Re: Tenacity

On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: wxGTK should have that... It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X series as far as I can tell. 3.2.1 in F37 at least builds, but for some reason liblibnyquist.so is missing. F38 / Rawhide has some lisp issue with the

Request exemption for f38-backgrounds

Hello team, I filed an exemption[1] for f38-backgrounds packaging review[2] as suggestion from desktop team on discussion last year. The spec file remains virtually unchanged other than an updated default wallpaper. Thamks. Ref: [1] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/51051

Re: Tenacity

wxGTK should have that... ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: h

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired next week

On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 18:14, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > > 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happe

Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

On 2/7/23 07:52, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:36 PM Lokesh Mandvekar > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:56 PM Peter Robinson wrote: >> >>> There are still active users of Fedora IoT 36 on armhfp using >>> containers so I suspect they may be unhappy of they go away befor

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

On 2/8/23 08:41, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > (*) I know this term ("lowest common denominator") is mathematically > nonsense. There is only a least/lowest common multiple and a greatest common > denominator in mathematics. :-) I mean there *is* a lowest common denominator: 1 :) -- Sincerely

Re: Tenacity

On 2/8/23 10:59 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: stan via devel writes: As they say in the BUILDING.md file, though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out. That's odd; as far as I can see, F36 has 3.1.5 and F37

Re: MuseScore 4.0

I'm finally circling back around to MuseScore 4.0. The COPR (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/MuseScore4/) has been updated with a new build, of version 4.0.1. On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > I managed to download the Muse Sounds, and they work. Only the basic >

Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

On 2/8/23 09:51, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:43:19AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: ... Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch should not be impacted. More generally podman can run

Re: Take 1 minute to help with Infra & Releng Team with a decision

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 06:43:02PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Tuesday, 2023-02-07 16:24:16 +0100, Michal Konecny wrote: > > > [0] - https://forms.gle/J2HWDkw1UNuj8HYD8 > > Don't be surprised if you don't get the number of answers you hoped for, > on > > a) a Google form > b)

Re: Take 1 minute to help with Infra & Releng Team with a decision

Hi Michal, On Tuesday, 2023-02-07 16:24:16 +0100, Michal Konecny wrote: > [0] - https://forms.gle/J2HWDkw1UNuj8HYD8 Don't be surprised if you don't get the number of answers you hoped for, on a) a Google form b) that requires a Google account c) to be logged in Eike -- GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765

Re: Tenacity

> stan via devel writes: > As they say in the BUILDING.md file, > though, fedora lacks wxWidgets 3.1.5 or greater. That stops the > configuration, cmake -G Ninja -S . -B build when it errors out. That's odd; as far as I can see, F36 has 3.1.5 and F37 has 3.2.1. - J< ___

Re: Tenacity

On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 09:02:47 -0700 stan wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:44:30 -0700 > stan wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100 > > Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > > > > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going > > > for Fedora? - I would prefer that to

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:24:47 + Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 12:03 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:45:37PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski- > > > Szmek wrote: > > > > On

Re: Tenacity

On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:44:30 -0700 stan wrote: > On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100 > Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going > > for Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage > > version . > > I knew about the

Re: Tenacity

On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:22 PM Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 7:26 PM Philip Rhoades via devel > wrote: > > > > People, > > > > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for > > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . . > > >

Re: Tenacity

On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 06:25:07 +1100 Philip Rhoades via devel wrote: > Has there been any discussion about getting a Tenacity RPM going for > Fedora? - I would prefer that to having to use the AppImage version . I knew about the corporate takeover of audacity, but I didn't know about this fork.

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 12:03 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:45:37PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski- > > Szmek wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Mo

Re: reclaim orphaned moarvm package

okay, thanks for your advice. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guideline

Re: reclaim orphaned moarvm package

update: I also plan to claim nqp and rakudo packages. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of

Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:43:19AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > ... > > > Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch > > > should not be impacted. > > > > More generally podman can run containers of foreign ar

Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: ... > > Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch > > should not be impacted. > > More generally podman can run containers of foreign architectures using > qemu-user emulation, albeit with an obvious speed penalty.

Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 07:17:16PM +0530, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:01 AM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: > > Does dropping the 32-bit i686 build also imply you cannot use 32-bit > > containers on a 64-bit architecture? If so, will anybody notice? Since you > > did not use

Re: reclaim orphaned moarvm package

V Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 02:09:10PM -, Felix Wang napsal(a): > I had planned to pick `moarvm` package up when I saw it was already > orphaned. I am very willing to maintain or comaintain it. My FAS name is > topazus. Great to read it. You can follow this procedure for unretiring a package

Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch > should not be impacted. Good to know. Then I think nobody will miss the i686 build or even notice its absence (considering that it is not a shared library and that pure i686 installations of Fedora ha

reclaim orphaned moarvm package

I had planned to pick `moarvm` package up when I saw it was already orphaned. I am very willing to maintain or comaintain it. My FAS name is topazus. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list

Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:01 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Does dropping the 32-bit i686 build also imply you cannot use 32-bit > containers on a 64-bit architecture? If so, will anybody notice? Since you > did not use any special naming tricks (both package naming and file naming) > to allow

Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 11:06 PM Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > As for i686, you don't need extra paperwork thanks to exclude packages > thanks to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval. > You just need to properly handle dependent packages. You cannot > ExcludeArch a pa

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Looking at Flatpaks with both my upstream author hat and distro maintainer > hat, the main advantages I see is not the isolation. It is that they have > the potential to eliminate the massive amount of duplicated work between > every distro re-packaging the same app, and

Re: Package naming suggestion?

On 08-02-2023 03:38, Joe Doss wrote: On 2/7/23 8:28 PM, Chris Adams wrote: I've got a few useful Nagios monitoring plugins I'd like to add to Fedora/EPEL. I'm rather unimaginative at naming, so the Github repo for them is "nagios-plugins-cmadams"... while I wouldn't mind having a package with m

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230208.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230207.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230208.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 129 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.19 MiB Size of dropped packages

jaxb, jaxb-fi, jakarta-activation license change

After my updates to several jaxb packages, some of the licenses changed: Source package jaxb: jaxb-rngom: BSD -> (MIT and BSD) jaxb-xjc: BSD -> (BSD and ASL 2.0) Source package jaxb-fi: jaxb-fi-tests (previously known as FastInfosetRoundTripTests): (ASL 2.0 and BSD and ASL 1.1) -> (ASL 2.0 and

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:01:17PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular case, > > > but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is unf

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 5:06 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:00:22AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > No, that's the promise of Fedora Flatpaks, which is an effort with a > > distinct identity and philosophy (but which is, uh, not being its best > > possible self so far, I

Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:00:22AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > No, that's the promise of Fedora Flatpaks, which is an effort with a > distinct identity and philosophy (but which is, uh, not being its best > possible self so far, I think everyone would agree). It's not the Joining this discussi

[Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Rawhide 20230208.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 38 Rawhide 20230208.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Inactive provenpackagers to be removed from group

In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the provenpackager group. Note that