On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsRepackaging
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be impl
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 08:33:38AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> >... it [memtest.efi] can be accessed by a trivial two line command.
>
> Please write the literal two-line command here.
> It takes too long to search documentation or invent the code,
> and the various imagined versions might have bug
=
#fedora-meeting: ELN (2022-10-07)
=
Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:01:12 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-10-07/eln.2022-10-07-16.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
Once upon a time, Mattia Verga said:
> Il 07/10/22 17:28, Chris Adams ha scritto:
> > Once upon a time, Mattia Verga said:
> >> I don't understand, why RPM automatically adds a dependency on a noarch
> >> subpackage which consists only of data files?
> >>
> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/
Il 07/10/22 17:28, Chris Adams ha scritto:
> Once upon a time, Mattia Verga said:
>> I don't understand, why RPM automatically adds a dependency on a noarch
>> subpackage which consists only of data files?
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2072456
>>
>> Any idea?
> Becaus
... it [memtest.efi] can be accessed by a trivial two line command.
Please write the literal two-line command here.
It takes too long to search documentation or invent the code,
and the various imagined versions might have bugs.
___
devel mailing list
Once upon a time, Mattia Verga said:
> I don't understand, why RPM automatically adds a dependency on a noarch
> subpackage which consists only of data files?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2072456
>
> Any idea?
Because it isn't just data files? /usr/share/xephem/aux
I don't understand, why RPM automatically adds a dependency on a noarch
subpackage which consists only of data files?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2072456
Any idea?
Mattia
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
-- Petr
Possibly related (?), today I've noticed that opening a .fedorapeople
website in a browser I get an error about expired certificate...
Also prevents downloading spec and srpm files.
Mattia
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
Autorpmspec requiring direct use of git (with commit --allow-empty) because
rpmdev-bumpspec can't be used is a problem. Fedpkg needs to grow the
ability to handle this, preferably transparently if possible. But that's
another thread...
I just performed a:
$ git commit --allow-empty -m "Rebuild fo
Il 07/10/22 13:50, Petr Pisar ha scritto:
> V Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 08:17:15PM -0500, Richard Shaw napsal(a):
>> I'm still getting this on occasion and have no idea what the issue is:
>>
>> $ fedpkg new-sources OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz
>> Uploading: OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz
>> ##
Earlier discussion:
https://www.mail-archive.com/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/msg169800.html
Current memtest86+ 5.x requires non-UEFI, which makes it increasingly
irrelevant to modern hardware. memtest86 forked into a proprietary
product some time ago. However there is hope because upstream
me
Dne 07. 10. 22 v 14:19 Paul Howarth napsal(a):
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 14:38:38 +0200
This is good point. I have already forget the details. So if there
was embedded just the right amount of information in the main data,
we would not need the full list (and lazy loading). Currently, the
data contain
OLD: Fedora-37-20221006.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20221007.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 14:38:38 +0200
> This is good point. I have already forget the details. So if there
> was embedded just the right amount of information in the main data,
> we would not need the full list (and lazy loading). Currently, the
> data contains e.g. /usr/bin/*, which is useful for inst
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 14:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 14:18 Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 10/6/22 11:55, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 9:18 Otto Liljalaakso napsal(a):
Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 6.10.2022 klo 2.33:
On 06. 10. 22 1:21, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
Recently, I have run
V Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 08:17:15PM -0500, Richard Shaw napsal(a):
> I'm still getting this on occasion and have no idea what the issue is:
>
> $ fedpkg new-sources OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz
> Uploading: OpenImageIO-2.4.4.2.tar.gz
> #
> 52.0%Could not execute ne
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 01:22:01PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > We need PCRs to cover at minimum
> >
> > 1. Machine firmware
> > 2. Bootloader(s)
> > 3. Bootloader configuration
> > 4. Booted kernel
> > 5. Booted initrd
> > 6. Booted cmdline
>
> > I
On 07. 10. 22 12:56, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 19:51 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 06. 10. 22 15:04, Kalev Lember wrote:
I guess a transition plan (if we make up our minds that it makes sense to do
it) could be to first make sure the provides are autogenerated, then do a
mass rebuild,
Dne 06. 10. 22 v 19:51 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 06. 10. 22 15:04, Kalev Lember wrote:
I guess a transition plan (if we make up our minds that it makes
sense to do it) could be to first make sure the provides are
autogenerated, then do a mass rebuild, let people try it out in their
packages
Hi all,
Fedora Developer Portal contains information various information on
technologies that require update from time to time to work with current
Fedoras.
We have identified a few pages that require updating as they contain old
information,
outdated (or unsupported) versions of the technolo
I took a look at epel-rpm-macros. Interestingly, in EPEL9,
the package has "Recommends: fpc-srpm-macros". [0]
Despite this, when I try building in the side tag,
the package isn't pulled in. I guess koji is configured
not to pull in weak deps?
Anyway, I've opened a PR on epel-rpm-macros
to change t
22 matches
Mail list logo
