Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230902.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230902.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:9 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:24 Upgraded packages: 224 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 18.25 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 05:00:37PM +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 02-09-2023 14:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > Then: > > > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction check > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction check succeeded. > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction test > > DEBUG util.py:444:  Transact

Re: rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

On 02-09-2023 14:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Then: DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction check DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction check succeeded. DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction test DEBUG util.py:444:  Transaction test succeeded. DEBUG util.py:444:  Running transaction DEBUG util.py:595: 

Re: Lastpass-cli license correction

When you are back with Fedora 38,39,40, I will register and do a contribution payment. Leslie Satenstein On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 01:15:14 p.m. EDT, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hello Fedoreans an others, Lastpass-cli license will be corrected from GPL-2.0-only to: GPL-

Re: zlib-ng as a compat replacement for zlib

Thank you.  Leslie Satenstein On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 09:29:36 a.m. EDT, Daniel Alley wrote: Yeah, the Zstd default of 3 is tuned to be roughly on par with alternatives but much faster.  To get better compression than gzip you generally need to go to higher levels. 

Re: zlib-ng as a compat replacement for zlib

Yeah, the Zstd default of 3 is tuned to be roughly on par with alternatives but much faster. To get better compression than gzip you generally need to go to higher levels. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Fedora 39 compose report: 20230902.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-39-20230901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-39-20230902.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:9 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:5.25 MiB Size of

Re: rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

On Sat, 2 Sep 2023 21:07:07 +0900 Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Hello, all: > > Looks like currently rawhide buildroot seems weird state, mainly > on ppc64le, but sometimes also on other arches: > > e.g. > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105650426 ^^^ nothing suspicious in the jou

rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

Hello, all: Looks like currently rawhide buildroot seems weird state, mainly on ppc64le, but sometimes also on other arches: e.g. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105650426 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105642860 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskin

Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition

Dne 02. 09. 23 v 13:07 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): "python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check" The License string is valid as both the old-style Fedora license and a SPDX expression, and the tooling did not match anything in the changelog that woul

Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 02:39:14AM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > What does this message mean: > > "python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please > check" The License string is valid as both the old-style Fedora license and a SPDX expression, and the tooling did

Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition

Hi, What does this message mean: "python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check" -Tom On 9/1/23 01:33, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Two weeks ago we had: * 23030 spec files in Fedora * 29469license tags in all spec files * 16716 tags have not been converted to SP