clone succeeded without effort.
As I'm not in the packagers group, yet, I will have to complete the
sponsoring process first. For that I am lo
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 02:03:57PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 08:50:48AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 8:47 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 6:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Unfortunately, Python-2.0.1 is still not listed at
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/
I've attempted to update the files used to generate the two lists so
hopefully this change will show up in the generated documen
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 08:50:48AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 8:47 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > - ceph
> > ...
> > - rocksdb
>
>
> I built ceph, qemu, samba & plocat
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 08:51:12AM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:24:10AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:38:26AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> > > I'd suggest doing a mock, copr or scratch build and running abipkgdif
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 8:47 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > - ceph
> > ...
> > - rocksdb
>
>
> I built ceph, qemu, samba & plocate with the new liburing 2.2 and
> there didn't seem to be any problem with liburing. Samba howe
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> - ceph
> - folly
> - glusterfs
> - plocate
> - qemu
> - raft
> - rocksdb
> - root
> - samba
I built ceph, qemu, samba & plocate with the new liburing 2.2 and
there didn't seem to be any problem with liburing. Samba however
fail
OLD: Fedora-37-20220822.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220823.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 77
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 60.84 MiB
Size of dropped packages:31.56 MiB
Hi all,
Today's an important day on the Fedora 37 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all, today is the Bodhi updates-testing
activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 37 packages must
be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant
requirements[3] before
On ti, 23 elo 2022, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:38:26AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
I'd suggest doing a mock, copr or scratch build and running abipkgdiff
comparing current rawhide and the updated binary packages. It'll tell
you if there are any subtle A
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220822.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220823.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:8
Upgraded packages: 90
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 61.14 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello.
I plan to update the license tag of Python interpreters in Fedora from "Python"
to "Python-2.0.1".
See this PR which added it to fedora-license-data:
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/merge_requests/61
See this PR to Python 3.11 (to be backported to older Pythons la
Of course, only the deprecation will be moved to F38.
The removal is stalled until the deprecation is completed. Once done, the
new Fedora change will start from the beginning, containing the removal.
It looks like the community is okay with moving the deprecation to F38, so
I'll move it.
On Tue
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:24:10AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:38:26AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > I'd suggest doing a mock, copr or scratch build and running abipkgdiff
> > comparing current rawhide and the updated binary packages. It'll te
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:38:26AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> I'd suggest doing a mock, copr or scratch build and running abipkgdiff
> comparing current rawhide and the updated binary packages. It'll tell
> you if there are any subtle ABI differences.
Here's a scratch build:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:23 AM Lukas Javorsky wrote:
>
> Hello Zbigniew,
>
> I would love to have it on F38, but I'm not sure it would be enough time for
> all of the maintainers whose packages depend on the old pcre.
>
> Ben, do you think we can make this to F38?
Moving the *deprecation* to F
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> io_uring (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_uring) is an important
> kernel facility, essentially an alternate way of dispatching system
> calls more efficiently. It's used in a lot of high performance
> situations. Although you
On Tuesday, 23 August 2022 at 11:24, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
[...]
> We haven't updated liburing for "a while", since April 2021 to
> liburing 2.0. There have been several upstream versions since then,
> the latest is liburing 2.2, released in June.
>
> In theory this version is compatible and
io_uring (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_uring) is an important
kernel facility, essentially an alternate way of dispatching system
calls more efficiently. It's used in a lot of high performance
situations. Although you can talk to it directly, most users should
be using liburing, a C library.
Hello Zbigniew,
I would love to have it on F38, but I'm not sure it would be enough time
for all of the maintainers whose packages depend on the old pcre.
Ben, do you think we can make this to F38?
Thank you for answering.
Lukas
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 3:33 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Thu, Aug
We are working on this and hope to have an update soon.
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en
Kevin Fenzi wrote on 2022/08/23 10:12:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:23:51AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola
wrote:
Hello,
gsl will be updated from version 2.6 to 2.7.1 which changes the
soversion fro
Dne 23. 08. 22 v 0:36 Jilayne Lovejoy napsal(a):
That would be a bit hard since a large number of the SPDX ids are the same as
the Fedora short names. That being said, some of the more commonly found
licenses are not the same.
This is unfortunate. I still think it was mistake to not provide
51 matches
Mail list logo
