Notification time stamped 2022-10-05 04:46:21 UTC
From f3b8d722b50be5c52f0156240a948631e60da6c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Oct 05 2022 04:46:07 +
Subject: Upstream merged the Type::Tie distribution into the Type::Tiny
distribution.
---
diff --git a/.gitignore
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/10/10 2:46:
Hello team,
openshadinglanguage 1.12.6.2 only successfully built on x86_64 architecture but
failed on others due to the following errors:
In file included from
/builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/src/liboslexec/oslexec_pvt.h:42,
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Gallagher writes:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:29 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> *snip*
> When a Node.js release goes out of support, we have a question to
> answer: do we Obsolete it with a newer version? If so, which one? The
> most recent version or the oldest one? It will not
Hello team,
openshadinglanguage 1.12.6.2 only successfully built on x86_64
architecture but failed on others due to the following errors:
In file included from
/builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/src/liboslexec/oslexec_pvt.h:42,
from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133144
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-5c248a39bb has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0dc9b5c110
seamonkey-2.53.14-3.el8
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-56709b917a
weechat-3.6-1.el8
0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-0d956e603a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0d956e603a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a5707af904 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a5707af904
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1c6c522b07
weechat-3.6-1.el9
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c5646c5693
apptainer-1.1.2-1.el9
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133215
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133144
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
OLD: Fedora-37-20221008.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20221009.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 37 Branched 20221009.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221008.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221009.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 56
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Thanks!
Daniel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 10:25:08AM -, Daniel Rusek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a note. If someone from RPM Fusion who is interested in packaging
> full mesa-va-drivers package reads this, please, make sure that the
> package also contains valid AppStream metadata and is showing in GNOME
>
It is just a simple, short xml file, not a big deal for maintainers, but
actually quite a big deal for many end users. If anyone from RPM Fusion needs a
help with this file, feel free to drop me a line. :-)
___
devel mailing list --
Because Fedora also targets regular users who are not experts and also because
it would make it much easier for all users to find and install that package
(for example by entering "h264" in GNOME Shell Overview on a RPM Fusion enabled
system) instead of requiring them to search/install the
On Sun, 2022-10-09 at 10:25 +, Daniel Rusek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a note. If someone from RPM Fusion who is interested in
> packaging full mesa-va-drivers package reads this, please, make sure
> that the package also contains valid AppStream metadata and is
> showing in GNOME Software /
Here is an example of the driver component AppStream metadata type:
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Driver.html
You can probably ignore the tag.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Hello,
Just a note. If someone from RPM Fusion who is interested in packaging full
mesa-va-drivers package reads this, please, make sure that the package also
contains valid AppStream metadata and is showing in GNOME Software / KDE
Discover the same way as, for example, NVIDIA driver does. It
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133212
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
Am 05.10.22 um 23:07 schrieb Chris Murphy:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, at 3:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
3. "Boot menu" in GUI? Given that one can reach the GUI, why it should
not be possible to choose the boot entry for next boot? Or even choose
to open FW setup.
This could solve this other problem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131444
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131442
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
26 matches
Mail list logo
