> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 7:59 PM Michael Catanzaro
>
> It looks like these fdo / non-GNOME projects would need new homes /
> maintainers:
>
> - power-profiles-daemon
> - switcheroo-control
> - iio-sensor-proxy
> - low-memory-monitor
>
> Looks like they are *all* installed by default in Fedor
On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 21:23 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:39:07PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just a heads-up: for the upgrade to DNF5 in F39, we unprotected the DNF
> > package, which leaves all of our users vulnerable to a removal of DNF.
> >
Hi Leigh,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 7:26 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> > just a note rpmfusion free and nofree not ready
> >
> >
>
> What do you mean?
> I branched rpmfusion two week ago, the repo deps look fine to me.
>
See the reply from Philip Rhoades - I've hit the same on Silverblue when
tryin
Hello team,
Due to a busy schedule, I am currently unable to investigate the issue
related to python-openshadinglanguage on both Rawhide and Fedora 39 due
to fmt10 compatibilty.
Could someone take a look at the issue and resolve it please?
Thank you.
Reference:
-
https://bu
you are absolutly right
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: htt
On 23-08-2023 14:55, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 23. 08. 23 v 12:44 Sandro napsal(a):
On 20-08-2023 12:19, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
If you are workshop participant and have PR opened for longer than 14
days then let me know and I will merge it.
Here's the one I made during Flock workshop:
https:/
Hello,
Does anyone know how to contact juergh (Juerg Haefliger)? They are the
sole maintainer of a single package in Fedora (cloud-utils), which
hasn't seen any activity for almost 4 years.
I've filed a non-responsive check bug here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234606
Here are o
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 07:39:07PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a heads-up: for the upgrade to DNF5 in F39, we unprotected the DNF
> package, which leaves all of our users vulnerable to a removal of DNF.
>
>
> We have one affected user here:
> https://bsd.network/@claudi
On 8/24/23 15:48, Adam Piasecki wrote:
Hello everyone,
I hope this message finds you all well!
My name is Adam Piasecki, and I've recently joined this mailing list to further
immerse myself in such a vibrant open-source community ;)
I joined Red Hat in 2022 as an intern, and ever since one thin
On 8/23/23 20:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releaseve
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-08-24/fesco.2023-08-24-17.04.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-08-24/fesco.2023-08-24-17.04.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-08-24/fesco.2023-08-24-17.04.lo
Hello,
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 2:27:40 PM EDT Steven Presti wrote:
> * New Package Request: audit (spresti, 17:04:16)
> * LINK: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1362
> (spresti, 17:04:29)
> * LINK:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/audit/blob/rawhide/f/a
> just a note rpmfusion free and nofree not ready
>
>
What is the issue?
I branched rpmfusion repo two weeks ago
$ sudo repoclosure --check rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfree
Last metadata expiration check: 1:27:59 ago on Thu 24 Aug 2023 17:14:49 BST.
package: mesa-va-drivers-freewo
Hello,
Just a heads-up: for the upgrade to DNF5 in F39, we unprotected the DNF package, which
leaves all of our users vulnerable to a removal of DNF.
And since the delaying of DNF5, we haven't re-protected it.
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/commit/352b174a0b4ce2048ef1a25b785f2
== Summary ==
New or revised (sub)package names are proposed for Kubernetes packages
in Fedora. The new names will better align Kubernetes with current
usage as documented upstream and improve alignment of package content
with current Fedora practices and standards.
See
https://discussion.fedorap
== Summary ==
The python-sqlalchemy package is upgraded to major version 2. A
compatibility package python-sqlalchemy1.4 is added to the
distribution to cater for software which doesn’t yet use the new API,
this can be installed side-by-side. Other packages using SQLAlchemy
are identified and, if n
> just a note rpmfusion free and nofree not ready
>
>
What do you mean?
I branched rpmfusion two week ago, the repo deps look fine to me.
$ sudo repoclosure --check rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfreetanita999fly
Last metadata expiration check: 1:07:49 ago on Thu 24 Aug 2023 17:14:49
BTW, after removing python3-slip, python3-slip-dbus and python3-decorator,
both dnf5 and dnf produce no errors
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 6:35 AM Tom London wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 3:39 AM Nicola Sella wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mirek,
>>
>> dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=pla
No meeting this week.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 8:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2023-08-25 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
>
> The meeting will be about:
_
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2023-08-24 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
As far as I can tell it's mostly legacy removal and adoption of (now)
standardized types, such as "z_size_t" being replaced by "size_t"
There is a document here that tries to describe the different considerations:
https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/blob/develop/PORTING.md
"The zlib-ng native ha
Hello everyone,
I hope this message finds you all well!
My name is Adam Piasecki, and I've recently joined this mailing list to further
immerse myself in such a vibrant open-source community ;)
I joined Red Hat in 2022 as an intern, and ever since one thing has been
constant: my sincere belief
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 3:39 AM Nicola Sella wrote:
> Thanks Mirek,
>
> dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
>> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
>> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
>> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
>> --assumeno distro-sync
>>
> Al
On 8/23/23 04:12 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 1:41 PM Steven A. Falco mailto:stevenfa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 8/23/23 02:22 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -
OLD: Fedora-39-20230823.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20230824.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2023-08-25 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10531/
___
devel maili
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Branched 20230824.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
@Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho there is one
question I have due to the zlib-ng...
What is the difference between zlib-ng compiled with and without the
`ZLIB_COMPAT=ON` option? Are there any differences in the performance, or
is it only the names of the functions?
I'm interested in this because
Thanks Mirek,
dnf --releasever=39 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f39 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
>
Allow me to steal some testing. :)
I would like to point out that ru
Hello,
I got quite a few issues, some of these are from third party repos, but
others do seem to be Fedora packages that are still FTBFS/FTI (a
majority are neuro-sig packages that we're aware of and working on):
Problem 1: package python3-cypy-0.2.0-12.fc38.noarch from @System requires
python(
30 matches
Mail list logo
