There's a python-mysql and python-mysqlclient packages and it's been an
issue for a while but now causing upgrade issues.
Can we get some help in BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929101
Please make sure I have not mis-spoken.
Thanks,
Richard
_
Based on upstream clarification[1], the license of python-keyring is
“MIT OR Python-2.0.1” rather than “MIT AND Python-2.0.1”, and the
License field of the package has been adjusted accordingly[2].
In future upstream releases, the license will simply be “MIT”.
[1] https://github.com/jaraco/key
> On Dec 9, 2022, at 8:29 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I've started the non-responsive maintainer procedure for pjp
> (https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/user/pjp/) with
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152159
>
> I currently have a pull request that has been b
Hi all,
With the update to the regex-syntax crate package that I'm building
right now, the license will change from "MIT OR Apache-2.0" to "(MIT
OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016".
The project includes code that is derived from Unicode data files, and
it already shipped a license text for the U
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on 2022-12-26. This is
the quiet time of year when most folks are enjoying the holidays.
Today's meeting we gave up on as only three of us showed up, I don't
expect better turnout on Boxing Day and I don't have anything important
for the agenda. If a
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 3:35 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:20 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 3:16 PM Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I have now submitted
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 and
> > > h
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:20 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 3:16 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > I have now submitted
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 and
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150094 for the
> > `node
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 3:16 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> I have now submitted
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150093 and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2150094 for the
> `nodejs16` and `nodejs18` packages for Fedora.
>
> You can test them with `dn
Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-12-13)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2
Hi.
I have just orphaned python-gzipstream.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gzipstream
If you want to keep it running then feel free to take it.
I have not used this library for ages. This was part of Spacewalk project
https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/wiki/Projects_pyth
On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 10:57 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImageMagick7
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be impleme
On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 13:05 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 12/12/2022 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > The way I read it, Adam is removing firmware files that current Fedora
> > kernels won't load, ever.
>
> Are you sure that that firmware is not needed at all?
Yes. I've double-check
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FedoraBudgie
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImageMagick7
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> On 12/12/2022 13:35, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
>> So newer linux-firmware can support older kernels, which isn't
>> relevant for Fedora (to a degree that might be relevant upstream).
>
> Thanks for the info. I thought they were used by older hardware revisions.
>
> S
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221211.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221212.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 52
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 26.98 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 12/12/2022 13:35, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
So newer linux-firmware can support older kernels, which isn't relevant
for Fedora (to a degree that might be relevant upstream).
Thanks for the info. I thought they were used by older hardware revisions.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Sincerely,
Vit
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 1:25 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> If Intel ships all these blobs in linux-firmware, then they have a good
> reason for this, don't they?
>
So newer linux-firmware can support older kernels, which isn't relevant for
Fedora (to a degr
On 12/12/2022 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
The way I read it, Adam is removing firmware files that current Fedora
kernels won't load, ever.
Are you sure that that firmware is not needed at all?
If Intel ships all these blobs in linux-firmware, then they have a good
reason for this, don't they
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:58 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I how solved this ? [1]
> Thank you
I suggest that you take a look at the Rust packaging guidelines, or at
how other packages in similar situations have handled this.
You need to configure the cargo build system correctly, i.e.
1.
* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> On 11/12/2022 20:53, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> There's a PR at
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/linux-firmware/pull-request/9 , and
>> Intel folks seem receptive to the idea of removing at least some of the
>> older ones upstream too.
>
> So, you want the still-
Hi,
I how solved this ? [1]
Thank you
[1]
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/ddnet-16.6 && /usr/bin/cmake -E env
CARGO_TARGET_DIR=/builddir/build/BUILD/ddnet-16.6/redhat-linux-build
DDNET_TEST_NO_LINK=1 /usr/bin/cargo build --release
Updating crates.io index
warning: spurious network error (2 tries remai
Hello all,
Fedora 35 will go end of life for updates and support on 2022-12-13
No further updates, including security updates, will be
available for Fedora 35 after the said date. All the updates of Fedora
35 being pushed to stable will be stopped as well.
Fedora 36 will continue to receive updat
On Monday, December 12, 2022, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 11/12/2022 20:53, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> There's a PR at
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/linux-firmware/pull-request/9 , and
>> Intel folks seem receptive to the idea of removing at leas
On 11/12/2022 20:53, Adam Williamson wrote:
There's a PR at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/linux-firmware/pull-request/9 , and
Intel folks seem receptive to the idea of removing at least some of the
older ones upstream too.
So, you want the still-working Wi-Fi chipsets to stop working? Ter
25 matches
Mail list logo