Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-03-07)

2023-03-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2023-03-07 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be dis

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

2023-03-06 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 3/6/23 13:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 12:18:18AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >> David Michael wrote: >>> - Firecracker can be built with Fedora's libc (glibc), but it is >>> officially unsupported upstream[3]. Functionality would be harmed by >>> not using m

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2023-03-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Upcoming summer time changes

2023-03-06 Thread Luna Jernberg
Hi! Good to know that time will diff between US and EU for 2 weeks, this email is always helpful every year :) On 3/6/23, Ben Cotton wrote: > As a reminder to the community, we've reached the point in the year > where jurisdictions around the world begin or end summer time. Be sure > to check yo

Upcoming summer time changes

2023-03-06 Thread Ben Cotton
As a reminder to the community, we've reached the point in the year where jurisdictions around the world begin or end summer time. Be sure to check your recurring meetings on Fedocal[1] to make sure you know when you're meeting. Some meetings are set to a fixed time UTC and others are set to a part

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

2023-03-06 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > And since we're talking hypervisors, qemu also manages to use glibc & > implement a seccomp filter. Good to know. I was not aware that qemu has a seccomp filter, that is nice. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- dev

Re: Firecracker microVM manager

2023-03-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 12:18:18AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > David Michael wrote: > > - Firecracker can be built with Fedora's libc (glibc), but it is > > officially unsupported upstream[3]. Functionality would be harmed by > > not using musl, e.g. seccomp filters are not used. > > U

License change: python-versioneer, python-ncclient

2023-03-06 Thread Ben Beasley
Since python-versioneer was updated to 0.28 in Rawhide, its license changed from Public Domain (which really should have been CC0-1.0) to Unlicense. This reflects an upstream relicensing decision in version 0.24. While the comments in versioneer-generated _version.py files mention only that the

Summary/Minutes from today's Fedora Flatpak Packaging SIG Meeting (2023-03-06)

2023-03-06 Thread Kalev Lember
= #fedora-meeting: Fedora Flatpak Packaging SIG = Meeting started by kalev at 15:00:19 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-03-06/flatpak-sig.2023-03-06-15

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 38 RC 20230306.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

2023-03-06 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 38 RC 20230306.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pl

Re: JupyterLab finally in Fedora and the future of Jupyter Notebook

2023-03-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 04:19:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 05. 03. 23 12:32, Lumír Balhar wrote: > > Fedora 39 now contains JupyterLab 4.0.0 alpha 34 which allows me to > > update Jupyter Notebook to 7.0.0 alpha 14. ... > > Any help testing the prereleases is appreciated. > > Thank you, Lu

Re: How to depend on a .so.X in RPM specs?

2023-03-06 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 06. 03. 23 v 14:27 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 06. 03. 23 v 12:49 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a): While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project still packages it. For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and libopenscap.so.25 through FFI. Today we

Re: How to depend on a .so.X in RPM specs?

2023-03-06 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 06. 03. 23 v 12:49 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a): While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project still packages it. For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and libopenscap.so.25 through FFI. Today we depend on a specific version, but every time it

Fedora 38 compose report: 20230306.n.0 changes

2023-03-06 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-38-20230305.n.0 NEW: Fedora-38-20230306.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 2 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: How to depend on a .so.X in RPM specs?

2023-03-06 Thread Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 01:27:18PM +0100, Jarek Prokop wrote: Interesting situation. On 3/6/23 12:49, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project still packages it. For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and libopenscap.

Re: How to depend on a .so.X in RPM specs?

2023-03-06 Thread Jarek Prokop
Interesting situation. On 3/6/23 12:49, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project still packages it. For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and libopenscap.so.25 through FFI. Today we depend on a specific version, but

Re: How to depend on a .so.X in RPM specs?

2023-03-06 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 06/03/2023 12:49, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: so what is the correct approach here? Requires: openscap%{?_isa} -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

How to depend on a .so.X in RPM specs?

2023-03-06 Thread Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
While rubygem-openscap is retired in Fedora, the Foreman project still packages it. For context: rubygem-openscap can load libopenscap.so.8 and libopenscap.so.25 through FFI. Today we depend on a specific version, but every time it's bumped we go through a verification to see if the SO versio

Re: Packit service not submitting builds or updates for branched / F38

2023-03-06 Thread Tomas Tomecek
Hello, just a small update. We have verified recently that Packit staging correctly creates F38 updates now: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b3613064bf This will land in production tomorrow, so as of March 7th, Packit will correctly create F38 dist-git PRs and everything else.

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230306.n.0 changes

2023-03-06 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230304.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230306.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 272 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 295.41 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Non-responsive packagers: sbluhm, shaneallcroft

2023-03-06 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 09:29:02 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > - shaneallcroft contacted since January 11th 2023 > shaneallcroft is main admin of rpms/pyplane > shaneallcroft has a bugzilla override on rpms/pyplane We've not seen Shane at the Neuro-SIG meetings recent

Take 1 minute to help with Infra & Releng Team with a decision - closing tomorrow

2023-03-06 Thread Michal Konecny
Hi everyone, this survey will be closed tomorrow, so you have last day to fill it. We will share the results once the survey will be closed. Thanks everybody for helping us decide. On behalf of I&R Team, Michal On 07. 02. 23 16:24, Michal Konecny wrote: Hi everyone, it came to Infra & Rele

Non-responsive packagers: sbluhm, shaneallcroft

2023-03-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning Everyone, The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking them to either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email address in FAS matches an existing bugzilla account. Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the