Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

On 12/18/22 00:24, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:21 AM Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: >> >> On 12/18/22 00:19, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:18 AM Demi Marie Obenour >>> wrote: On 12/17/22 05:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 17/12/2022 06:29,

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:21 AM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 12/18/22 00:19, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:18 AM Demi Marie Obenour > > wrote: > >> > >> On 12/17/22 05:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > >>> On 17/12/2022 06:29, Bob Hepple wrote: > Now that we have

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

On 12/18/22 00:19, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:18 AM Demi Marie Obenour > wrote: >> >> On 12/17/22 05:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: >>> On 17/12/2022 06:29, Bob Hepple wrote: Now that we have ffmpeg-free we have an opportunity to move wf-recorder to the mainstrea

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:18 AM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 12/17/22 05:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 17/12/2022 06:29, Bob Hepple wrote: > >> Now that we have ffmpeg-free we have an opportunity to move wf-recorder > >> to the mainstream and change the default codec to the non-p

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

On 12/17/22 05:31, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 17/12/2022 06:29, Bob Hepple wrote: >> Now that we have ffmpeg-free we have an opportunity to move wf-recorder >> to the mainstream and change the default codec to the non-proprietary >> libopenh264. > > You still can't link against openh26

Re: duktape soname bump

On Fri Dec 16, 2022 at 20:31 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > I wish I could write that I am going to build duktape 2.7.0 which bumps the > soname. However, my brain kind of misfired and I didn't, for some reason, > announce this upfront. The changes are minor, ABI changing stuff, I've > taken c

Re: mmap() being called instead of mmap2() on i686 Rawhide

On 12/17/22 17:12, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: I *think* I may have found a bug in glibc in rawhide, but I'm not sure. I figured I would ask here first before filing a bug. I'm trying to track down a shared memory issue in openmpi on i686 rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

On Sat, Dec 17, 2022, 10:35 PM Bob Hepple wrote: > > What if you use libvpx-vp9 for video, opus for audio, and use an mkv > file extension? Does it work better? > > No, it doesn't ... > > $ wf-recorder -c libvpx-vp9 -C opus -f recording.mkv > $ file recording.mkv > recording.mkv: Matroska data >

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

> What if you use libvpx-vp9 for video, opus for audio, and use an mkv file extension? Does it work better? No, it doesn't ... $ wf-recorder -c libvpx-vp9 -C opus -f recording.mkv $ file recording.mkv recording.mkv: Matroska data ... but it still takes a looong time to build the index. On VP9:

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 7:49 PM Bob Hepple wrote: > > Thanks to all of you for the helpful hints! > > I will release in f37 too as suggested - I understand that I can only retire > from rpmfusion in rawhide/f38, but I guess that's OK. > > libvpx-vp9 does indeed work in both ffmpegs - the only dow

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

Thanks to all of you for the helpful hints! I will release in f37 too as suggested - I understand that I can only retire from rpmfusion in rawhide/f38, but I guess that's OK. libvpx-vp9 does indeed work in both ffmpegs - the only downside is that it takes >25s to terminate on SIGINT ^C (the norma

mmap() being called instead of mmap2() on i686 Rawhide

I *think* I may have found a bug in glibc in rawhide, but I'm not sure. I figured I would ask here first before filing a bug. I'm trying to track down a shared memory issue in openmpi on i686 rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142304 https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/11

COPR and rpmautospec

It looks like COPR always produces 1 for %autorelease. Is this a known issue? Is there a way around it? Here's a build that shows this: Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing lis

Re: duktape soname bump

On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 08:31:59PM +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > I wish I could write that I am going to build duktape 2.7.0 which bumps the > soname. However, my brain kind of misfired and I didn't, for some reason, > announce this upfront. The changes are minor, ABI changing stuff, I've > t

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 12:29 AM Bob Hepple wrote: > > I am the packager for wf-recorder (a wl-roots/wayland screen recorder) which > presently resides in rpmfusion - it uses proprietary ffmpeg codecs by default > (libx246). > > Now that we have ffmpeg-free we have an opportunity to move wf-reco

Re: Looking for advice - ffmpeg-free and wf-recorder

On 17/12/2022 06:29, Bob Hepple wrote: Now that we have ffmpeg-free we have an opportunity to move wf-recorder to the mainstream and change the default codec to the non-proprietary libopenh264. You still can't link against openh264 because Fedora can't ship it an even have in Koji's buildroot

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221217.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221216.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221217.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 76 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 145.54 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: SPDX Statistics - Advent edition

On 16. 12. 22 16:20, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 16. 12. 22 v 15:59 Richard Shaw napsal(a): I appreciate the effort so I hate to ask, but can we get a similar list but grouped by maintainer? I don't have a lot of free time these days and it would make my life easier :) I can write it on my TODO

[Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Rawhide 20221217.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 38 Rawhide 20221217.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Review swaps

I have filed a few package requests to get python's openapi-core into Fedora repositories, each one depends on the previous one: - python-pathable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154186  |- python-jsonschema-spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154188     |- python-open