Re: Upcoming retirement of unused compat packages for Rust crates

On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 10:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > All listed packages are compat packages with newer versions of these > projects already being available in Fedora 37+, and all listed > packages have no dependent packages left. If anybody has objections to > retiring any of these package

Re: Orphaning python-moksha-hub

On 07-06-2023 11:37, Lumír Balhar wrote: I got a bugzilla [0] that because of the retired python3-stomper python3-moksha-hub fails to install in rawhide. I'm no longer interested in this package but somebody should take it together with the python-stomper because important packages like fedmsg

Re: Issue with Rawhide docker image?

On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 14:55 -0400, Daniel Walsh wrote: > On 6/7/23 13:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 07:19:32PM +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 19:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:30:56PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > > > > Once upo

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 11:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 13:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts orphan, vishalvvr    2 weeks > > ago > > So this one is a problem: it appears to be our intended default font > for Arabic. It's par

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, 2023-05-15 at 13:45 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > paktype-naskh-basic-fonts orphan, vishalvvr    2 weeks ago So this one is a problem: it appears to be our intended default font for Arabic. It's part of the @fonts group in comps and it's also in the lorax templates (mean

Re: Issue with Rawhide docker image?

On 6/7/23 13:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 07:19:32PM +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 19:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:30:56PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Clement Verna said: Once https://github.com/docker-library/official-

Re: How to fix the "rpma.src: W: strange-permission rpma.spec 600" warning?

On 5/25/23 09:56, Xiao Yang wrote: Hi all, I try to create rpma source package on fedora by fedpkg --release rawhide mockbuild. The permissions of original rpma.spec is 0644: $ ll rpma.spec -rw-r--r--. 1 mockbuild mock 2107 May 25 17:31 rpma.spec The permissions of rpma.spec in the generated r

Re: Issue with Rawhide docker image?

On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 07:19:32PM +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 19:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:30:56PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > > Once upon a time, Clement Verna said: > > > > Once https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/14789

Re: Issue with Rawhide docker image?

On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 19:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:30:56PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Clement Verna said: > > > Once https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/14789 merges, > > > the rawhide image on the DockerHub should be fixed too :

Re: Issue with Rawhide docker image?

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:30:56PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Clement Verna said: > > Once https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/14789 merges, > > the rawhide image on the DockerHub should be fixed too :-) > > So... if it takes a manual process (including openi

Re: Missing features...

On 6/7/23 06:59, Adam Ł. wrote: What about missing feature ? https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nandi-bishal_powerpoint-design-study-activity-7072031917180674048-stI8?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Feature requests go to the upstream issue tracker. _

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Automatic Cloud Reboot on Updates (Self-Contained Change)

This proposal has now been submitted to FESCo https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3010 ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Aspell Depreciation (Self-Contained Change)

This proposal has now been submitted to FESCo https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3009 ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Build JDKs once, repack everywhere (System-Wide Change)

This proposal has now been submitted to FESCo https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3008 ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

lpsolve license (partially) corrected

I corrected lpsolve package license from (LGPL-2.1-or-later) to (LGPL-2.1-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Bison-exception-2.2). The correction will be completed after obtaining an SPDX license identifier for a bundled colamd code

Re: LibreOffice packages

On 6/7/23 15:15, Michael Catanzaro wrote: [1] https://github.com/flathub/flatpak-external-data-checker Oh, thanks, didn't know about that. Will try to make use of it for LibreOffice, "Add metadata for flatpak-external-data-ch

Re: Missing features...

Another example of this feature: https://youtu.be/hz3YvteLaC4 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project

Missing features...

What about missing feature ? https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nandi-bishal_powerpoint-design-study-activity-7072031917180674048-stI8?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig

What ( and eventually where post this message ) about missing feature in LibreOffic3 ? (transulcent/transparent groups and interesecion 2d object/text top of video) https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nandi-bishal_powerpoint-design-study-activity-7072031917180674048-stI8?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mem

Re: LibreOffice packages

The main difference is that Fedora - be it rpms, flatpaks from module rpms (current state), flatpaks from whatever - comes with the promise of all the four F's, including freedom from legal issues as outlined in our guidelines. That enables RedHat to make the guarantees which they make for their

Re: LibreOffice packages

Ideally all bundled dependencies should be hooked up to some sort of automation that notices when there are upstream updates available, comparable to upstream release monitoring. On Flathub this is done by flathub-external-data-checker [1], but using it is optional and it's not useful if it's

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 11:43 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > plexus-component-api  orphan   6 > weeks ago - this package (plexus-component-api) was retired an hour ago, running [1] I checked the depending packages are: maven-native plexus-active- collections - ple

Re: LibreOffice packages

On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 18:07:04 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On the other hand, the libreoffice flatpak bundles ~80 projects: > - gpgme (huh?) This... > - openldap (huh?) and perhaps this are probably because it is possible to sign and encrypt ODF documents using OpenPGP. Some details are here:

Re: LibreOffice packages

On Wednesday, 07 June 2023 at 08:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 6/6/23 18:07, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > In general, I do like having software available as flatpaks, > > especially if it's not available from Fedora repositories. > > However, there's also the question of *trust* - do I trust the >

Re: LibreOffice packages

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 8:51 AM Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > If you are talking about the LibreOffice upstream flatpak on Flathub > (i.e., > ): Yes, that is what I

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaning python-moksha-hub

Hi. I got a bugzilla [0] that because of the retired python3-stomper python3-moksha-hub fails to install in rawhide. I'm no longer interested in this package but somebody should take it together with the python-stomper because important packages like fedmsg and module-build-service depend on

Re: Mock v4.1 (bugfix) released (and mock-core-configs v38.6)

On úterý 6. června 2023 22:04:26 CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 06. 06. 23 v 18:32 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > > On 05. 06. 23 10:39, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> - Mock doesn't "Requires:" DNF anymore, just Suggests > > > > So how does this actually work? > > If you really want to work without DNF t