Jens-Ulrik Petersen skrev:
> Do you want to try adding native compilation your package?
As it turns out, emacs-vm might not be the best package for this
experiment. I could not get VM to work with native compilation.
Instead, I had to turn the native compilation off completely for all
vm*.el files
Hi,
Also https://packages.fedoraproject.org/ is new
On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 10:32 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> this is just a reminder that there is a Fedora Packager Dashboard
> that you
> might not know about:
>
> Go to https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
>
> Ent
On Sat, 2022-08-27 at 01:44 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Tomáš Popela wrote:
> > This is an early heads-up about GTK 2 removal from RHEL 10+ (the
> > gtk2
> > package was marked as unwanted in ELN with
> > https://github.com/minimization/content-resolver-input/commit/b6d44e496f46bd2444e8e
Hi Fedorians,
The license of ansible-collection-community-mysql has been updated from
"GPLv3+ and Python" to "GPL-3.0-or-later AND PSF-2.0 AND BSD-2-Clause".
See
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ansible-collection-community-mysql/c/242bcaa709334c0a5ec0d78d1a2da3daaae532ce?branch=rawhide.
--
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I think it
> is important to remember that the page is _supposed_ to be "dense".
> It is intended to pack a lot of information into a small area
It leaves plenty of empty space on my screen. It seems to prioritize
aesthetics over information density.
Björn Per
On 8/26/22 12:22, Daniel Micay via devel wrote:
> Also, you hardened_malloc doesn't use a thread cache for security
> reasons. It invalidates many of the security properties. If you compare
> to glibc malloc in the light configuration with tcache disabled in glibc
> malloc it will compare well, and
OLD: Fedora-37-20220826.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220827.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1013.73 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
This is done now. I have created the Bodhi updates for F38/Rawhide and
F37/Branched. Thanks for everyone’s help in completing the necessary
rebuilds!
F38: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2eed8152f6
F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-014e78ee9d
On 8/15
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 06:21:23PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:43 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> > wrote:
> > > I'll forget the meaning and the numbers will go back to being visual
> > > clutter. It would be immensely helpful
> > > to have some
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220826.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220827.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 40
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 240
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 242.90 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 25.8.2022 klo 11.32:
Hello folks,
this is just a reminder that there is a Fedora Packager Dashboard that
you might not know about:
Go to https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
I agree with others, this is a great and very useful service. In attempt
to make it
Jarek Prokop kirjoitti 26.8.2022 klo 17.50:
Hi,
Usually for Rawhide updates CLOSED RAWHIDE + add NVR into `fixed in
version`
if only Rawhide fixes that bug (e.g., a new software version), that
should be enough.
But it seems auto updates can take care of the tickets if you specify
the bugs v
Sven Lankes kirjoitti 26.8.2022 klo 0.03:
Non-responsive maintainer policy [2]. This package has CVE bugs
open [3],
There was _one_ CVE bug and that was for the old version of xtrabackup
that is not shipped for fedora. I have just closed that bug.
The other CVEs are for EPEL builds - while I
Il 26/08/22 19:00, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 05:30:35PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> With the exclusion of *-team, *-sig and *-maint, I think packaging
>> rights should be removed from those users.
> I think these are users who manually removed themselve
14 matches
Mail list logo
